Terreno Realty Corporation
Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNO | $65.79 | +1.14% | 7B | 16.04 | $4.10 | +3.12% |
| PLD | $142.31 | +1.27% | 132.7B | 35.76 | $3.98 | +2.88% |
| PSA | $296.15 | +1.26% | 52B | 30.59 | $9.68 | +4.06% |
| PSA-PK | $18.69 | +0.13% | 47.3B | 1.82 | $10.29 | +4.06% |
| PSA-PH | $22.44 | -0.22% | 46.4B | 2.18 | $10.29 | +4.06% |
| EXR | $139.27 | +1.73% | 29.4B | 31.29 | $4.45 | +4.66% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
| EGP | $202.16 | +0.70% | 10.9B | 36.78 | $5.50 | +2.99% |
| LINE | $39.09 | +1.66% | 8.9B | -63.05 | -$0.62 | +5.42% |
| CUBE | $38.93 | +1.49% | 8.9B | 27.22 | $1.43 | +5.40% |
Stock Comparison
TRNO vs PLD Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PLD trades at $142.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLD's competition here
TRNO vs PSA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA trades at $296.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PK Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PK trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PK's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PH Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PH trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PH's competition here
TRNO vs EXR Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while EXR trades at $139.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check EXR's competition here
TRNO vs LSI Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LSI's competition here
TRNO vs EGP Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while EGP trades at $202.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check EGP's competition here
TRNO vs LINE Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while LINE trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -63.05. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LINE's competition here
TRNO vs CUBE Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while CUBE trades at $38.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check CUBE's competition here
TRNO vs REXR-PB Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while REXR-PB trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR-PB's competition here
TRNO vs REXR Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while REXR trades at $35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR's competition here
TRNO vs FR Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while FR trades at $61.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check FR's competition here
TRNO vs STAG Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while STAG trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check STAG's competition here
TRNO vs JAN Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while JAN trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -73.97. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check JAN's competition here
TRNO vs REXR-PC Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while REXR-PC trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check REXR-PC's competition here
TRNO vs COLD Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while COLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check COLD's competition here
TRNO vs RCC Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check RCC's competition here
TRNO vs GRP-UN Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check GRP-UN's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PF Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PF trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PF's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PG Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PG trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PG's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PI Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PI trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PI's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PJ Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
TRNO vs NSA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while NSA trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NSA's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PL Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PL trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PL's competition here
TRNO vs LXP Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while LXP trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LXP's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PM Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PM trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PM's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PS Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PS trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PS's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PR Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PR trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PR's competition here
TRNO vs LXP-PC Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while LXP-PC trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LXP-PC's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PQ Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PO Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PO trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PO's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PN Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PN trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PN's competition here
TRNO vs NSA-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while NSA-PA trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NSA-PA's competition here
TRNO vs NYMTI Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check NYMTI's competition here
TRNO vs IIPR Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while IIPR trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check IIPR's competition here
TRNO vs SCCF Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SCCF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCF's competition here
TRNO vs SCCD Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SCCD trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCD's competition here
TRNO vs SCCE Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SCCE trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCE's competition here
TRNO vs PLYM Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLYM's competition here
TRNO vs DHCNI Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 940.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while DHCNI trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check DHCNI's competition here
TRNO vs TPTA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 569.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while TPTA trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check TPTA's competition here
TRNO vs ILPT Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while ILPT trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check ILPT's competition here
TRNO vs PSA-PP Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PSA-PP trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PSA-PP's competition here
TRNO vs TFSA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check TFSA's competition here
TRNO vs MDV Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while MDV trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -44.34. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check MDV's competition here
TRNO vs PLYM-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
TRNO vs AJXA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check AJXA's competition here
TRNO vs SCCB Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SCCB's competition here
TRNO vs LPA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while LPA trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check LPA's competition here
TRNO vs SACC Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SACC's competition here
TRNO vs SELF Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while SELF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check SELF's competition here
TRNO vs IIPR-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
TRNO vs PW-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while PW-PA trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check PW-PA's competition here
TRNO vs QTS-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS-PA's competition here
TRNO vs MNR-PC Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check MNR-PC's competition here
TRNO vs QTS-PB Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS-PB's competition here
TRNO vs CONE Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check CONE's competition here
TRNO vs QTS Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check QTS's competition here
TRNO vs DRE Comparison May 2026
TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 7B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $65.79, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.Check DRE's competition here