Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (III.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III.TO | CA$7.35 | +4.70% | 1.3B | 10.06 | CA$0.72 | N/A |
| FM.TO | CA$45.18 | +4.13% | 37.9B | -138.58 | -CA$0.33 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$41.11 | +8.58% | 34.1B | 20.53 | CA$1.94 | +0.28% |
| HBM.TO | CA$40.79 | +5.02% | 16B | 17.28 | CA$2.33 | +0.07% |
| CS.TO | CA$15.30 | +6.18% | 11.7B | 19.91 | CA$0.77 | N/A |
| ERO.TO | CA$42.48 | +3.43% | 4.5B | 10.98 | CA$3.91 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$10.97 | +4.78% | 3.4B | 217.80 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$16.48 | +5.24% | 2.5B | -39.60 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$6.25 | +10.42% | 1.8B | -51.00 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$9.85 | +5.12% | 1.7B | -51.16 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
III.TO vs FM.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while FM.TO trades at CA$45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is -138.58. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
III.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while LUN.TO trades at CA$41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
III.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while HBM.TO trades at CA$40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
III.TO vs CS.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while CS.TO trades at CA$15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
III.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while ERO.TO trades at CA$42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
III.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while TKO.TO trades at CA$10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is 217.80. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
III.TO vs IE.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while IE.TO trades at CA$16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -39.60. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
III.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while FDY.TO trades at CA$6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
III.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -51.16. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
III.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while MARI.TO trades at CA$8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
III.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while ARG.TO trades at CA$7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
III.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
III.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
III.TO vs GCU.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check GCU.TO's competition here
III.TO vs ATCU.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
III.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
III.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
III.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
III.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. III.TO has daily volatility of 2.46 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
III.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
III.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
III.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison June 2026
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at CA$7.35, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here