Kenon Holdings Ltd.

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VST has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while VST trades at $149.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas VST's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to VST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check VST's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NRG has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while NRG trades at $136.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas NRG's P/E ratio is 148.84. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to NRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check NRG's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TLN has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while TLN trades at $360.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas TLN's P/E ratio is -693.42. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to TLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check TLN's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check AESC's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while AES trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check AES's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while PAM trades at $81.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to PAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check PAM's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TAC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while TAC trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas TAC's P/E ratio is -24.51. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to TAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check TAC's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, XIFR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while XIFR trades at $11.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas XIFR's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XIFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to XIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check XIFR's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SKYS has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while SKYS trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas SKYS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKYS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to SKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check SKYS's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while JE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas JE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JE's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is less volatile compared to JE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check JE's competition here

KEN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEN is priced at $85.79, while HNP trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEN currently has a P/E ratio of 67.67, whereas HNP's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, KEN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEN is more volatile compared to HNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEN.Check HNP's competition here