Trinity Industries, Inc.
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN Peers
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $26.60 | +2.19% | 2.2B | 15.38 | $1.73 | +4.41% |
| UNP | $229.24 | +1.50% | 137B | 20.63 | $11.11 | +2.35% |
| CP | $78.30 | +1.03% | 72.8B | 25.83 | $3.03 | +0.73% |
| CSX | $35.23 | +2.53% | 66.2B | 20.97 | $1.68 | +1.43% |
| NSC | $280.26 | +1.04% | 63.2B | 19.11 | $14.66 | +1.94% |
| CNI | $100.37 | +0.82% | 63B | 19.30 | $5.20 | +2.48% |
| WAB | $211.89 | +0.96% | 36.3B | 33.22 | $6.38 | +0.43% |
| GBX | $48.71 | +1.48% | 1.5B | 6.87 | $7.09 | +2.54% |
| FSTR | $22.51 | +0.58% | 237.7M | 6.84 | $3.29 | N/A |
| RAIL | $11.32 | +5.30% | 213.1M | -10.68 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while UNP trades at $229.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while CP trades at $78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CSX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while CSX trades at $35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs NSC Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while NSC trades at $280.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CNI Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while CNI trades at $100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs WAB Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while WAB trades at $211.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs GBX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while GBX trades at $48.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs FSTR Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while FSTR trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RAIL Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while RAIL trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSN Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while RVSN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KIQ Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while RVSNW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.60, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.