Treasury Metals Inc.
Treasury Metals Inc. TML.TO Peers
See (TML.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TML.TO | $0.22 | +4.76% | 64.73M | -3.14 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $72.95 | +0.25% | 81.19B | 11.88 | $6.14 | +1.91% |
| AEM.TO | $160.31 | +2.27% | 81.04B | 24.36 | $6.58 | +1.00% |
| WPM.TO | $118.24 | +2.43% | 53.64B | 62.23 | $1.90 | +0.74% |
| ABX.TO | $26.11 | +0.40% | 44.89B | 14.19 | $1.84 | +2.12% |
| FNV.TO | $229.66 | +0.35% | 44.23B | 51.04 | $4.50 | +0.89% |
| K.TO | $20.31 | +1.55% | 24.99B | 14.82 | $1.37 | +0.82% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $36.23 | +1.91% | 15.24B | 41.64 | $0.87 | +0.28% |
| LUG.TO | $62.72 | +4.13% | 15.08B | 20.23 | $3.10 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
TML.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 81.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NGT.TO trades at $72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 81.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AEM.TO trades at $160.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 53.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while WPM.TO trades at $118.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 62.23. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 44.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ABX.TO trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while FNV.TO trades at $229.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs K.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 24.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while K.TO trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AGI.TO trades at $36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while LUG.TO trades at $62.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while EDV.TO trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -69.51. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while OR.TO trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 144.33. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while BTO.TO trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ELD.TO trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while IMG.TO trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NGD.TO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while OLA.TO trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while PRU.TO trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while EQX.TO trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while OGC.TO trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while TXG.TO trades at $44.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SSL.TO trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 86.57. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while DPM.TO trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while KNT.TO trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SSRM.TO trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while WDO.TO trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CXB.TO trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while WGX.TO trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ORA.TO trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CG.TO trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.20. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NG.TO trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -24.85. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SEA.TO trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -113.73. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CNL.TO trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while RUP.TO trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -167.33. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 774.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 728.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while MSA.TO trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 591.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ASE.CN trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 573.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ORE.TO trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 486.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GAU.TO trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 462.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while PRB.TO trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 458.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while MND.TO trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 414.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while FDR.V trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -35.69. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 302.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while IAU.TO trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 260.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while JAG.TO trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 233.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SBI.TO trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 225.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while STGO.TO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 220.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ITH.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 209.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 197.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while DNG.TO trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 175.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while FF.TO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 170.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 138.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while LGD.TO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 128.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SANU.CN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 125.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while LN.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 110.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GHRT.V trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 106.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CBR.V trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 103.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NEXG.V trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 96.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while XTG.TO trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 95.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 94.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ELO.TO trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 89.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while STLR.TO trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs G.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 86.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while G.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 79.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SIG.CN trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 69.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CCM.TO trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 68.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 62.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CGC.V trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 60.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while HMR.V trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 51.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while VEIN.V trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 42.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while ESM.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while USGD.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 37.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NVO.TO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AMM.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 27.07M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 21.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while VAU.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and VAU.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO and YRB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TML.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 18.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while PME.TO trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while HWG.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.
TML.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
TML.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TML.TO stands at 64.73M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 15.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TML.TO is priced at $0.22, while NOM.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TML.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, TML.TO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TML.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TML.TO.