Majuba Hill Copper Corp. (JUBA.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JUBA.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUBA.CN | CA$0.01 | -33.33% | 681K | -0.25 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| FM.TO | CA$45.12 | -1.23% | 37.4B | -136.73 | -CA$0.33 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$41.23 | +3.46% | 35.3B | 21.25 | CA$1.94 | +0.28% |
| HBM.TO | CA$40.73 | +1.17% | 16.2B | 17.48 | CA$2.33 | +0.07% |
| CS.TO | CA$15.36 | +0.20% | 11.7B | 18.73 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| ERO.TO | CA$42.16 | -1.84% | 4.4B | 10.76 | CA$3.92 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$10.95 | +0.55% | 3.4B | 219.00 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$16.20 | +2.27% | 2.6B | -40.50 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$6.19 | +1.14% | 1.8B | -51.58 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$9.81 | +0.93% | 1.8B | -49.05 | -CA$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JUBA.CN vs FM.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FM.TO trades at CA$45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is -136.73. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check FM.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs LUN.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LUN.TO trades at CA$41.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check LUN.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs HBM.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HBM.TO trades at CA$40.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check HBM.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs CS.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CS.TO trades at CA$15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check CS.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs ERO.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ERO.TO trades at CA$42.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check ERO.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs TKO.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TKO.TO trades at CA$10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check TKO.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs IE.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IE.TO trades at CA$16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check IE.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs FDY.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FDY.TO trades at CA$6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check FDY.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs ASCU.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -49.05. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs III.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while III.TO trades at CA$7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check III.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs ARG.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ARG.TO trades at CA$7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check ARG.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs MARI.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MARI.TO trades at CA$8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check MARI.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs AYM.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN and AYM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYM.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs CMMC.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs GCU.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check GCU.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs ATCU.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs CCI.CN Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check CCI.CN's competition here
JUBA.CN vs NCU.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check NCU.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs DNT.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN and DNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNT.TO's competition here
JUBA.CN vs RCLF.CN Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. JUBA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
JUBA.CN vs AFX.CN Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check AFX.CN's competition here
JUBA.CN vs TRQ.TO Comparison June 2026
JUBA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBA.CN stands at 681K. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JUBA.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, JUBA.CN's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBA.CN is less volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBA.CN.Check TRQ.TO's competition here