Transformers and Rectifiers (India) Limited
Transformers and Rectifiers (India) Limited (TRIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIL.BO | ₹745.95 | +5.00% | 112B | 133.44 | ₹5.59 | +0.07% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹8,118.40 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 48.07 | ₹173.73 | +0.42% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹8,120.50 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 48.04 | ₹173.78 | +0.42% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹724.50 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 99.50 | ₹7.17 | +0.18% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹724.50 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 99.46 | ₹7.17 | +0.18% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,403.80 | +0.00% | 889.2B | 59.71 | ₹23.74 | +0.71% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,402.95 | +0.00% | 888.9B | 59.89 | ₹23.66 | +0.71% |
| KEI.BO | ₹4,782.20 | +0.00% | 473B | 54.83 | ₹90.23 | +0.09% |
| KEI.NS | ₹4,781.00 | +0.00% | 472.6B | 54.71 | ₹90.36 | +0.09% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹10,825.00 | +0.00% | 424.9B | 43.79 | ₹241.59 | +0.48% |
Stock Comparison
TRIL.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹8,118.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹8,120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹724.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹724.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 99.46. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 889.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,403.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.71. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 888.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,402.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs KEI.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 473B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while KEI.BO trades at ₹4,782.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 54.83. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check KEI.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 472.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while KEI.NS trades at ₹4,781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 54.71. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 424.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹10,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.79. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 423B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹10,814.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 278B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹31,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HONAUT.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 277.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹31,600.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹879.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 85.06. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 196.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹700.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 196.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹700.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,502.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹859.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹858.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹682.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹683.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹312.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 47.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹313.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹812.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹812.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HEG.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HEG.BO trades at ₹564.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HEG.NS trades at ₹564.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹302.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹8,433.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹8,429.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs STLTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹165.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 2773.33. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹258.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹257.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹884.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 64.99. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹883.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 65.20. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹302.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹301.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,762.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹319.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,425.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,423.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,413.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 47.17. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹139.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.28. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,414.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹325.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 51.62. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹324.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹681.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹677.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HPL.NS trades at ₹346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HPL.BO trades at ₹346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,395.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹1,513.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹1,511.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹277.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹278.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹94.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹94.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹661.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹660.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹151.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹245.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹132.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹557.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while WSI.NS trades at ₹72.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RMC.BO trades at ₹432.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹138.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹139.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.53. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹486.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹324.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹637.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹642.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹2,359.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DEL.BO trades at ₹184.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.71. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹840.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹335.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -47.94. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹333.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -47.20. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PANAENERG.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PANAENERG.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PANAENERG.BO trades at ₹298.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PANAENERG.BO's P/E ratio is 76.64. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANAENERG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PANAENERG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PANAENERG.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PANCARBON.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹471.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹168.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹168.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VETO.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VETO.BO trades at ₹106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VETO.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VETO.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VETO.NS trades at ₹106.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VETO.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs LAKSELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, LAKSELEC.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while LAKSELEC.BO trades at ₹751.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas LAKSELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 69.25. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAKSELEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check LAKSELEC.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs APLAB.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PLAZACABLE.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PLAZACABLE.BO trades at ₹38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PLAZACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAZACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PLAZACABLE.NS Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PLAZACABLE.NS trades at ₹38.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PLAZACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAZACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹902.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs STARDELTA.BO Comparison February 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, STARDELTA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while STARDELTA.BO trades at ₹471.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas STARDELTA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STARDELTA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to STARDELTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check STARDELTA.BO's competition here