LCC Infotech Limited
LCC Infotech Limited (LCCINFOTEC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCCINFOTEC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCCINFOTEC.NS | ₹4.24 | -5.99% | 543.1M | -47.67 | -₹0.09 | N/A |
| PWL.BO | ₹112.05 | +2.00% | 317.4B | -130.59 | -₹0.85 | N/A |
| PWL.NS | ₹112.03 | +2.20% | 317.4B | -132.13 | -₹0.84 | N/A |
| CRIZAC.BO | ₹239.35 | +17.44% | 39.2B | 20.41 | ₹10.98 | +3.57% |
| CRIZAC.NS | ₹238.84 | +17.29% | 39.2B | 20.40 | ₹10.98 | +3.57% |
| NIITMTS.NS | ₹216.35 | +2.73% | 30.2B | 12.41 | ₹17.67 | +1.37% |
| NIITMTS.BO | ₹216.80 | +2.99% | 30.1B | 12.37 | ₹17.67 | +1.37% |
| VERANDA.NS | ₹237.24 | -1.74% | 22.9B | 24.62 | ₹9.66 | N/A |
| VERANDA.BO | ₹237.85 | -1.53% | 22.9B | 24.66 | ₹9.64 | N/A |
| NIITLTD.NS | ₹67.86 | +2.63% | 9.4B | 41.29 | ₹1.67 | +1.45% |
Stock Comparison
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs PWL.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, PWL.BO has a market cap of 317.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while PWL.BO trades at ₹112.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas PWL.BO's P/E ratio is -130.59. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to PWL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to PWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check PWL.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs PWL.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, PWL.NS has a market cap of 317.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while PWL.NS trades at ₹112.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas PWL.NS's P/E ratio is -132.13. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to PWL.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to PWL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check PWL.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs CRIZAC.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CRIZAC.BO has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while CRIZAC.BO trades at ₹239.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas CRIZAC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CRIZAC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to CRIZAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check CRIZAC.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs CRIZAC.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CRIZAC.NS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while CRIZAC.NS trades at ₹238.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas CRIZAC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CRIZAC.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to CRIZAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check CRIZAC.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs NIITMTS.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, NIITMTS.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while NIITMTS.NS trades at ₹216.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas NIITMTS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NIITMTS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check NIITMTS.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs NIITMTS.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, NIITMTS.BO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while NIITMTS.BO trades at ₹216.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas NIITMTS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NIITMTS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check NIITMTS.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs VERANDA.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, VERANDA.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while VERANDA.NS trades at ₹237.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas VERANDA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VERANDA.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to VERANDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check VERANDA.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs VERANDA.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, VERANDA.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while VERANDA.BO trades at ₹237.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas VERANDA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VERANDA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to VERANDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check VERANDA.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs NIITLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, NIITLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while NIITLTD.NS trades at ₹67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas NIITLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NIITLTD.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check NIITLTD.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs NIITLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, NIITLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while NIITLTD.BO trades at ₹67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas NIITLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NIITLTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check NIITLTD.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs APTECHT.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, APTECHT.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while APTECHT.BO trades at ₹111.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas APTECHT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to APTECHT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to APTECHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check APTECHT.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs APTECHT.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, APTECHT.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while APTECHT.NS trades at ₹111.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas APTECHT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to APTECHT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to APTECHT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check APTECHT.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs GLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while GLOBAL.NS trades at ₹100.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas GLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to GLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check GLOBAL.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs CLEDUCATE.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while CLEDUCATE.NS trades at ₹46.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas CLEDUCATE.NS's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CLEDUCATE.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs CLEDUCATE.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while CLEDUCATE.BO trades at ₹46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas CLEDUCATE.BO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CLEDUCATE.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs ZEELEARN.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while ZEELEARN.BO trades at ₹6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas ZEELEARN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ZEELEARN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to ZEELEARN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check ZEELEARN.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs ZEELEARN.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while ZEELEARN.NS trades at ₹6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas ZEELEARN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ZEELEARN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to ZEELEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check ZEELEARN.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs GOLDENCREST.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GOLDENCREST.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while GOLDENCREST.BO trades at ₹331.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas GOLDENCREST.BO's P/E ratio is 1951.18. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GOLDENCREST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDENCREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check GOLDENCREST.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs COMPUSOFT.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while COMPUSOFT.NS trades at ₹13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas COMPUSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 39.35. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to COMPUSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs COMPUSOFT.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while COMPUSOFT.BO trades at ₹13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas COMPUSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to COMPUSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs KEERTI.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KEERTI.NS has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while KEERTI.NS trades at ₹71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas KEERTI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to KEERTI.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to KEERTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check KEERTI.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.BO has a market cap of 565.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while LCCINFOTEC.BO trades at ₹4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas LCCINFOTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -34.38. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs KEEPLEARN.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.BO has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while KEEPLEARN.BO trades at ₹2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas KEEPLEARN.BO's P/E ratio is -215.00. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to KEEPLEARN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs KEEPLEARN.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.NS has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while KEEPLEARN.NS trades at ₹2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas KEEPLEARN.NS's P/E ratio is -209.00. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to KEEPLEARN.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs TREEHOUSE.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 296.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while TREEHOUSE.BO trades at ₹6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas TREEHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to TREEHOUSE.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs TREEHOUSE.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while TREEHOUSE.NS trades at ₹6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas TREEHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to TREEHOUSE.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs GTECJAINX.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GTECJAINX.NS has a market cap of 187.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while GTECJAINX.NS trades at ₹18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas GTECJAINX.NS's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GTECJAINX.NS's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to GTECJAINX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check GTECJAINX.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs UMESLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, UMESLTD.BO has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while UMESLTD.BO trades at ₹5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas UMESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to UMESLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to UMESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check UMESLTD.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs UMESLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, UMESLTD.NS has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while UMESLTD.NS trades at ₹5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas UMESLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to UMESLTD.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to UMESLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check UMESLTD.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs EDUCOMP.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.BO has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while EDUCOMP.BO trades at ₹0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas EDUCOMP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to EDUCOMP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to EDUCOMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check EDUCOMP.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs EDUCOMP.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.NS has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while EDUCOMP.NS trades at ₹0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas EDUCOMP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to EDUCOMP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to EDUCOMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check EDUCOMP.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs MTEDUCARE.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.NS has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while MTEDUCARE.NS trades at ₹1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas MTEDUCARE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MTEDUCARE.NS's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is less volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.NS's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs MTEDUCARE.BO Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.BO has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while MTEDUCARE.BO trades at ₹1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas MTEDUCARE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MTEDUCARE.BO's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.BO's competition here
LCCINFOTEC.NS vs DALALSTCOM.NS Comparison May 2026
LCCINFOTEC.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCCINFOTEC.NS stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DALALSTCOM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCCINFOTEC.NS is priced at ₹4.24, while DALALSTCOM.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCCINFOTEC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -47.67, whereas DALALSTCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE is -1.66%, compared to DALALSTCOM.NS's ROE of +529.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LCCINFOTEC.NS is more volatile compared to DALALSTCOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCCINFOTEC.NS.Check DALALSTCOM.NS's competition here