mVISE AG (C1V.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (C1V.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1V.DE | €0.49 | -10.91% | 1M | -4.08 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| TM5.DE | €154.82 | +1.43% | 167.5B | 18.61 | €8.32 | +2.18% |
| BAC.DE | €37.37 | +0.51% | 156.1B | 9.13 | €4.10 | +6.35% |
| SOBA.DE | €18.08 | +2.39% | 125.6B | 8.98 | €2.01 | +5.27% |
| DTE.DE | €25.14 | +0.16% | 121.6B | 12.28 | €2.05 | +3.98% |
| CTP2.DE | €20.23 | -4.89% | 72.3B | 4.22 | €4.79 | +5.62% |
| FTE.DE | €15.85 | -0.56% | 42.1B | 112.97 | €0.14 | +4.73% |
| VODI.DE | €1.15 | -0.26% | 26.5B | -4.47 | -€0.26 | +4.01% |
| BTQ.DE | €2.09 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 13.93 | €0.15 | +4.52% |
| TNE5.DE | €3.66 | +3.51% | 20.6B | 24.38 | €0.15 | +7.43% |
Stock Comparison
C1V.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TM5.DE trades at €154.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 156.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while BAC.DE trades at €37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while SOBA.DE trades at €18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while DTE.DE trades at €25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while CTP2.DE trades at €20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FTE.DE trades at €15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 112.97. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while VODI.DE trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check O2D.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TQIR.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TQIR.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while UTDI.DE trades at €23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while 1U1.DE trades at €20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FNTN.DE trades at €23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FNTN.HM trades at €23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
C1V.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TQI.DE trades at €0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while E4C.DE trades at €6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while LSX.DE trades at €4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 67.10. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check LSX.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs O2D.SG Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, O2D.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while O2D.SG trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas O2D.SG's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to O2D.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to O2D.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check O2D.SG's competition here
C1V.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison July 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TH51.MU trades at €1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TH51.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TH51.MU's competition here