Tokai Carbon Co., Ltd.
Tokai Carbon Co., Ltd. (TKCBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TKCBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCBF | $6.35 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 10.58 | $0.60 | +3.14% |
| AIQUF | $207.35 | +0.76% | 119.7B | 29.04 | $7.14 | +1.78% |
| AIQUY | $41.40 | +0.15% | 119.1B | 28.87 | $1.43 | +1.80% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.09% |
| GVDBF | $3,481.00 | +3.74% | 32.1B | 23.55 | $147.83 | +2.61% |
| GVDNY | $68.52 | -3.36% | 31.6B | 23.06 | $2.97 | +2.66% |
| AKZOY | $19.32 | +0.36% | 29.7B | 13.60 | $1.42 | +3.95% |
| SXYAY | $18.02 | +0.11% | 28.9B | 21.43 | $0.84 | +2.31% |
| SKFOF | $178.31 | -4.24% | 28.6B | 21.33 | $8.36 | +1.30% |
| NVZMF | $61.25 | -0.94% | 28.6B | 40.56 | $1.51 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
TKCBF vs AIQUF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AIQUF trades at $207.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AIQUF's competition here
TKCBF vs AIQUY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AIQUY trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AIQUY's competition here
TKCBF vs PTPIF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check PTPIF's competition here
TKCBF vs GVDBF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while GVDBF trades at $3,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check GVDBF's competition here
TKCBF vs GVDNY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while GVDNY trades at $68.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check GVDNY's competition here
TKCBF vs AKZOY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AKZOY trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AKZOY's competition here
TKCBF vs SXYAY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SXYAY trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SXYAY's competition here
TKCBF vs SKFOF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SKFOF trades at $178.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SKFOF's competition here
TKCBF vs NVZMF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NVZMF trades at $61.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NVZMF's competition here
TKCBF vs NVZMY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NVZMY trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 39.20. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NVZMY's competition here
TKCBF vs PTCAY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while PTCAY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check PTCAY's competition here
TKCBF vs EMSHF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while EMSHF trades at $877.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check EMSHF's competition here
TKCBF vs DALQF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check DALQF's competition here
TKCBF vs CVVTF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CVVTF trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -17.70. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CVVTF's competition here
TKCBF vs COVTY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while COVTY trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check COVTY's competition here
TKCBF vs NPCPF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NPCPF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NPCPF's competition here
TKCBF vs NDEKF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NDEKF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NDEKF's competition here
TKCBF vs NDEKY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NDEKY trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NDEKY's competition here
TKCBF vs SYIEF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SYIEF trades at $88.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SYIEF's competition here
TKCBF vs SYIEY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SYIEY trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 41.61. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SYIEY's competition here
TKCBF vs CRTSF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CRTSF's competition here
TKCBF vs BNTGF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while BNTGF trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check BNTGF's competition here
TKCBF vs CHYHY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CHYHY's competition here
TKCBF vs BNTGY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while BNTGY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check BNTGY's competition here
TKCBF vs EVKIF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while EVKIF trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check EVKIF's competition here
TKCBF vs AKZOF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AKZOF trades at $56.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AKZOF's competition here
TKCBF vs SCVPY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SCVPY trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SCVPY's competition here
TKCBF vs EVKIY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while EVKIY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check EVKIY's competition here
TKCBF vs SCVUF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SCVUF's competition here
TKCBF vs SASOF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SASOF trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is 57.52. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SASOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SASOF's competition here
TKCBF vs ASGLY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ASGLY trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ASGLY's competition here
TKCBF vs ASGLF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ASGLF trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ASGLF's competition here
TKCBF vs OCLDY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while OCLDY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check OCLDY's competition here
TKCBF vs IMDZF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while IMDZF trades at $108.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check IMDZF's competition here
TKCBF vs OCLDF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while OCLDF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check OCLDF's competition here
TKCBF vs FUPBY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while FUPBY trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check FUPBY's competition here
TKCBF vs WKCMF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while WKCMF trades at $113.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check WKCMF's competition here
TKCBF vs ARKAY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ARKAY trades at $73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 123.12. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ARKAY's competition here
TKCBF vs COIHF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while COIHF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check COIHF's competition here
TKCBF vs COIHY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while COIHY trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check COIHY's competition here
TKCBF vs FUPPF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while FUPPF trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check FUPPF's competition here
TKCBF vs FUPEF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check FUPEF's competition here
TKCBF vs MBGCF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while MBGCF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is -105.98. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check MBGCF's competition here
TKCBF vs ARKAF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ARKAF trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 108.80. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ARKAF's competition here
TKCBF vs JMPLY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while JMPLY trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is -47.60. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check JMPLY's competition here
TKCBF vs MITUF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while MITUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check MITUF's competition here
TKCBF vs KDSKF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check KDSKF's competition here
TKCBF vs JMPLF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while JMPLF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is -41.46. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check JMPLF's competition here
