Usha Martin Education & Solutions Limited
Usha Martin Education & Solutions Limited (UMESLTD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMESLTD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMESLTD.NS | ₹6.50 | -2.40% | 171.2M | 49.85 | ₹0.13 | N/A |
| NIITMTS.BO | ₹322.75 | +3.21% | 43.4B | 20.24 | ₹15.64 | +0.95% |
| NIITMTS.NS | ₹323.65 | +3.12% | 43.4B | 20.22 | ₹15.63 | +0.95% |
| CRIZAC.NS | ₹225.94 | +2.87% | 37.8B | 19.72 | ₹10.96 | +3.70% |
| CRIZAC.BO | ₹226.95 | +3.30% | 37.8B | 19.69 | ₹10.96 | +3.70% |
| VERANDA.BO | ₹153.60 | +1.29% | 14.2B | 15.36 | ₹9.64 | N/A |
| VERANDA.NS | ₹153.42 | +1.28% | 14.2B | 15.31 | ₹9.65 | N/A |
| NIITLTD.BO | ₹67.69 | +3.77% | 9B | 39.37 | ₹1.67 | +1.52% |
| NIITLTD.NS | ₹67.84 | +4.00% | 9B | 39.31 | ₹1.67 | +1.52% |
| GLOBAL.NS | ₹102.50 | +3.81% | 5.2B | 22.91 | ₹4.43 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITMTS.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, NIITMTS.BO has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while NIITMTS.BO trades at ₹322.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas NIITMTS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITMTS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITMTS.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITMTS.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, NIITMTS.NS has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while NIITMTS.NS trades at ₹323.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas NIITMTS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITMTS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITMTS.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CRIZAC.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, CRIZAC.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while CRIZAC.NS trades at ₹225.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas CRIZAC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRIZAC.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CRIZAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CRIZAC.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CRIZAC.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, CRIZAC.BO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while CRIZAC.BO trades at ₹226.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas CRIZAC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRIZAC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CRIZAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CRIZAC.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs VERANDA.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, VERANDA.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while VERANDA.BO trades at ₹153.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas VERANDA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERANDA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to VERANDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check VERANDA.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs VERANDA.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, VERANDA.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while VERANDA.NS trades at ₹153.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas VERANDA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERANDA.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to VERANDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check VERANDA.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, NIITLTD.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while NIITLTD.BO trades at ₹67.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas NIITLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITLTD.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, NIITLTD.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while NIITLTD.NS trades at ₹67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas NIITLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITLTD.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITLTD.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GLOBAL.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, GLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while GLOBAL.NS trades at ₹102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas GLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to GLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GLOBAL.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs APTECHT.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, APTECHT.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while APTECHT.BO trades at ₹87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas APTECHT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTECHT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to APTECHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check APTECHT.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs APTECHT.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, APTECHT.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while APTECHT.NS trades at ₹88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas APTECHT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTECHT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to APTECHT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check APTECHT.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CLEDUCATE.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while CLEDUCATE.BO trades at ₹52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas CLEDUCATE.BO's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLEDUCATE.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CLEDUCATE.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while CLEDUCATE.NS trades at ₹52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas CLEDUCATE.NS's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLEDUCATE.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GOLDENCREST.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, GOLDENCREST.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while GOLDENCREST.BO trades at ₹333.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas GOLDENCREST.BO's P/E ratio is 2564.23. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOLDENCREST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDENCREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GOLDENCREST.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs ZEELEARN.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while ZEELEARN.NS trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas ZEELEARN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEELEARN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ZEELEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check ZEELEARN.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs ZEELEARN.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while ZEELEARN.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas ZEELEARN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEELEARN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ZEELEARN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check ZEELEARN.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs COMPUSOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while COMPUSOFT.BO trades at ₹14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas COMPUSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COMPUSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs COMPUSOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while COMPUSOFT.NS trades at ₹14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas COMPUSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.06. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COMPUSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEERTI.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, KEERTI.NS has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while KEERTI.NS trades at ₹71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas KEERTI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEERTI.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KEERTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEERTI.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.BO has a market cap of 667.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while LCCINFOTEC.BO trades at ₹5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas LCCINFOTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -40.54. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.NS has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while LCCINFOTEC.NS trades at ₹5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas LCCINFOTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -56.44. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs TREEHOUSE.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 350.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while TREEHOUSE.BO trades at ₹8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas TREEHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREEHOUSE.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs TREEHOUSE.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while TREEHOUSE.NS trades at ₹8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas TREEHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREEHOUSE.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEEPLEARN.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.NS has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while KEEPLEARN.NS trades at ₹2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas KEEPLEARN.NS's P/E ratio is -199.00. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEEPLEARN.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEEPLEARN.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.BO has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while KEEPLEARN.BO trades at ₹2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas KEEPLEARN.BO's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEEPLEARN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GTECJAINX.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, GTECJAINX.NS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while GTECJAINX.NS trades at ₹20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas GTECJAINX.NS's P/E ratio is -22.06. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTECJAINX.NS's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to GTECJAINX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GTECJAINX.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs UMESLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, UMESLTD.BO has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while UMESLTD.BO trades at ₹6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas UMESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 50.31. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMESLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to UMESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check UMESLTD.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs EDUCOMP.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.NS has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while EDUCOMP.NS trades at ₹0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas EDUCOMP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EDUCOMP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EDUCOMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check EDUCOMP.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs EDUCOMP.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.BO has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while EDUCOMP.BO trades at ₹0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas EDUCOMP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EDUCOMP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EDUCOMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check EDUCOMP.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs MTEDUCARE.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.NS has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while MTEDUCARE.NS trades at ₹1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas MTEDUCARE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTEDUCARE.NS's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs MTEDUCARE.BO Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.BO has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while MTEDUCARE.BO trades at ₹1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas MTEDUCARE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTEDUCARE.BO's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs DALALSTCOM.NS Comparison April 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 171.2M. In comparison, DALALSTCOM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.50, while DALALSTCOM.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 49.85, whereas DALALSTCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DALALSTCOM.NS's ROE of +529.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to DALALSTCOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check DALALSTCOM.NS's competition here