freenet AG (FNTN.HM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNTN.HM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNTN.HM | €23.22 | +1.31% | 2.7B | 10.48 | €2.22 | +8.91% |
| TM5.DE | €154.82 | +1.43% | 167.5B | 18.61 | €8.32 | +2.18% |
| BAC.DE | €37.37 | +0.51% | 156.1B | 9.13 | €4.10 | +6.35% |
| SOBA.DE | €18.08 | +2.39% | 125.6B | 8.98 | €2.01 | +5.27% |
| DTE.DE | €25.14 | +0.16% | 121.6B | 12.28 | €2.05 | +3.98% |
| CTP2.DE | €20.23 | -4.89% | 72.3B | 4.22 | €4.79 | +5.62% |
| FTE.DE | €15.85 | -0.56% | 42.1B | 112.97 | €0.14 | +4.73% |
| VODI.DE | €1.15 | -0.26% | 26.5B | -4.47 | -€0.26 | +4.01% |
| BTQ.DE | €2.09 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 13.93 | €0.15 | +4.52% |
| TNE5.DE | €3.66 | +3.51% | 20.6B | 24.38 | €0.15 | +7.43% |
Stock Comparison
FNTN.HM vs TM5.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TM5.DE trades at €154.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check TM5.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs BAC.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 156.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while BAC.DE trades at €37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check BAC.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs SOBA.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while SOBA.DE trades at €18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs DTE.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while DTE.DE trades at €25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check DTE.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs CTP2.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while CTP2.DE trades at €20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs FTE.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while FTE.DE trades at €15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 112.97. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check FTE.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs VODI.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while VODI.DE trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check VODI.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs BTQ.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TNE5.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs O2D.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check O2D.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TA1.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check TA1.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TQIR.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM and TQIR.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TQIR.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs UTDI.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while UTDI.DE trades at €23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs 1U1.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while 1U1.DE trades at €20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs FNTN.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while FNTN.DE trades at €23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TQI.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TQI.DE trades at €0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check TQI.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs E4C.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while E4C.DE trades at €6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check E4C.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs LSX.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while LSX.DE trades at €4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 67.10. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check LSX.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs C1V.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check C1V.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TC1.DE Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check TC1.DE's competition here
FNTN.HM vs TH51.MU Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while TH51.MU trades at €1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM and TH51.MU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TH51.MU's competition here
FNTN.HM vs O2D.SG Comparison July 2026
FNTN.HM plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNTN.HM stands at 2.7B. In comparison, O2D.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNTN.HM is priced at €23.22, while O2D.SG trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNTN.HM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas O2D.SG's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, FNTN.HM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to O2D.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNTN.HM is less volatile compared to O2D.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNTN.HM.Check O2D.SG's competition here