Fuchs Petrolub SE
Fuchs Petrolub SE (FUPBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FUPBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUPBY | $10.99 | -1.08% | 5.8B | 16.65 | $0.66 | +3.24% |
| AIQUY | $41.34 | +0.12% | 119.2B | 28.88 | $1.43 | +1.81% |
| AIQUF | $205.80 | +2.47% | 117.8B | 28.54 | $7.14 | +1.82% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.09% |
| GVDNY | $70.90 | +0.35% | 32.7B | 23.92 | $2.96 | +2.58% |
| GVDBF | $3,355.61 | -3.16% | 31B | 22.70 | $147.83 | +2.71% |
| AKZOY | $19.25 | -2.14% | 29.6B | 13.55 | $1.42 | +3.96% |
| SXYAY | $18.00 | -1.40% | 28.9B | 21.45 | $0.84 | +2.31% |
| SKFOF | $178.31 | -4.24% | 28.8B | 21.52 | $8.34 | +1.29% |
| NVZMF | $61.83 | +0.34% | 27.7B | 39.61 | $1.50 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
FUPBY vs AIQUY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AIQUY trades at $41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AIQUY's competition here
FUPBY vs AIQUF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AIQUF trades at $205.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AIQUF's competition here
FUPBY vs PTPIF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check PTPIF's competition here
FUPBY vs GVDNY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while GVDNY trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check GVDNY's competition here
FUPBY vs GVDBF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while GVDBF trades at $3,355.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check GVDBF's competition here
FUPBY vs AKZOY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AKZOY trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AKZOY's competition here
FUPBY vs SXYAY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SXYAY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SXYAY's competition here
FUPBY vs SKFOF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SKFOF trades at $178.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SKFOF's competition here
FUPBY vs NVZMF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NVZMF trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NVZMF's competition here
FUPBY vs NVZMY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NVZMY trades at $59.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NVZMY's competition here
FUPBY vs PTCAY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while PTCAY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check PTCAY's competition here
FUPBY vs EMSHF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while EMSHF trades at $895.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check EMSHF's competition here
FUPBY vs DALQF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check DALQF's competition here
FUPBY vs CVVTF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CVVTF trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CVVTF's competition here
FUPBY vs COVTY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while COVTY trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check COVTY's competition here
FUPBY vs NPCPF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NPCPF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NPCPF's competition here
FUPBY vs NDEKF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NDEKF trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NDEKF's competition here
FUPBY vs NDEKY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NDEKY trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NDEKY's competition here
FUPBY vs SYIEF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SYIEF trades at $88.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SYIEF's competition here
FUPBY vs SYIEY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SYIEY trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SYIEY's competition here
FUPBY vs BNTGY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while BNTGY trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check BNTGY's competition here
FUPBY vs CRTSF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CRTSF's competition here
FUPBY vs BNTGF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while BNTGF trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check BNTGF's competition here
FUPBY vs CHYHY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CHYHY's competition here
FUPBY vs EVKIF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while EVKIF trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check EVKIF's competition here
FUPBY vs EVKIY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while EVKIY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check EVKIY's competition here
FUPBY vs AKZOF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AKZOF trades at $56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AKZOF's competition here
FUPBY vs SCVPY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SCVPY trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SCVPY's competition here
FUPBY vs SCVUF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SCVUF's competition here
FUPBY vs SASOF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SASOF trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is 57.52. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SASOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SASOF's competition here
FUPBY vs ASGLY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ASGLY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ASGLY's competition here
FUPBY vs ASGLF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ASGLF trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ASGLF's competition here
FUPBY vs OCLDY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while OCLDY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check OCLDY's competition here
FUPBY vs IMDZF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while IMDZF trades at $108.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check IMDZF's competition here
FUPBY vs OCLDF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while OCLDF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check OCLDF's competition here
FUPBY vs WKCMF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while WKCMF trades at $117.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check WKCMF's competition here
FUPBY vs ARKAY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ARKAY trades at $73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 122.93. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ARKAY's competition here
FUPBY vs COIHF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while COIHF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check COIHF's competition here
FUPBY vs COIHY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while COIHY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 63.23. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check COIHY's competition here
FUPBY vs FUPPF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while FUPPF trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check FUPPF's competition here
FUPBY vs FUPEF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check FUPEF's competition here
FUPBY vs MBGCF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while MBGCF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is -105.98. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check MBGCF's competition here
FUPBY vs ARKAF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ARKAF trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 108.80. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ARKAF's competition here
FUPBY vs JMPLY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while JMPLY trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is -46.76. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check JMPLY's competition here
FUPBY vs MITUF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while MITUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check MITUF's competition here
FUPBY vs KDSKF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check KDSKF's competition here
FUPBY vs JMPLF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while JMPLF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is -41.46. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check JMPLF's competition here
FUPBY vs MITUY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while MITUY trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check MITUY's competition here
