Sky Solar Holdings, Ltd. (SKYS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, VST has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while VST trades at $160.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas VST's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to VST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to VST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check VST's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, NRG has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while NRG trades at $137.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NRG's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to NRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check NRG's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, TLN has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while TLN trades at $400.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TLN's P/E ratio is -79.55. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to TLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check TLN's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check AESC's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while AES trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check AES's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, TAC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while TAC trades at $13.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TAC's P/E ratio is 113.58. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TAC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to TAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check TAC's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, KEN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while KEN trades at $67.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas KEN's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KEN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to KEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check KEN's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, XIFR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while XIFR trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas XIFR's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to XIFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to XIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check XIFR's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while SUUN trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check SUUN's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, HNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while HNP trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HNP's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HNP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to HNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check HNP's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, JE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while JE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to JE's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to JE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check JE's competition here