Talon Metals Corp.

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BHPLF trades at $35.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BHPLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while RTNTF trades at $116.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check RTNTF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while RTPPF trades at $96.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check RTPPF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while GMBXF trades at $12.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check GMBXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while GLNCY trades at $13.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -42.84. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check GLNCY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while GLCNF trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check GLCNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while CMCLF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check CMCLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NGLOY trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NGLOY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AAUKF trades at $50.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AAUKF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FSUMF trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FSUMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FSUGY trades at $28.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FSUGY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while TCKRF trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check TCKRF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while IPOAF trades at $61.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check IPOAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BDNNY trades at $148.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BDNNY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while SMMYY trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check SMMYY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while IVPAF trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 52.59. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check IVPAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while STMNF trades at $57.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 100.44. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check STMNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while SHTLF trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check SHTLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while SOUHY trades at $15.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check SOUHY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while LYSCF trades at $11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 1119.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check LYSCF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while LYSDY trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 1105.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check LYSDY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PILBF trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PILBF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BOLIF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MALRY trades at $38.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MALRY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MALRY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PUTKY trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PUTKY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ABML's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MALRF trades at $33.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MALRF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MALRF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PUTKF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NGXXF trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -54.85. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NGXXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NILSY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MIMTF trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MIMTF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PTNDY trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PTNDY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while IPGDF trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check IPGDF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while IIDDY trades at $10.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check IIDDY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PAEKY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PTNDF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PTNDF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while LINRF trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check LINRF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NICMF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NICMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FLMMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while DWMNF trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check DWMNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FMCXF trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -121.75. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FMCXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AFBOF trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 123.50. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AFBOF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AZZVF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AUSDF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AUSDF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ERMAY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ERMAY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while DETRF trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check DETRF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ILKAY trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ILKAY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ILKAF trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ILKAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PTTMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ERMAF trades at $54.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ERMAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ATUSF trades at $32.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ATUSF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ADMLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ADTLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AMVMF trades at $41.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AMVMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AFMJF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AFMJF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while TAOFF trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check TAOFF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MCHHF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MCHHF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check SLGGF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AZRMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MFRVF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PXMFF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PXMFF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MJDLF trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MJDLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check STTSY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while TTNNF trades at $12.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check TTNNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while SYAXF trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check SYAXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 884.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MNXMF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MNXMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ALMTF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NCKAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NCKAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MLXEF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MLXEF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BIRNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while VULNF trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check VULNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while CHXMF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check CHXMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while CGMLF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check CGMLF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while GDQMF trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check GDQMF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PMETF trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PMETF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BENZF trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BENZF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while OSTTF trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check OSTTF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FGOVF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -106.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FGOVF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NTCPF trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NTCPF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while UURAF trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check UURAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MRRDF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MRRDF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MGMNF trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 217.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MGMNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 535.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while FWEDF trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check FWEDF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while OMZNF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check OMZNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while BQSSF trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check BQSSF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ARAAF trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ARAAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ECRAF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ECRAF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check MCRZF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while RGLSF trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check RGLSF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check PRMNF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ERLFF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ERLFF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while JMXXF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check JMXXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while CTJHY trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check CTJHY's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while RTRFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check RTRFF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while AUMTF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check AUMTF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 387.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ARAFF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ARAFF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while ERDCF trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check ERDCF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while CXOXF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check CXOXF's competition here

TLOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLOFF stands at 452.6M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLOFF is priced at $4.82, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLOFF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TLOFF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TLOFF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLOFF.Check NQMIY's competition here