Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TH51.MU's competitors and their performance on the MUN and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TH51.MU and its MUN peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH51.MU | €0.92 | -1.08% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAC.DE | €41.26 | -2.20% | 172.1B | 10.06 | €4.10 | +5.68% |
| TM5.DE | €159.40 | -1.52% | 171B | 19.16 | €8.32 | +2.10% |
| SOBA.DE | €21.52 | -1.06% | 147.5B | 10.69 | €2.01 | +4.43% |
| DTE.DE | €27.50 | -0.33% | 133B | 13.44 | €2.05 | +3.64% |
| CTP2.DE | €21.58 | +1.96% | 76.6B | 4.50 | €4.79 | +5.27% |
| FTE.DE | €17.35 | +5.66% | 46.1B | 35.24 | €0.49 | +4.32% |
| VODI.DE | €1.42 | -1.11% | 32.8B | -71.87 | -€0.02 | +3.24% |
| BTQ.DE | €2.09 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 13.93 | €0.15 | +4.52% |
| TNE5.DE | €3.66 | -3.05% | 20.6B | 24.41 | €0.15 | +7.42% |
Stock Comparison
Verizon Communications Inc. (XETRA: BAC.DE)
TH51.MU vs BAC.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 172.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while BAC.DE trades at €41.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check BAC.DE's competition here
T-Mobile US, Inc. (XETRA: TM5.DE)
TH51.MU vs TM5.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TM5.DE trades at €159.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TM5.DE's competition here
AT&T Inc. (XETRA: SOBA.DE)
TH51.MU vs SOBA.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while SOBA.DE trades at €21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
Deutsche Telekom AG (XETRA: DTE.DE)
TH51.MU vs DTE.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while DTE.DE trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check DTE.DE's competition here
Comcast Corporation (XETRA: CTP2.DE)
TH51.MU vs CTP2.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while CTP2.DE trades at €21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
Orange S.A. (XETRA: FTE.DE)
TH51.MU vs FTE.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while FTE.DE trades at €17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check FTE.DE's competition here
Vodafone Group Plc (XETRA: VODI.DE)
TH51.MU vs VODI.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while VODI.DE trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -71.87. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check VODI.DE's competition here
BT Group plc (XETRA: BTQ.DE)
TH51.MU vs BTQ.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
Telefonica S.A. (XETRA: TNE5.DE)
TH51.MU vs TNE5.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG (XETRA: O2D.DE)
TH51.MU vs O2D.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check O2D.DE's competition here
Telekom Austria AG (XETRA: TA1.DE)
TH51.MU vs TA1.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TA1.DE's competition here
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (XETRA: TQIR.DE)
TH51.MU vs TQIR.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is similarly volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TQIR.DE's competition here
United Internet AG (XETRA: UTDI.DE)
TH51.MU vs UTDI.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while UTDI.DE trades at €24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
1&1 AG (XETRA: 1U1.DE)
TH51.MU vs 1U1.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while 1U1.DE trades at €20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
freenet AG (XETRA: FNTN.DE)
TH51.MU vs FNTN.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while FNTN.DE trades at €25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
freenet AG (HAM: FNTN.HM)
TH51.MU vs FNTN.HM Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while FNTN.HM trades at €25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (XETRA: TQI.DE)
TH51.MU vs TQI.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TQI.DE trades at €0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TQI.DE's competition here
Ecotel Communication Ag (XETRA: E4C.DE)
TH51.MU vs E4C.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while E4C.DE trades at €7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is similarly volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check E4C.DE's competition here
mVISE AG (XETRA: C1V.DE)
TH51.MU vs C1V.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check C1V.DE's competition here
Telefonica Deutschland Holding AG (STU: O2D.SG)
TH51.MU vs O2D.SG Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, O2D.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while O2D.SG trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O2D.SG's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to O2D.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to O2D.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check O2D.SG's competition here
Tele Columbus AG (XETRA: TC1.DE)
TH51.MU vs TC1.DE Comparison July 2026
Teleservice AG (MUN: TH51.MU) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TH51.MU stands at 0. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TH51.MU is priced at €0.92 on the MUN, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TH51.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TH51.MU's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TH51.MU is less volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TH51.MU.Check TC1.DE's competition here