FUPBY vs NOFCF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NOFCF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NOFCF's competition here
FUPBY vs ICPVF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ICPVF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ICPVF's competition here
FUPBY vs HXXPY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check HXXPY's competition here
FUPBY vs CLZNF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CLZNF trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CLZNF's competition here
FUPBY vs CLZNY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CLZNY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CLZNY's competition here
FUPBY vs AWTRF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AWTRF trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AWTRF's competition here
FUPBY vs AZLGF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AZLGF trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AZLGF's competition here
FUPBY vs KSANF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while KSANF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check KSANF's competition here
FUPBY vs KPTCY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while KPTCY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check KPTCY's competition here
FUPBY vs VBVBF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while VBVBF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check VBVBF's competition here
FUPBY vs INCZY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check INCZY's competition here
FUPBY vs KPLIF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while KPLIF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check KPLIF's competition here
FUPBY vs FPLSF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while FPLSF trades at $28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check FPLSF's competition here
FUPBY vs HXPLF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while HXPLF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check HXPLF's competition here
FUPBY vs TKKYY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TKKYY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TKKYY's competition here
FUPBY vs DACHF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while DACHF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check DACHF's competition here
FUPBY vs ALZCF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ALZCF trades at $202.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ALZCF's competition here
FUPBY vs ELKEF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ELKEF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ELKEF's competition here
FUPBY vs BRRDF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while BRRDF trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check BRRDF's competition here
FUPBY vs LNXSY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while LNXSY trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check LNXSY's competition here
FUPBY vs ZEOOY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ZEOOY's competition here
FUPBY vs KANKF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while KANKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check KANKF's competition here
FUPBY vs IRLCF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while IRLCF trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check IRLCF's competition here
FUPBY vs LNXSF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while LNXSF trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check LNXSF's competition here
FUPBY vs ZEOOF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ZEOOF's competition here
FUPBY vs TKYMY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TKYMY trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TKYMY's competition here
FUPBY vs HUABF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while HUABF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -50.09. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check HUABF's competition here
FUPBY vs HUIHY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while HUIHY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check HUIHY's competition here
FUPBY vs TKYMF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TKYMF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TKYMF's competition here
FUPBY vs ALPKF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ALPKF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ALPKF's competition here
FUPBY vs TKCBF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TKCBF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TKCBF's competition here
FUPBY vs CSNVY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CSNVY trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CSNVY's competition here
FUPBY vs CSNVF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CSNVF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CSNVF's competition here
FUPBY vs TKCBY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TKCBY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TKCBY's competition here
FUPBY vs EMNSF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while EMNSF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check EMNSF's competition here
FUPBY vs CUYRF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while CUYRF trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check CUYRF's competition here
FUPBY vs ELMTY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while ELMTY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check ELMTY's competition here
FUPBY vs LNTEF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check LNTEF's competition here
FUPBY vs NOPMF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 919.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NOPMF trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -92.08. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NOPMF's competition here
FUPBY vs OCINF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 902.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while OCINF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check OCINF's competition here
FUPBY vs SKKAF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SKKAF trades at $66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SKKAF's competition here
FUPBY vs HASGF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check HASGF's competition here
FUPBY vs UNIKF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, UNIKF has a market cap of 795.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while UNIKF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas UNIKF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIKF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to UNIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check UNIKF's competition here
FUPBY vs SYCHF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check SYCHF's competition here
FUPBY vs VTXPF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 715.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while VTXPF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check VTXPF's competition here
FUPBY vs TYOBY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TYOBY's competition here
FUPBY vs AECLY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while AECLY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check AECLY's competition here
FUPBY vs TNMAF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check TNMAF's competition here
FUPBY vs DLNDY Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 405.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while DLNDY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check DLNDY's competition here
FUPBY vs FLRAF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while FLRAF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 118.00. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check FLRAF's competition here
FUPBY vs NCRBF Comparison May 2026
FUPBY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUPBY stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUPBY is priced at $10.99, while NCRBF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUPBY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.65, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FUPBY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUPBY is less volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUPBY.Check NCRBF's competition here