Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCS | $58.11 | +4.95% | 1.7B | 13.10 | $4.44 | +2.11% |
| DHI | $151.07 | +4.71% | 42.8B | 14.19 | $10.65 | +1.16% |
| LEN | $92.56 | +2.01% | 23.4B | 13.32 | $6.95 | +2.16% |
| PHM | $122.78 | +4.31% | 23.4B | 11.88 | $10.34 | +0.78% |
| LEN-B | $90.88 | +2.08% | 23B | 13.07 | $6.95 | +2.16% |
| NVR | $6,406.57 | +3.48% | 17.3B | 15.70 | $409.28 | N/A |
| TOL | $144.14 | +5.09% | 13.5B | 10.96 | $13.15 | +0.70% |
| TMHC | $71.64 | +0.28% | 6.7B | 10.68 | $6.71 | N/A |
| IBP | $206.03 | +2.90% | 5.6B | 22.03 | $9.35 | +1.61% |
| MTH | $72.09 | +5.64% | 4.8B | 13.16 | $5.48 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
CCS vs DHI Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while DHI trades at $151.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check DHI's competition here
CCS vs LEN Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LEN has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while LEN trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LEN's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to LEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEN's competition here
CCS vs PHM Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while PHM trades at $122.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check PHM's competition here
CCS vs LEN-B Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while LEN-B trades at $90.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEN-B's competition here
CCS vs NVR Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while NVR trades at $6,406.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check NVR's competition here
CCS vs TOL Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while TOL trades at $144.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to TOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TOL's competition here
CCS vs TMHC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while TMHC trades at $71.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TMHC's competition here
CCS vs IBP Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while IBP trades at $206.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check IBP's competition here
CCS vs MTH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while MTH trades at $72.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MTH's competition here
CCS vs MDC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while MDC trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MDC's competition here
CCS vs CVCO Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while CVCO trades at $578.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check CVCO's competition here
CCS vs SKY Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while SKY trades at $77.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SKY's competition here
CCS vs TPH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while TPH trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TPH's competition here
CCS vs MHO Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while MHO trades at $140.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MHO's competition here
CCS vs KBH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while KBH trades at $53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check KBH's competition here
CCS vs GRBK Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while GRBK trades at $71.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check GRBK's competition here
CCS vs HOVNP Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while HOVNP trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check HOVNP's competition here
CCS vs GRBK-PA Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while GRBK-PA trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check GRBK-PA's competition here
CCS vs DFH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while DFH trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check DFH's competition here
CCS vs LGIH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while LGIH trades at $53.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LGIH's competition here
CCS vs BZH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 739.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while BZH trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is -150.22. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to BZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check BZH's competition here
CCS vs LEGH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 590.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while LEGH trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEGH's competition here
CCS vs HOV Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 577M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while HOV trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check HOV's competition here
CCS vs SIC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while SIC trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SIC's competition here
CCS vs UHG Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while UHG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UHG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check UHG's competition here
CCS vs SPHL Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while SPHL trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SPHL's competition here
CCS vs NWHM Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $58.11, while NWHM trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check NWHM's competition here