Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, VST has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while VST trades at $160.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas VST's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to VST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check VST's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NRG has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while NRG trades at $137.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas NRG's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to NRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check NRG's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check AESC's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while AES trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check AES's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, TAC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while TAC trades at $13.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas TAC's P/E ratio is 113.58. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to TAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check TAC's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, KEN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while KEN trades at $67.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas KEN's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to KEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check KEN's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, XIFR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while XIFR trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas XIFR's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XIFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to XIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check XIFR's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, SKYS has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while SKYS trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas SKYS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is less volatile compared to SKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check SKYS's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while SUUN trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check SUUN's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, JE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while JE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas JE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JE's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is less volatile compared to JE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check JE's competition here

TLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLN stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TLN is priced at $400.12, while HNP trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLN currently has a P/E ratio of -79.55, whereas HNP's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, TLN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HNP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLN is more volatile compared to HNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLN.Check HNP's competition here