Lennar Corporation

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while DHI trades at $135.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check DHI's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while PHM trades at $110.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check PHM's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while LEN-B trades at $80.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LEN-B's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while NVR trades at $5,563.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check NVR's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while TOL trades at $126.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to TOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TOL's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while IBP trades at $209.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check IBP's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while TMHC trades at $54.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TMHC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while MDC trades at $62.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MDC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while TPH trades at $46.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check TPH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while MTH trades at $59.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MTH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while SKY trades at $66.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SKY's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while CVCO trades at $455.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check CVCO's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while MHO trades at $121.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check MHO's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while HOVNP trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check HOVNP's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while KBH trades at $45.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check KBH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while GRBK trades at $62.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check GRBK's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, CCS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while CCS trades at $48.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas CCS's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to CCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check CCS's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while DFH trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check DFH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while GRBK-PA trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check GRBK-PA's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 938.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while LGIH trades at $40.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LGIH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 605.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while BZH trades at $22.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is -123.00. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to BZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check BZH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while LEGH trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check LEGH's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 496M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while HOV trades at $96.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check HOV's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while SIC trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SIC's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while UHG trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UHG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check UHG's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while SPHL trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check SPHL's competition here

LEN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEN stands at 20.8B. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEN is priced at $82.30, while NWHM trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.84, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEN is more volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEN.Check NWHM's competition here