Lennar Corporation

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while DHI trades at $159.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check DHI's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while PHM trades at $127.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check PHM's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while LEN-B trades at $91.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LEN-B's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while NVR trades at $6,503.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check NVR's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while TOL trades at $146.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to TOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TOL's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while IBP trades at $302.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check IBP's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while TMHC trades at $63.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TMHC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while MDC trades at $62.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MDC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while MTH trades at $69.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MTH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while SKY trades at $82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SKY's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while CVCO trades at $539.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check CVCO's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while TPH trades at $46.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TPH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while KBH trades at $55.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check KBH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while MHO trades at $133.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MHO's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while GRBK trades at $70.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check GRBK's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while HOVNP trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check HOVNP's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, CCS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while CCS trades at $59.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas CCS's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to CCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check CCS's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while DFH trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check DFH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while LGIH trades at $45.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LGIH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while GRBK-PA trades at $23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check GRBK-PA's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 662.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while BZH trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is 77.41. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to BZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check BZH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 604.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while HOV trades at $117.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check HOV's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while LEGH trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LEGH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while SIC trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SIC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while UHG trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UHG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check UHG's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while SPHL trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SPHL's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 23.8B. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $94.05, while NWHM trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check NWHM's competition here