Trinity Industries, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRN
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $32.15 | -2.48% | 2.6B | 10.25 | $3.14 | +3.75% |
| UNP | $245.90 | +0.49% | 145.7B | 20.48 | $11.99 | +2.24% |
| CSX | $41.32 | +0.24% | 77.1B | 26.94 | $1.54 | +1.28% |
| CP | $79.95 | +1.24% | 71.4B | 24.46 | $3.25 | +0.83% |
| NSC | $289.19 | +0.41% | 64.7B | 22.60 | $12.76 | +1.87% |
| CNI | $106.17 | +1.91% | 64.3B | 19.28 | $5.45 | +2.47% |
| WAB | $255.58 | +0.66% | 43.4B | 37.18 | $6.83 | +0.42% |
| GBX | $46.90 | -11.07% | 1.5B | 8.39 | $5.77 | +2.62% |
| FSTR | $29.55 | +5.57% | 313M | 43.65 | $0.69 | N/A |
| RAIL | $8.24 | +0.16% | 162M | 7.75 | $1.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while UNP trades at $245.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check UNP's competition here
TRN vs CSX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while CSX trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CSX's competition here
TRN vs CP Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while CP trades at $79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CP's competition here
TRN vs NSC Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while NSC trades at $289.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check NSC's competition here
TRN vs CNI Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while CNI trades at $106.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check CNI's competition here
TRN vs WAB Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while WAB trades at $255.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check WAB's competition here
TRN vs GBX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while GBX trades at $46.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check GBX's competition here
TRN vs FSTR Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 313M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while FSTR trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check FSTR's competition here
TRN vs RAIL Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while RAIL trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RAIL's competition here
TRN vs RVSN Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while RVSN trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSN's competition here
TRN vs KIQ Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KIQ's competition here
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while RVSNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check RVSNW's competition here
TRN vs PWX Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PWX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while PWX trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to PWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PWX's competition here
TRN vs PRL Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check PRL's competition here
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU-P's competition here
TRN vs BNI Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check BNI's competition here
TRN vs KSU Comparison April 2026
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $32.15, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.Check KSU's competition here