Telecom Italia S.p.A.
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (TQIR.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TQIR.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQIR.DE | €0.28 | -6.14% | 5.4B | -4.72 | -€0.06 | N/A |
| TM5.DE | €173.82 | -4.48% | 194B | 20.53 | €8.45 | +1.88% |
| BAC.DE | €43.02 | -0.67% | 179.2B | 12.07 | €3.52 | +5.55% |
| CTM.F | €8.56 | +0.00% | 177.3B | 10.19 | €0.84 | +6.78% |
| SOBA.DE | €24.46 | -1.53% | 170.9B | 9.21 | €2.65 | +3.92% |
| DTE.DE | €30.18 | -5.54% | 154B | 16.16 | €1.97 | +2.83% |
| SFT.F | €19.54 | -5.55% | 119B | 7.15 | €2.92 | +0.26% |
| CTP2.DE | €24.17 | -2.32% | 87.1B | 5.13 | €4.69 | +4.21% |
| FTE.DE | €17.62 | -0.17% | 46.8B | 88.10 | €0.20 | +4.26% |
| VODI.DE | €1.32 | +1.38% | 30.2B | -8.16 | -€0.16 | +3.44% |
Stock Comparison
TQIR.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TM5.DE trades at €173.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while BAC.DE trades at €43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs CTM.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while CTM.F trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and CTM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTM.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 170.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SOBA.DE trades at €24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 154B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while DTE.DE trades at €30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SFT.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SFT.F trades at €19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check SFT.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while CTP2.DE trades at €24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FTE.DE trades at €17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 88.10. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while VODI.DE trades at €1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs AISF.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while AISF.F trades at €9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to AISF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check AISF.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check O2D.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while SWTF.F trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and SWTF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWTF.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TA1.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TA1.F has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TA1.F trades at €9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TA1.F's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TA1.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TA1.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TQI.DE trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while UTDI.DE trades at €27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TAFG.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and TAFG.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAFG.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while 1U1.DE trades at €23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 33.59. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FNTN.DE trades at €26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while FNTN.HM trades at €26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
TQIR.DE vs JASN.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while JASN.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and JASN.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JASN.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while 4HW.F trades at €1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check 4HW.F's competition here
TQIR.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while E4C.DE trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while LSX.DE trades at €3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check LSX.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TGT.DE trades at €0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TGT.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs C1V.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check C1V.DE's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TH51.MU trades at €1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE and TH51.MU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TH51.MU's competition here
TQIR.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison April 2026
TQIR.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TQIR.DE stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TQIR.DE is priced at €0.28, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TQIR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.72, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TQIR.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TQIR.DE is less volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TQIR.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here