Tessenderlo Group NV
Tessenderlo Group NV (TSDOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TSDOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSDOF | $35.50 | +40.98% | 2.1B | 44.38 | $0.80 | +2.42% |
| CBLUY | $11.19 | +0.00% | 51.6B | 6.18 | $1.81 | +6.10% |
| YARIY | $28.90 | -0.21% | 29.4B | 10.48 | $2.75 | +0.86% |
| PHOJY | $22.09 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 3.99 | $5.53 | N/A |
| YRAIF | $57.50 | +0.00% | 14.6B | 10.45 | $5.50 | +0.86% |
| KPLUF | $20.70 | +14.05% | 3.7B | -2.93 | -$7.06 | +0.81% |
| SNFRF | $0.24 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 11.76 | $0.02 | +4.42% |
| CBLUF | $0.34 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 11.33 | $0.03 | +4.94% |
| SNFRY | $8.43 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 7.53 | $1.12 | +6.16% |
| NUFMF | $1.75 | +2.94% | 672.3M | -5.65 | -$0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TSDOF vs CBLUY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while CBLUY trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to CBLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check CBLUY's competition here
TSDOF vs YARIY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while YARIY trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check YARIY's competition here
TSDOF vs PHOJY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to PHOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check PHOJY's competition here
TSDOF vs YRAIF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while YRAIF trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to YRAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check YRAIF's competition here
TSDOF vs KPLUF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KPLUF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while KPLUF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas KPLUF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KPLUF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to KPLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check KPLUF's competition here
TSDOF vs SNFRF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while SNFRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check SNFRF's competition here
TSDOF vs CBLUF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while CBLUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to CBLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check CBLUF's competition here
TSDOF vs SNFRY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while SNFRY trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to SNFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check SNFRY's competition here
TSDOF vs NUFMF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NUFMF has a market cap of 672.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while NUFMF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas NUFMF's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NUFMF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to NUFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check NUFMF's competition here
TSDOF vs BWEL Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while BWEL trades at $558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BWEL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check BWEL's competition here
TSDOF vs MBCF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while MBCF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check MBCF's competition here
TSDOF vs DNKLY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check DNKLY's competition here
TSDOF vs FTZZF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while FTZZF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check FTZZF's competition here
TSDOF vs EMSNF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to EMSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check EMSNF's competition here
TSDOF vs PLHCF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to PLHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check PLHCF's competition here
TSDOF vs VNPKF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while VNPKF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to VNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check VNPKF's competition here
TSDOF vs KNGW Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while KNGW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to KNGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check KNGW's competition here
TSDOF vs HMIFF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to HMIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check HMIFF's competition here
TSDOF vs EDNSF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EDNSF has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while EDNSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas EDNSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EDNSF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to EDNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check EDNSF's competition here
TSDOF vs MGROF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while MGROF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to MGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check MGROF's competition here
TSDOF vs VVIVF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while VVIVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to VVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check VVIVF's competition here
TSDOF vs KRLTF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while KRLTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to KRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check KRLTF's competition here
TSDOF vs ARLSF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while ARLSF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check ARLSF's competition here
TSDOF vs LBTD Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while LBTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check LBTD's competition here
TSDOF vs APEOF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while APEOF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APEOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to APEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check APEOF's competition here
TSDOF vs PTAM Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 297.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while PTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to PTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check PTAM's competition here
TSDOF vs EACTF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 289.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while EACTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to EACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check EACTF's competition here
TSDOF vs HUMT Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 255.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while HUMT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to HUMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check HUMT's competition here
TSDOF vs BLONF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 194.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while BLONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to BLONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check BLONF's competition here
TSDOF vs ENFY Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 157.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while ENFY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check ENFY's competition here
TSDOF vs AGYP Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 79.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while AGYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to AGYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check AGYP's competition here
TSDOF vs MAAFF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check MAAFF's competition here
TSDOF vs KWBT Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while KWBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to KWBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check KWBT's competition here
TSDOF vs BEVVF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while BEVVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to BEVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check BEVVF's competition here
TSDOF vs IGNE Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 15.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while IGNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check IGNE's competition here
TSDOF vs KGET Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while KGET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to KGET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check KGET's competition here
TSDOF vs ALGWF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while ALGWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check ALGWF's competition here
TSDOF vs HFGVF Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check HFGVF's competition here
TSDOF vs SLCO Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while SLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLCO's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to SLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check SLCO's competition here
TSDOF vs BIONQ Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BIONQ has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while BIONQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas BIONQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BIONQ's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to BIONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check BIONQ's competition here
TSDOF vs YUII Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YUII has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while YUII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas YUII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YUII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to YUII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check YUII's competition here
TSDOF vs ITRO Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while ITRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to ITRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check ITRO's competition here
TSDOF vs NOEC Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while NOEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOEC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check NOEC's competition here
TSDOF vs PHOS Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while PHOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to PHOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check PHOS's competition here
TSDOF vs GREN Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 434. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while GREN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GREN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check GREN's competition here
TSDOF vs QCCP Comparison April 2026
TSDOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSDOF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QCCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TSDOF is priced at $35.50, while QCCP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 44.38, whereas QCCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSDOF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QCCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TSDOF is more volatile compared to QCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSDOF.Check QCCP's competition here