First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM.TO | CA$43.39 | +2.77% | 35.9B | -131.48 | -CA$0.33 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$37.86 | +2.69% | 32.4B | 19.52 | CA$1.94 | +0.29% |
| HBM.TO | CA$38.84 | +4.61% | 15.4B | 16.68 | CA$2.33 | +0.08% |
| CS.TO | CA$14.41 | +4.88% | 11B | 18.71 | CA$0.77 | N/A |
| ERO.TO | CA$41.07 | +6.37% | 4.3B | 10.53 | CA$3.90 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$10.47 | +9.98% | 3.3B | 209.40 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$15.66 | +3.98% | 2.5B | -39.15 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$9.37 | +4.69% | 1.7B | -46.85 | -CA$0.20 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$5.66 | +3.10% | 1.7B | -47.17 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| III.TO | CA$7.02 | +5.25% | 1.3B | 9.75 | CA$0.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FM.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while LUN.TO trades at CA$37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while HBM.TO trades at CA$38.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CS.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while CS.TO trades at CA$14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while ERO.TO trades at CA$41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while TKO.TO trades at CA$10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is 209.40. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs IE.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while IE.TO trades at CA$15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -39.15. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -46.85. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while FDY.TO trades at CA$5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -47.17. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs III.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while III.TO trades at CA$7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while MARI.TO trades at CA$7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while ARG.TO trades at CA$6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs GCU.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check GCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ATCU.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FM.TO has daily volatility of 3.36 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison June 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$43.39, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -131.48, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here