Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd.
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. TRQ.TO Peers
See (TRQ.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRQ.TO | $42.99 | -0.05% | N/A | 11.91 | $3.61 | N/A |
| FM.TO | $20.19 | -0.10% | 16.72B | 80.76 | $0.25 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | $12.75 | +0.55% | 11.06B | 75.00 | $0.17 | +3.05% |
| CS.TO | $7.13 | -1.32% | 5.43B | -33.93 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | $11.86 | -1.82% | 4.68B | 42.36 | $0.28 | +0.17% |
| ERO.TO | $19.15 | +2.52% | 1.98B | 76.60 | $0.25 | N/A |
| IE.TO | $9.52 | +1.06% | 1.26B | -8.07 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | $2.87 | -0.35% | 906.56M | -13.67 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | $5.78 | +8.85% | 835.77M | 10.70 | $0.54 | N/A |
| III.TO | $3.76 | -1.31% | 608.95M | 5.78 | $0.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRQ.TO vs FM.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 16.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while FM.TO trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 80.76. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 11.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while LUN.TO trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs CS.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while CS.TO trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is -33.93. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while HBM.TO trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while ERO.TO trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 76.60. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs IE.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while IE.TO trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 906.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while TKO.TO trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while AYM.TO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs III.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 608.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while III.TO trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while CMMC.TO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 481.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while MARI.TO trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -23.80. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 298.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while ASCU.TO trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -25.12. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 282.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while ARG.TO trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 164.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while FDY.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while NCU.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while DNT.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while RCLF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRQ.TO has daily volatility of 0.07 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
TRQ.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 16.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while CCI.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704674.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while AFX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.
TRQ.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison
TRQ.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ.TO is priced at $42.99, while JUBA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.91, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TRQ.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.TO.