Tokyo Gas Co.,Ltd.
Tokyo Gas Co.,Ltd. TKGSY Peers
See (TKGSY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TKGSY | $16.77 | +1.05% | 12.39B | 25.03 | $0.67 | N/A |
GASNY | $5.51 | -3.08% | 26.47B | 12.24 | $0.45 | +4.84% |
GASNF | $27.15 | N/A | 26.08B | 12.01 | $2.26 | +5.36% |
SNMRF | $5.40 | N/A | 18.11B | 12.86 | $0.42 | +5.59% |
HOKCF | $0.91 | N/A | 16.98B | 22.75 | $0.04 | +4.93% |
HOKCY | $0.89 | -1.11% | 16.61B | 22.25 | $0.04 | +4.94% |
GAILF | $10.80 | N/A | 14.14B | 8.06 | $1.34 | +4.17% |
TKGSF | $31.55 | N/A | 11.66B | 23.54 | $1.34 | +1.72% |
OSGSF | $24.57 | N/A | 9.75B | 14.71 | $1.67 | +1.36% |
XNGSF | $8.39 | N/A | 9.32B | 11.34 | $0.74 | +4.52% |
Stock Comparison
TKGSY vs GASNY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 26.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while GASNY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs GASNF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 26.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while GASNF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to GASNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs SNMRF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 18.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while SNMRF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to SNMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs HOKCF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 16.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while HOKCF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to HOKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs HOKCY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 16.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while HOKCY trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs GAILF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 14.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while GAILF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to GAILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs TKGSF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, TKGSF has a market cap of 11.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while TKGSF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas TKGSF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKGSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to TKGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs OSGSF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while OSGSF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to OSGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs XNGSF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while XNGSF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to XNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs SNMRY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while SNMRY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs XNGSY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while XNGSY trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ATGFF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 7.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ATGFF trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to ATGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs PNAGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 7.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while PNAGF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to PNAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CGASY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CGASY trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CGASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ENGGY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 7.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ENGGY trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs APAJF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, APAJF has a market cap of 6.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while APAJF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas APAJF's P/E ratio is -132.77. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APAJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to APAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ITGGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ITGGF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs OSGSY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while OSGSY trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CRGGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CRGGF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CRGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ENGH Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CGHOF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CGHOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CGHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CGHLY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CGHLY trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CGHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs AGEEF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to AGEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ENGGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ENGGF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to ENGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs PPAAF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, PPAAF has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while PPAAF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas PPAAF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to PPAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs THOGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs SRCU Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to SRCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs TGASF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, TGASF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while TGASF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas TGASF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to TGASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs SUUIF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while SUUIF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is -33.93. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs ASCOF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 725.07M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while ASCOF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs NPPGF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to NPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs BJGBF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 227.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while BJGBF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to BJGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs PPAAY Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, PPAAY has a market cap of 47.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while PPAAY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas PPAAY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to PPAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs EVGIF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 6.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while EVGIF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to EVGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CGFEF Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 5.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CGFEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs PTTN Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3422.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is more volatile compared to PTTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.
TKGSY vs CHNGQ Comparison
TKGSY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSY stands at 12.39B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2146.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSY is priced at $16.77, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.03, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSY is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSY.