Toll Brothers, Inc.

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while DHI trades at $145.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check DHI's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LEN has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while LEN trades at $115.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LEN's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to LEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check LEN's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while LEN-B trades at $110.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check LEN-B's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while PHM trades at $116.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check PHM's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while NVR trades at $7,792.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check NVR's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while TMHC trades at $60.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check TMHC's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while MTH trades at $69.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check MTH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while MDC trades at $62.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check MDC's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while KBH trades at $56.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check KBH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while SKY trades at $65.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check SKY's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while CVCO trades at $417.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check CVCO's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while MHO trades at $122.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check MHO's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while GRBK trades at $66.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check GRBK's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while TPH trades at $31.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check TPH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while DFH trades at $27.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check DFH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CCS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while CCS trades at $59.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CCS's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to CCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check CCS's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while LGIH trades at $57.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check LGIH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while GRBK-PA trades at $24.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check GRBK-PA's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while BZH trades at $24.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BZH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to BZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check BZH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while HOVNP trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check HOVNP's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while HOV trades at $120.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check HOV's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 548.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while LEGH trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check LEGH's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while SIC trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check SIC's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while UHG trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UHG's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check UHG's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while SPHL trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check SPHL's competition here

TOL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TOL stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOL is priced at $123.04, while NWHM trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TOL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOL is more volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOL.Check NWHM's competition here