TKCBF vs MITUY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while MITUY trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check MITUY's competition here
TKCBF vs NOFCF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NOFCF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NOFCF's competition here
TKCBF vs ICPVF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ICPVF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ICPVF's competition here
TKCBF vs HXXPY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check HXXPY's competition here
TKCBF vs AWTRF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AWTRF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 49.17. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AWTRF's competition here
TKCBF vs CLZNF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CLZNF trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CLZNF's competition here
TKCBF vs CLZNY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CLZNY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is -31.70. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CLZNY's competition here
TKCBF vs AZLGF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AZLGF trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AZLGF's competition here
TKCBF vs KSANF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while KSANF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check KSANF's competition here
TKCBF vs KPTCY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while KPTCY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check KPTCY's competition here
TKCBF vs VBVBF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while VBVBF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check VBVBF's competition here
TKCBF vs INCZY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check INCZY's competition here
TKCBF vs FPLSF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while FPLSF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check FPLSF's competition here
TKCBF vs KPLIF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while KPLIF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check KPLIF's competition here
TKCBF vs HXPLF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while HXPLF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check HXPLF's competition here
TKCBF vs TKKYY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TKKYY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TKKYY's competition here
TKCBF vs DACHF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while DACHF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check DACHF's competition here
TKCBF vs ALZCF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ALZCF trades at $202.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ALZCF's competition here
TKCBF vs ELKEF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ELKEF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ELKEF's competition here
TKCBF vs BRRDF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while BRRDF trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check BRRDF's competition here
TKCBF vs LNXSY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while LNXSY trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check LNXSY's competition here
TKCBF vs ZEOOY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ZEOOY's competition here
TKCBF vs KANKF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while KANKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check KANKF's competition here
TKCBF vs IRLCF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while IRLCF trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check IRLCF's competition here
TKCBF vs LNXSF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while LNXSF trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check LNXSF's competition here
TKCBF vs ZEOOF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ZEOOF's competition here
TKCBF vs TKYMY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TKYMY trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TKYMY's competition here
TKCBF vs HUABF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while HUABF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -50.09. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check HUABF's competition here
TKCBF vs HUIHY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while HUIHY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check HUIHY's competition here
TKCBF vs TKYMF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TKYMF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TKYMF's competition here
TKCBF vs ALPKF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ALPKF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ALPKF's competition here
TKCBF vs CSNVY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CSNVY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CSNVY's competition here
TKCBF vs CSNVF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CSNVF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CSNVF's competition here
TKCBF vs TKCBY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TKCBY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TKCBY's competition here
TKCBF vs EMNSF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while EMNSF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check EMNSF's competition here
TKCBF vs CUYRF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while CUYRF trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check CUYRF's competition here
TKCBF vs ELMTY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while ELMTY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check ELMTY's competition here
TKCBF vs LNTEF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check LNTEF's competition here
TKCBF vs NOPMF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 970.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NOPMF trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -97.25. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NOPMF's competition here
TKCBF vs OCINF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 902.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while OCINF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check OCINF's competition here
TKCBF vs SKKAF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SKKAF trades at $66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SKKAF's competition here
TKCBF vs HASGF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check HASGF's competition here
TKCBF vs UNIKF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UNIKF has a market cap of 795.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while UNIKF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas UNIKF's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNIKF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to UNIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check UNIKF's competition here
TKCBF vs SYCHF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check SYCHF's competition here
TKCBF vs VTXPF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 715.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while VTXPF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is -27.38. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check VTXPF's competition here
TKCBF vs TYOBY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TYOBY's competition here
TKCBF vs AECLY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while AECLY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check AECLY's competition here
TKCBF vs DLNDY Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while DLNDY trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check DLNDY's competition here
TKCBF vs TNMAF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check TNMAF's competition here
TKCBF vs FLRAF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while FLRAF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 118.00. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check FLRAF's competition here
TKCBF vs NCRBF Comparison May 2026
TKCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCBF stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCBF is priced at $6.35, while NCRBF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.58, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, TKCBF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCBF is less volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCBF.Check NCRBF's competition here