Sky Solar Holdings, Ltd.

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, VST has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while VST trades at $144.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas VST's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to VST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to VST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check VST's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, NRG has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while NRG trades at $133.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NRG's P/E ratio is 145.62. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to NRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check NRG's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, TLN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while TLN trades at $344.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TLN's P/E ratio is -662.42. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to TLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check TLN's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check AESC's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while AES trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check AES's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, KEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while KEN trades at $85.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas KEN's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to KEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check KEN's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while PAM trades at $79.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to PAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check PAM's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, TAC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while TAC trades at $12.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TAC's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TAC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to TAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check TAC's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, XIFR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while XIFR trades at $11.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas XIFR's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to XIFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to XIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check XIFR's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, JE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while JE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to JE's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to JE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check JE's competition here

SKYS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYS stands at 150.4M. In comparison, HNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYS is priced at $7.17, while HNP trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HNP's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, SKYS's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HNP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYS is more volatile compared to HNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYS.Check HNP's competition here