APA Group
APA Group (APAJF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APAJF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAJF | $7.53 | +1.76% | 10B | 83.61 | $0.09 | +5.06% |
| GASNY | $6.28 | +0.16% | 29.3B | 12.08 | $0.52 | +6.50% |
| GASNF | $29.37 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 11.30 | $2.60 | +6.93% |
| SNMRF | $8.12 | +0.00% | 27.2B | 17.27 | $0.47 | +4.24% |
| SNMRY | $15.19 | +0.33% | 25.5B | 17.65 | $0.86 | +4.53% |
| HOKCY | $0.92 | +3.74% | 17.2B | 23.10 | $0.04 | +4.83% |
| HOKCF | $0.87 | -2.24% | 16.2B | 21.65 | $0.04 | +5.16% |
| TKGSY | $21.00 | -1.32% | 14.6B | 10.05 | $2.09 | +2.43% |
| TKGSF | $42.31 | +5.09% | 14.4B | 10.12 | $4.18 | +1.78% |
| OSGSY | $70.26 | -7.19% | 13.5B | 14.05 | $5.00 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
APAJF vs GASNY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while GASNY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check GASNY's competition here
APAJF vs GASNF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while GASNF trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and GASNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASNF's competition here
APAJF vs SNMRF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while SNMRF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and SNMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNMRF's competition here
APAJF vs SNMRY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while SNMRY trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check SNMRY's competition here
APAJF vs HOKCY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while HOKCY trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check HOKCY's competition here
APAJF vs HOKCF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while HOKCF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and HOKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOKCF's competition here
APAJF vs TKGSY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, TKGSY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while TKGSY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas TKGSY's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKGSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and TKGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKGSY's competition here
APAJF vs TKGSF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, TKGSF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while TKGSF trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas TKGSF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and TKGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKGSF's competition here
APAJF vs OSGSY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while OSGSY trades at $70.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check OSGSY's competition here
APAJF vs OSGSF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while OSGSF trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and OSGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSGSF's competition here
APAJF vs ITGGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ITGGF trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check ITGGF's competition here
APAJF vs GAILF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while GAILF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and GAILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAILF's competition here
APAJF vs ATGFF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ATGFF trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and ATGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGFF's competition here
APAJF vs ENGGY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ENGGY trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check ENGGY's competition here
APAJF vs PNAGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while PNAGF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and PNAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNAGF's competition here
APAJF vs THOGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 66.03. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check THOGF's competition here
APAJF vs XNGSY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while XNGSY trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check XNGSY's competition here
APAJF vs XNGSF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while XNGSF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and XNGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XNGSF's competition here
APAJF vs CRGGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CRGGF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and CRGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRGGF's competition here
APAJF vs CGHOF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CGHOF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and CGHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGHOF's competition here
APAJF vs ENGH Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check ENGH's competition here
APAJF vs CGHLY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CGHLY trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to CGHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check CGHLY's competition here
APAJF vs CGASY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CGASY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to CGASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check CGASY's competition here
APAJF vs ENGGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ENGGF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and ENGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGGF's competition here
APAJF vs AGEEF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and AGEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGEEF's competition here
APAJF vs PPAAF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, PPAAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while PPAAF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas PPAAF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and PPAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPAAF's competition here
APAJF vs PPAAY Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, PPAAY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while PPAAY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas PPAAY's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to PPAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check PPAAY's competition here
APAJF vs SRCU Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and SRCU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRCU's competition here
APAJF vs TGASF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, TGASF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while TGASF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas TGASF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and TGASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGASF's competition here
APAJF vs SUUIF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while SUUIF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check SUUIF's competition here
APAJF vs ASCOF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ASCOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check ASCOF's competition here
APAJF vs NPPGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and NPPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPPGF's competition here
APAJF vs BJGBF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while BJGBF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and BJGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJGBF's competition here
APAJF vs CGFEF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CGFEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check CGFEF's competition here
APAJF vs EVGIF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while EVGIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and EVGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVGIF's competition here
APAJF vs PTTN Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and PTTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTN's competition here
APAJF vs CHNGQ Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check CHNGQ's competition here
APAJF vs ALTGF Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, ALTGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while ALTGF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas ALTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF and ALTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTGF's competition here
APAJF vs CTGSP Comparison May 2026
APAJF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APAJF stands at 10B. In comparison, CTGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APAJF is priced at $7.53, while CTGSP trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APAJF currently has a P/E ratio of 83.61, whereas CTGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APAJF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APAJF is less volatile compared to CTGSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APAJF.Check CTGSP's competition here