TechTarget, Inc.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.03T. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GOOG trades at $167.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.03T. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GOOGL trades at $166.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.61T. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while META trades at $640.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas META's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 133.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SPOT trades at $664.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 106.66. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 85.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while DASH trades at $202.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 255.92. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 31.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while BIDU trades at $89.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TME trades at $16.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 21.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while PINS trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 19.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while RDDT trades at $107.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TWLO trades at $116.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -505.02. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ZG trades at $66.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -190.97. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while Z trades at $67.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -193.69. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SNAP trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -28.03. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT and SNAP have similar daily volatility (4.41).

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while NBIS trades at $37.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -26.83. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while MTCH trades at $29.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while DJT trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while DJTWW trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -35.35. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while CARG trades at $32.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.57. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while IAC trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while YELP trades at $38.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GENI trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -52.71. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while DOYU trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while WB trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while NN trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while FVRR trades at $31.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 65.69. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TBLA trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GRPN trades at $26.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TBLAW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 997.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while MOMO trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 867.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while EVER trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 815.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while OPRA trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 803.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ANGI trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 750.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GETY trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 750.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ATHM trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 713.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while NNAVW trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 696.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while MAX trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 650.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SSTK trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 608.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SMWB trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -33.41. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 600.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while THRY trades at $13.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 556.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while KIND trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 492.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while PERI trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -60.78. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 464.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while AREN trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is -44.39. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 343.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ZH trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 328.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TRVG trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 259.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while OB trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 249.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SEAT trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -64.00. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 174.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ILLR trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 159.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of -46.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 145.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TRUE trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 109.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while JOYY trades at $42.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 94.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ASST trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 80.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while JFIN trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 71.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while BZFD trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 69.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while CCG trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 54.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GIFT trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 50.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while PODC trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 48.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while IZEA trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT and IZEA have similar daily volatility (4.41).

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 35.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SEATW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 31.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while MNY trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 30.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ZDGE trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 25.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while BODI trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 23.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SCOR trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 13.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while UPXI trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while KRKR trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 10.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while NAMI trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LCFYW trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -77.79. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LCFY trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ONFO trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SLE trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while CRTD trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while CMCM trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 974205.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while ONFOW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 232867.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while FENG trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 31438.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while SOGP trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9173.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while TC trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8119.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.

TTGT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTGT stands at 584.49M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTGT is priced at $8.18, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTGT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.22, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTGT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TTGT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTGT.