Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while DHI trades at $151.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to DHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check DHI's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while PHM trades at $133.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to PHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check PHM's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while LEN-B trades at $86.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check LEN-B's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, LEN has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while LEN trades at $87.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas LEN's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LEN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to LEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check LEN's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while NVR trades at $6,365.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to NVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check NVR's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while TOL trades at $154.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to TOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check TOL's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while TMHC trades at $72.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check TMHC's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while IBP trades at $241.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check IBP's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while SKY trades at $91.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to SKY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check SKY's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while MTH trades at $74.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to MTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check MTH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while MDC trades at $62.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check MDC's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while CVCO trades at $587.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check CVCO's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while TPH trades at $46.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check TPH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while MHO trades at $150.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to MHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check MHO's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while KBH trades at $58.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to KBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check KBH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while GRBK trades at $73.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check GRBK's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while GRBK-PA trades at $22.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check GRBK-PA's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while HOVNP trades at $19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check HOVNP's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, CCS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while CCS trades at $71.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CCS's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to CCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check CCS's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, BXBL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while BXBL trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BXBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BXBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to BXBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check BXBL's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while LGIH trades at $61.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check LGIH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while DFH trades at $14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check DFH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 931.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while BZH trades at $34.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is 85.24. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to BZH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check BZH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while HOV trades at $137.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check HOV's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 654.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while LEGH trades at $27.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check LEGH's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, SDHC has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while SDHC trades at $15.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SDHC's P/E ratio is -57.54. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SDHC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to SDHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check SDHC's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while UHG trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UHG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to UHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check UHG's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while SPHL trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check SPHL's competition here

Select Interior Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIC) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIC stands at 376M. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SIC is priced at $14.49 on the NASDAQ, while NWHM trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIC currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIC's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIC is less volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIC.Check NWHM's competition here