CubeSmart
CubeSmart (CUBE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUBE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUBE | $39.04 | -1.26% | 8.9B | 26.74 | $1.46 | +5.37% |
| PLD | $140.02 | -1.46% | 130.6B | 39.34 | $3.56 | +2.92% |
| PSA | $305.48 | -0.91% | 53.8B | 34.08 | $9.00 | +3.93% |
| PSA-PK | $18.80 | -0.32% | 47.6B | 1.83 | $10.29 | +3.93% |
| PSA-PH | $22.56 | +0.00% | 46.6B | 2.19 | $10.29 | +3.93% |
| EXR | $139.63 | -1.73% | 29.5B | 30.41 | $4.59 | +4.62% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
| EGP | $200.16 | +1.16% | 10.8B | 36.40 | $5.50 | +3.01% |
| REXR-PB | $21.76 | +0.14% | 8.5B | 24.59 | $0.89 | +4.78% |
| REXR | $35.99 | +1.47% | 8.3B | 38.28 | $0.94 | +4.78% |
Stock Comparison
CUBE vs PLD Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PLD trades at $140.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 39.34. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLD's competition here
CUBE vs PSA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA trades at $305.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PK Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PK trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PK's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PH Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PH trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PH's competition here
CUBE vs EXR Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while EXR trades at $139.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EXR's competition here
CUBE vs LSI Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LSI's competition here
CUBE vs EGP Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while EGP trades at $200.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EGP's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PB Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while REXR-PB trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PB's competition here
CUBE vs REXR Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while REXR trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR's competition here
CUBE vs FR Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while FR trades at $62.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check FR's competition here
CUBE vs LINE Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LINE trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -84.02. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LINE's competition here
CUBE vs STAG Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while STAG trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check STAG's competition here
CUBE vs TRNO Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while TRNO trades at $65.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TRNO's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PC Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while REXR-PC trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs RCC Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check RCC's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PF Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PF's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PG Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PG trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PG's competition here
CUBE vs GRP-UN Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check GRP-UN's competition here
CUBE vs COLD Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while COLD trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check COLD's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PI Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PI trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PI's competition here
CUBE vs NSA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while NSA trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 62.22. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PJ Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PL Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PL trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PL's competition here
CUBE vs LXP Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LXP trades at $50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PM Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PM trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PM's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PS Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PS trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PS's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PR Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PR trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PR's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PQ Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
CUBE vs LXP-PC Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LXP-PC trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP-PC's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PO Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PO trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PO's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PN Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PN trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PN's competition here
CUBE vs NSA-PA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while NSA-PA trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA-PA's competition here
CUBE vs NYMTI Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NYMTI's competition here
CUBE vs PMTU Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PMTU trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PMTU's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while IIPR trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR's competition here
CUBE vs SCCD Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SCCD trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCD's competition here
CUBE vs SCCF Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SCCF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCF's competition here
CUBE vs SCCE Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SCCE trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCE's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM's competition here
CUBE vs DHCNI Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while DHCNI trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DHCNI's competition here
CUBE vs LANDO Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LANDO trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.53. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LANDO's competition here
CUBE vs NHPAP Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 593.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while NHPAP trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NHPAP's competition here
CUBE vs TPTA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 571.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while TPTA trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TPTA's competition here
CUBE vs ILPT Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while ILPT trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check ILPT's competition here
CUBE vs LAND Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LAND trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -34.17. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE and LAND have similar daily volatility (2.31).Check LAND's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PP Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PSA-PP trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PP's competition here
CUBE vs TFSA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TFSA's competition here
CUBE vs LANDM Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LANDM's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM-PA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
CUBE vs MDV Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while MDV trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -52.13. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check MDV's competition here
CUBE vs AJXA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check AJXA's competition here
CUBE vs SCCB Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCB's competition here
CUBE vs LPA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while LPA trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LPA's competition here
CUBE vs SACC Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SACC's competition here
CUBE vs SELF Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while SELF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SELF's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR-PA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while IIPR-PA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
CUBE vs PW-PA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while PW-PA trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PW-PA's competition here
CUBE vs MNR-PC Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check MNR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs DRE Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DRE's competition here
CUBE vs QTS Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PA Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PA's competition here
CUBE vs CONE Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check CONE's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PB Comparison April 2026
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 8.9B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $39.04, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PB's competition here