Physicswallah Limited
Physicswallah Limited (PWL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWL.NS | ₹110.99 | +1.04% | 313.5B | -128.96 | -₹0.85 | N/A |
| PWL.BO | ₹111.00 | +0.91% | 314.1B | -129.24 | -₹0.85 | N/A |
| CRIZAC.BO | ₹224.15 | +9.72% | 35.7B | 18.58 | ₹10.97 | +3.93% |
| CRIZAC.NS | ₹223.99 | +9.47% | 35.6B | 18.56 | ₹10.97 | +3.93% |
| NIITMTS.NS | ₹219.25 | -2.47% | 29B | 11.93 | ₹17.66 | +1.42% |
| NIITMTS.BO | ₹218.65 | -2.74% | 28.9B | 11.92 | ₹17.66 | +1.42% |
| VERANDA.BO | ₹237.75 | -2.56% | 23.2B | 25.03 | ₹9.65 | N/A |
| VERANDA.NS | ₹237.85 | -2.51% | 23.2B | 25.02 | ₹9.65 | N/A |
| NIITLTD.NS | ₹68.95 | +6.01% | 9B | 39.59 | ₹1.67 | +1.51% |
| NIITLTD.BO | ₹68.95 | +6.21% | 9B | 39.47 | ₹1.67 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
PWL.NS vs PWL.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, PWL.BO has a market cap of 314.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while PWL.BO trades at ₹111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas PWL.BO's P/E ratio is -129.24. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PWL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to PWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check PWL.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs CRIZAC.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, CRIZAC.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while CRIZAC.BO trades at ₹224.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas CRIZAC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRIZAC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to CRIZAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check CRIZAC.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs CRIZAC.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, CRIZAC.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while CRIZAC.NS trades at ₹223.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas CRIZAC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRIZAC.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to CRIZAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check CRIZAC.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs NIITMTS.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, NIITMTS.NS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while NIITMTS.NS trades at ₹219.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas NIITMTS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NIITMTS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to NIITMTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check NIITMTS.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs NIITMTS.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, NIITMTS.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while NIITMTS.BO trades at ₹218.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas NIITMTS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NIITMTS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to NIITMTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check NIITMTS.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs VERANDA.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, VERANDA.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while VERANDA.BO trades at ₹237.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas VERANDA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VERANDA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to VERANDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check VERANDA.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs VERANDA.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, VERANDA.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while VERANDA.NS trades at ₹237.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas VERANDA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VERANDA.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to VERANDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check VERANDA.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs NIITLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, NIITLTD.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while NIITLTD.NS trades at ₹68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas NIITLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NIITLTD.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to NIITLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check NIITLTD.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs NIITLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, NIITLTD.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while NIITLTD.BO trades at ₹68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas NIITLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NIITLTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to NIITLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check NIITLTD.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs APTECHT.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, APTECHT.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while APTECHT.BO trades at ₹112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas APTECHT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APTECHT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to APTECHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check APTECHT.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs APTECHT.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, APTECHT.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while APTECHT.NS trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas APTECHT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APTECHT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to APTECHT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check APTECHT.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs GLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, GLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while GLOBAL.NS trades at ₹101.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas GLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to GLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check GLOBAL.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs CLEDUCATE.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while CLEDUCATE.BO trades at ₹46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas CLEDUCATE.BO's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLEDUCATE.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs CLEDUCATE.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while CLEDUCATE.NS trades at ₹46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas CLEDUCATE.NS's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLEDUCATE.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs ZEELEARN.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, ZEELEARN.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while ZEELEARN.NS trades at ₹6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas ZEELEARN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZEELEARN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to ZEELEARN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check ZEELEARN.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs ZEELEARN.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, ZEELEARN.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while ZEELEARN.BO trades at ₹6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas ZEELEARN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZEELEARN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to ZEELEARN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check ZEELEARN.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs GOLDENCREST.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, GOLDENCREST.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while GOLDENCREST.BO trades at ₹331.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas GOLDENCREST.BO's P/E ratio is 2370.00. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOLDENCREST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDENCREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check GOLDENCREST.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs COMPUSOFT.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while COMPUSOFT.BO trades at ₹13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas COMPUSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COMPUSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs COMPUSOFT.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while COMPUSOFT.NS trades at ₹13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas COMPUSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COMPUSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs KEERTI.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, KEERTI.NS has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while KEERTI.NS trades at ₹71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas KEERTI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KEERTI.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to KEERTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check KEERTI.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.BO has a market cap of 593.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while LCCINFOTEC.BO trades at ₹4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas LCCINFOTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.NS has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while LCCINFOTEC.NS trades at ₹4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas LCCINFOTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -50.11. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs KEEPLEARN.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.BO has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while KEEPLEARN.BO trades at ₹2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas KEEPLEARN.BO's P/E ratio is -215.00. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KEEPLEARN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs KEEPLEARN.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.NS has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while KEEPLEARN.NS trades at ₹2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas KEEPLEARN.NS's P/E ratio is -209.00. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KEEPLEARN.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs TREEHOUSE.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 291.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while TREEHOUSE.NS trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas TREEHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TREEHOUSE.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs TREEHOUSE.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while TREEHOUSE.BO trades at ₹7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas TREEHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TREEHOUSE.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs GTECJAINX.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, GTECJAINX.NS has a market cap of 186.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while GTECJAINX.NS trades at ₹18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas GTECJAINX.NS's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTECJAINX.NS's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to GTECJAINX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check GTECJAINX.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs UMESLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, UMESLTD.BO has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while UMESLTD.BO trades at ₹5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas UMESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UMESLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to UMESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check UMESLTD.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs UMESLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, UMESLTD.NS has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while UMESLTD.NS trades at ₹5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas UMESLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UMESLTD.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to UMESLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check UMESLTD.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs MTEDUCARE.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.NS has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while MTEDUCARE.NS trades at ₹1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas MTEDUCARE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTEDUCARE.NS's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs EDUCOMP.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, EDUCOMP.NS has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while EDUCOMP.NS trades at ₹0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas EDUCOMP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDUCOMP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to EDUCOMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check EDUCOMP.NS's competition here
PWL.NS vs MTEDUCARE.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.BO has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while MTEDUCARE.BO trades at ₹1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas MTEDUCARE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTEDUCARE.BO's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs EDUCOMP.BO Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, EDUCOMP.BO has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while EDUCOMP.BO trades at ₹0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas EDUCOMP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDUCOMP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is less volatile compared to EDUCOMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check EDUCOMP.BO's competition here
PWL.NS vs DALALSTCOM.NS Comparison May 2026
PWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWL.NS stands at 313.5B. In comparison, DALALSTCOM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWL.NS is priced at ₹110.99, while DALALSTCOM.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.96, whereas DALALSTCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, PWL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DALALSTCOM.NS's ROE of +529.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PWL.NS is more volatile compared to DALALSTCOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWL.NS.Check DALALSTCOM.NS's competition here