Terreno Realty Corporation

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PLD trades at $140.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 39.34. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLD's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA trades at $305.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PK trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PK's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PH trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PH's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while EXR trades at $139.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check EXR's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LSI trades at $133.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LSI's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while EGP trades at $200.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check EGP's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while CUBE trades at $39.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check CUBE's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while REXR-PB trades at $21.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR-PB's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while REXR trades at $35.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while FR trades at $62.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check FR's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LINE trades at $36.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -84.02. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LINE's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while STAG trades at $39.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check STAG's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while REXR-PC trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR-PC's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while RCC trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check RCC's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PF trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PF's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PG trades at $20.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PG's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check GRP-UN's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while COLD trades at $12.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check COLD's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PI trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PI's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while NSA trades at $42.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 62.22. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NSA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PJ's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PL trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PL's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LXP trades at $50.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LXP's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PM trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PM's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PS trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PS's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PR trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PR's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PQ's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LXP-PC trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LXP-PC's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PO trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PO's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PN trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PN's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while NSA-PA trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NSA-PA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NYMTI's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PMTU trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PMTU's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while IIPR trades at $55.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check IIPR's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SCCD trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCD's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SCCF trades at $23.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCF's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SCCE trades at $23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCE's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PLYM trades at $21.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLYM's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while DHCNI trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check DHCNI's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LANDO trades at $20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.53. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LANDO's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 593.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while NHPAP trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NHPAP's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 571.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while TPTA trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check TPTA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while ILPT trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check ILPT's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LAND trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -34.17. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LAND's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PSA-PP trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PP's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while TFSA trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check TFSA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LANDM trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LANDM's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLYM-PA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while MDV trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -52.13. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check MDV's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while AJXA trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check AJXA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SCCB trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCB's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while LPA trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LPA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SACC trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SACC's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while SELF trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SELF's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while IIPR-PA trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check IIPR-PA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while PW-PA trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PW-PA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check MNR-PC's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while QTS trades at $77.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS-PA's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while DRE trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check DRE's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while CONE trades at $90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check CONE's competition here

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.95, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.86, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS-PB's competition here