CubeSmart (CUBE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUBE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUBE | $39.94 | -2.30% | 9.1B | 15.54 | $2.57 | +5.15% |
| PLD | $141.00 | -1.82% | 131.4B | 25.91 | $5.44 | +2.91% |
| DLR | $176.30 | +0.80% | 63B | 39.52 | $4.46 | +2.80% |
| PSA-PJ | $18.25 | -0.05% | 57.8B | 1.78 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PF | $20.30 | -0.54% | 57.7B | 1.98 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PS | $16.02 | -0.19% | 57.6B | 1.56 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PR | $15.48 | -0.58% | 57.6B | 1.51 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PG | $20.22 | -0.42% | 57.5B | 1.97 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PQ | $15.32 | -0.26% | 57.4B | 1.49 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
| PSA-PO | $15.15 | -0.59% | 57.4B | 1.47 | $10.28 | +3.64% |
Stock Comparison
CUBE vs PLD Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PLD trades at $141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLD's competition here
CUBE vs DLR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while DLR trades at $176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DLR's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PJ Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PF Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PF trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PF's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PS Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PS trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PS's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PR trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PR's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PG Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PG trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PG's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PQ Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PO Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PO trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PO's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PN Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PN trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PN's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PI Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PI trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PI's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PM Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PM trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PM's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PL Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PL trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PL's competition here
CUBE vs PSA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA trades at $320.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PK Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PK trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PK's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PH Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PH trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PH's competition here
CUBE vs EXR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while EXR trades at $143.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EXR's competition here
CUBE vs LSI Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LSI's competition here
CUBE vs EGP Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while EGP trades at $210.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EGP's competition here
CUBE vs LINE Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while LINE trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -69.82. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LINE's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PB Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while REXR-PB trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PB's competition here
CUBE vs FR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while FR trades at $64.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check FR's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PC Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while REXR-PC trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs REXR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while REXR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR's competition here
CUBE vs STAG Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while STAG trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check STAG's competition here
CUBE vs TRNO Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while TRNO trades at $67.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TRNO's competition here
CUBE vs JAN Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while JAN trades at $29.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -81.39. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check JAN's competition here
CUBE vs COLD Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while COLD trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -40.29. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check COLD's competition here
CUBE vs RCC Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check RCC's competition here
CUBE vs GRP-UN Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check GRP-UN's competition here
CUBE vs NSA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while NSA trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA's competition here
CUBE vs LXP-PC Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while LXP-PC trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 70.73. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP-PC's competition here
CUBE vs LXP Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while LXP trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP's competition here
CUBE vs NYMTI Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NYMTI's competition here
CUBE vs NSA-PA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while NSA-PA trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA-PA's competition here
CUBE vs DHCNI Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while DHCNI trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DHCNI's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while IIPR trades at $62.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR's competition here
CUBE vs SCCF Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SCCF trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is -397.03. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCF's competition here
CUBE vs SCCD Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SCCD trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is -233.51. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCD's competition here
CUBE vs SCCE Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SCCE trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is -230.66. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCE's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM's competition here
CUBE vs JBGS Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 851.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while JBGS trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check JBGS's competition here
CUBE vs TPTA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while TPTA trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TPTA's competition here
CUBE vs ILPT Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 571.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while ILPT trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check ILPT's competition here
CUBE vs TPTS Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TPTS has a market cap of 486.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while TPTS trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas TPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to TPTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TPTS's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PP Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 377.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PSA-PP trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PP's competition here
CUBE vs TFSA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TFSA's competition here
CUBE vs PINE Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PINE trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -225.33. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE and PINE have similar daily volatility (2.17).Check PINE's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM-PA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
CUBE vs MDV Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while MDV trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check MDV's competition here
CUBE vs AJXA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check AJXA's competition here
CUBE vs SCCB Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCB's competition here
CUBE vs SACC Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SACC's competition here
CUBE vs SELF Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while SELF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SELF's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR-PA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
CUBE vs CBSTF Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CBSTF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while CBSTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas CBSTF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSTF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to CBSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check CBSTF's competition here
CUBE vs PW-PA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 344.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while PW-PA trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PW-PA's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PA Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PA's competition here
CUBE vs QTS Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS's competition here
CUBE vs DRE Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DRE's competition here
CUBE vs MNR-PC Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check MNR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PB Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PB's competition here
CUBE vs CONE Comparison July 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.94, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.54, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check CONE's competition here