Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc
Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc (SMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMA | $32.46 | -0.09% | 1.3B | -162.30 | -$0.20 | +4.95% |
| EQIX | $1,108.76 | -0.59% | 109.4B | 80.82 | $13.72 | +1.73% |
| AMT | $178.21 | -0.45% | 83.1B | 32.99 | $5.40 | +3.86% |
| CCI | $86.34 | -1.35% | 37.7B | 36.43 | $2.37 | +4.92% |
| IRM | $116.03 | -0.08% | 34.5B | 241.85 | $0.48 | +2.83% |
| SBAC | $219.47 | -0.06% | 23.3B | 22.37 | $9.81 | +2.09% |
| WY | $25.03 | +0.12% | 18B | 55.62 | $0.45 | +3.36% |
| LAMR | $134.35 | +0.84% | 13.6B | 23.24 | $5.78 | +4.86% |
| GLPI | $47.31 | +1.44% | 13.4B | 16.04 | $2.95 | +6.60% |
| OUT | $30.02 | +0.54% | 5.3B | 36.61 | $0.82 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
SMA vs EQIX Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while EQIX trades at $1,108.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 80.82. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EQIX's competition here
SMA vs AMT Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while AMT trades at $178.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AMT's competition here
SMA vs CCI Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while CCI trades at $86.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CCI's competition here
SMA vs IRM Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while IRM trades at $116.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 241.85. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check IRM's competition here
SMA vs SBAC Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while SBAC trades at $219.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SBAC's competition here
SMA vs WY Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while WY trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 55.62. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check WY's competition here
SMA vs LAMR Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while LAMR trades at $134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LAMR's competition here
SMA vs GLPI Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while GLPI trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check GLPI's competition here
SMA vs OUT Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while OUT trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check OUT's competition here
SMA vs EPR Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while EPR trades at $55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR's competition here
SMA vs TIPRX Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check TIPRX's competition here
SMA vs RYN Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while RYN trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 45.40. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check RYN's competition here
SMA vs PCH Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PCH's competition here
SMA vs UNIT Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while UNIT trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check UNIT's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PE Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while EPR-PE trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PE's competition here
SMA vs CXW Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while CXW trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CXW's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PC Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while EPR-PC trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PC's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PG Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while EPR-PG trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PG's competition here
SMA vs LANDP Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while LANDP trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDP's competition here
SMA vs FPI Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 519.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while FPI trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPI's competition here
SMA vs KRSOX Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while KRSOX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check KRSOX's competition here
SMA vs AFCG Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while AFCG trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AFCG's competition here
SMA vs PW Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while PW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PW's competition here
SMA vs FPO Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while FPO trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas FPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FPO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to FPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPO's competition here
SMA vs FUR Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while FUR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas FUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to FUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FUR's competition here
SMA vs SFC Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while SFC trades at $91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas SFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to SFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SFC's competition here
SMA vs CTT Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CTT's competition here
SMA vs SIR Comparison April 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $32.46, while SIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of -162.30, whereas SIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to SIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SIR's competition here