Trinity Industries, Inc.
Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $26.07 | -2.80% | 2.1B | 14.74 | $1.77 | +4.51% |
| UNP | $220.52 | -4.54% | 131.9B | 19.87 | $11.11 | +2.42% |
| CP | $76.14 | -1.53% | 70.8B | 25.37 | $3.00 | +0.75% |
| CSX | $35.00 | +0.09% | 65.7B | 21.47 | $1.63 | +1.42% |
| NSC | $278.00 | -0.81% | 62.6B | 18.95 | $14.66 | +1.93% |
| CNI | $95.42 | -0.88% | 59.6B | 18.00 | $5.30 | +2.59% |
| WAB | $200.70 | -6.38% | 34.3B | 31.39 | $6.39 | +0.45% |
| GBX | $47.41 | -3.34% | 1.5B | 6.69 | $7.09 | +2.60% |
| FSTR | $24.06 | +1.13% | 254.1M | 7.31 | $3.29 | N/A |
| RAIL | $11.32 | -1.91% | 213.1M | -10.68 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while UNP trades at $220.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check UNP's competition here
TRN vs CP Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while CP trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CP's competition here
TRN vs CSX Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while CSX trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CSX's competition here
TRN vs NSC Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while NSC trades at $278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check NSC's competition here
TRN vs CNI Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while CNI trades at $95.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CNI's competition here
TRN vs WAB Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while WAB trades at $200.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check WAB's competition here
TRN vs GBX Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while GBX trades at $47.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check GBX's competition here
TRN vs FSTR Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while FSTR trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check FSTR's competition here
TRN vs RAIL Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while RAIL trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RAIL's competition here
TRN vs RVSN Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while RVSN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSN's competition here
TRN vs KIQ Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KIQ's competition here
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while RVSNW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSNW's competition here
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU-P's competition here
TRN vs KSU Comparison July 2025
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.07, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU's competition here