Telecom Italia S.p.A.
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (TQIR.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TQIR.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQIR.DE | €0.28 | -6.14% | 5.4B | -4.72 | -€0.06 | N/A |
| TM5.DE | €187.44 | -1.09% | 209.6B | 22.37 | €8.38 | +1.74% |
| BAC.DE | €43.53 | -0.80% | 183.6B | 12.44 | €3.50 | +5.41% |
| CTM.F | €8.56 | +0.00% | 177.3B | 10.19 | €0.84 | +6.78% |
| SOBA.DE | €23.92 | -0.29% | 167.5B | 9.13 | €2.62 | +4.00% |
| DTE.DE | €32.82 | +0.98% | 158.8B | 16.66 | €1.97 | +2.74% |
| SFT.F | €20.92 | +0.94% | 119.8B | 7.20 | €2.92 | +0.28% |
| CTP2.DE | €26.61 | -0.52% | 96.2B | 5.73 | €4.64 | +3.93% |
| FTE.DE | €17.11 | -0.09% | 45.5B | 85.57 | €0.20 | +4.38% |
| AISF.F | €9.75 | +0.00% | 29B | 22.16 | €0.44 | +9.50% |
Stock Comparison
TQIR.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TM5.DE trades at €187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while BAC.DE trades at €43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs CTM.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while CTM.F trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and CTM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTM.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SOBA.DE trades at €23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 158.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while DTE.DE trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SFT.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SFT.F trades at €20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check SFT.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while CTP2.DE trades at €26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FTE.DE trades at €17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 85.57. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs AISF.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while AISF.F trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and AISF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AISF.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while VODI.DE trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check O2D.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SWTF.F trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and SWTF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWTF.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TA1.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TA1.F has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TA1.F trades at €9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TA1.F's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TA1.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TA1.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TQI.DE trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while UTDI.DE trades at €27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TAFG.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and TAFG.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAFG.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while 1U1.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FNTN.HM trades at €27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FNTN.DE trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs JASN.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while JASN.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and JASN.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JASN.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while 4HW.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check 4HW.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while E4C.DE trades at €9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while LSX.DE trades at €3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and LSX.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LSX.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TGT.DE trades at €0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TGT.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs C1V.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check C1V.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TH51.MU trades at €2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and TH51.MU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TH51.MU's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison March 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here