Trinity Industries, Inc.
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN Peers
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $26.13 | +1.91% | 2.1B | 14.76 | $1.77 | +4.45% |
| UNP | $223.45 | +1.27% | 133.5B | 20.24 | $11.04 | +2.40% |
| CP | $81.89 | +0.04% | 76.2B | 27.30 | $3.00 | +0.67% |
| CNI | $104.98 | -0.56% | 65.9B | 20.19 | $5.20 | +2.34% |
| CSX | $32.23 | +1.54% | 60.5B | 19.18 | $1.68 | +1.55% |
| NSC | $250.70 | +1.53% | 56.5B | 17.10 | $14.66 | +2.16% |
| WAB | $206.24 | +1.01% | 35.3B | 32.28 | $6.39 | +0.44% |
| GBX | $45.80 | +1.18% | 1.4B | 7.29 | $6.28 | +2.67% |
| RAIL | $8.33 | +5.71% | 260.3M | -7.86 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| FSTR | $19.25 | +0.94% | 203.3M | 5.85 | $3.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while UNP trades at $223.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while CP trades at $81.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CNI Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while CNI trades at $104.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CSX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while CSX trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs NSC Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while NSC trades at $250.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs WAB Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while WAB trades at $206.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs GBX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while GBX trades at $45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RAIL Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while RAIL trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs FSTR Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while FSTR trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSN Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while RVSN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KIQ Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while RVSNW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $26.13, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.