Trinity Industries, Inc.
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN Peers
See (TRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRN | $28.82 | +6.70% | 2.3B | 15.63 | $1.77 | +4.19% |
| UNP | $235.96 | +2.56% | 140.7B | 21.22 | $11.10 | +2.27% |
| CP | $81.74 | +3.12% | 74.9B | 26.73 | $3.01 | +0.71% |
| CNI | $105.90 | +1.78% | 65.9B | 20.18 | $5.20 | +2.36% |
| CSX | $33.51 | +2.69% | 62.9B | 19.92 | $1.68 | +1.49% |
| NSC | $262.00 | +2.36% | 59.2B | 17.91 | $14.65 | +2.06% |
| WAB | $212.28 | +1.40% | 35.8B | 32.72 | $6.40 | +0.43% |
| GBX | $56.29 | +22.24% | 1.5B | 7.51 | $6.25 | +2.55% |
| FSTR | $22.81 | +4.30% | 239.7M | 6.90 | $3.29 | N/A |
| RAIL | $8.90 | +3.25% | 161.7M | -8.10 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRN vs UNP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while UNP trades at $235.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CP Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while CP trades at $81.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CNI Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while CNI trades at $105.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs CSX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while CSX trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs NSC Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while NSC trades at $262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs WAB Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while WAB trades at $212.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs GBX Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while GBX trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs FSTR Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while FSTR trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RAIL Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while RAIL trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSN Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while RVSN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KIQ Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KIQ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while KIQ trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas KIQ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIQ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs RVSNW Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while RVSNW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is less volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.
TRN vs KSU-P Comparison
TRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRN stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRN is priced at $28.82, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRN currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TRN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRN is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRN.