Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc
Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc (SMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMA | $30.98 | +0.36% | 1.2B | 96.72 | $0.32 | +5.20% |
| EQIX | $1,079.79 | +0.13% | 106.5B | 74.73 | $14.45 | +1.83% |
| AMT | $183.85 | +0.04% | 85.6B | 29.65 | $6.20 | +3.76% |
| DLR | $192.03 | -1.15% | 67.5B | 50.93 | $3.77 | +2.54% |
| DLR-PK | $22.56 | +0.31% | 53.4B | 4.66 | $4.83 | +2.54% |
| CCI | $91.46 | -0.63% | 39.9B | 38.59 | $2.37 | +4.66% |
| IRM | $126.46 | -0.68% | 37.6B | 138.95 | $0.91 | +2.60% |
| VICI | $28.50 | -0.07% | 30.7B | 9.76 | $2.92 | +6.25% |
| SBAC | $205.57 | -1.20% | 21.8B | 21.66 | $9.49 | +2.31% |
| DLR-PJ | $20.16 | -0.30% | 21.6B | 4.17 | $4.83 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
SMA vs EQIX Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while EQIX trades at $1,079.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 74.73. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EQIX's competition here
SMA vs AMT Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while AMT trades at $183.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AMT's competition here
SMA vs DLR Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while DLR trades at $192.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PK Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while DLR-PK trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PK's competition here
SMA vs CCI Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while CCI trades at $91.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CCI's competition here
SMA vs IRM Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while IRM trades at $126.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 138.95. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check IRM's competition here
SMA vs VICI Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while VICI trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check VICI's competition here
SMA vs SBAC Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while SBAC trades at $205.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SBAC's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PJ Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while DLR-PJ trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PJ's competition here
SMA vs LAMR Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while LAMR trades at $153.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LAMR's competition here
SMA vs GLPI Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while GLPI trades at $47.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check GLPI's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PL Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while DLR-PL trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PL's competition here
SMA vs OUT Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while OUT trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check OUT's competition here
SMA vs EPR Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while EPR trades at $58.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR's competition here
SMA vs TIPRX Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check TIPRX's competition here
SMA vs PCH Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PCH's competition here
SMA vs RYN Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while RYN trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check RYN's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PE Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while EPR-PE trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PE's competition here
SMA vs CXW Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while CXW trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CXW's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PC Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while EPR-PC trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PC's competition here
SMA vs BXDC Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BXDC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while BXDC trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas BXDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to BXDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check BXDC's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PG Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while EPR-PG trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PG's competition here
SMA vs LANDO Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 748.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while LANDO trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -71.84. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDO's competition here
SMA vs LANDP Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 737.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while LANDP trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDP's competition here
SMA vs FPI Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 454.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while FPI trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPI's competition here
SMA vs LAND Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while LAND trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LAND's competition here
SMA vs LANDM Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDM's competition here
SMA vs KRSOX Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while KRSOX trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check KRSOX's competition here
SMA vs AFCG Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while AFCG trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AFCG's competition here
SMA vs PW Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while PW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PW's competition here
SMA vs FPO Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while FPO trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas FPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to FPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPO's competition here
SMA vs FUR Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while FUR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas FUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to FUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FUR's competition here
SMA vs SFC Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while SFC trades at $91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas SFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to SFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SFC's competition here
SMA vs SIR Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while SIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas SIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to SIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SIR's competition here
SMA vs CTT Comparison May 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.98, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.72, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CTT's competition here