PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Tbk
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PPAAY
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PPAAY
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Tbk (PPAAY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPAAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPAAY | $5.40 | -1.10% | 2.6B | 12.27 | $0.44 | +7.00% |
| GASNY | $6.26 | -0.16% | 29B | 12.19 | $0.51 | +4.31% |
| GASNF | $29.37 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 11.30 | $2.60 | +6.51% |
| SNMRY | $15.47 | +0.91% | 26B | 18.03 | $0.86 | +4.51% |
| SNMRF | $7.37 | +0.00% | 24.7B | 15.69 | $0.47 | +4.67% |
| HOKCY | $0.99 | +8.79% | 17.6B | 23.60 | $0.04 | +4.73% |
| HOKCF | $0.87 | -2.24% | 16.2B | 21.65 | $0.04 | +5.16% |
| OSGSY | $81.58 | +1.52% | 15.8B | 14.46 | $5.64 | +1.76% |
| TKGSY | $20.10 | -7.16% | 14B | 12.33 | $1.63 | +2.11% |
| TKGSF | $39.75 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 12.05 | $3.30 | +1.73% |
Stock Comparison
PPAAY vs GASNY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while GASNY trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check GASNY's competition here
PPAAY vs GASNF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while GASNF trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and GASNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASNF's competition here
PPAAY vs SNMRY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while SNMRY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check SNMRY's competition here
PPAAY vs SNMRF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while SNMRF trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and SNMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNMRF's competition here
PPAAY vs HOKCY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while HOKCY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check HOKCY's competition here
PPAAY vs HOKCF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while HOKCF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and HOKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOKCF's competition here
PPAAY vs OSGSY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while OSGSY trades at $81.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check OSGSY's competition here
PPAAY vs TKGSY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TKGSY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while TKGSY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas TKGSY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKGSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and TKGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKGSY's competition here
PPAAY vs TKGSF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TKGSF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while TKGSF trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas TKGSF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and TKGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKGSF's competition here
PPAAY vs OSGSF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while OSGSF trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and OSGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSGSF's competition here
PPAAY vs ITGGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ITGGF trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check ITGGF's competition here
PPAAY vs GAILF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while GAILF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and GAILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAILF's competition here
PPAAY vs ATGFF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ATGFF trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to ATGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check ATGFF's competition here
PPAAY vs ENGGY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ENGGY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check ENGGY's competition here
PPAAY vs PNAGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while PNAGF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to PNAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check PNAGF's competition here
PPAAY vs XNGSF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while XNGSF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and XNGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XNGSF's competition here
PPAAY vs THOGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 66.03. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check THOGF's competition here
PPAAY vs APAJF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APAJF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while APAJF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas APAJF's P/E ratio is 77.89. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APAJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and APAJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APAJF's competition here
PPAAY vs XNGSY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while XNGSY trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check XNGSY's competition here
PPAAY vs CGASY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CGASY trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and CGASY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGASY's competition here
PPAAY vs CRGGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CRGGF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and CRGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRGGF's competition here
PPAAY vs CGHLY Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CGHLY trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and CGHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGHLY's competition here
PPAAY vs CGHOF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CGHOF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and CGHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGHOF's competition here
PPAAY vs ENGH Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check ENGH's competition here
PPAAY vs ENGGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ENGGF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and ENGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGGF's competition here
PPAAY vs AGEEF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and AGEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGEEF's competition here
PPAAY vs PPAAF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PPAAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while PPAAF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas PPAAF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and PPAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPAAF's competition here
PPAAY vs SRCU Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and SRCU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRCU's competition here
PPAAY vs TGASF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TGASF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while TGASF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas TGASF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and TGASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGASF's competition here
PPAAY vs SUUIF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while SUUIF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check SUUIF's competition here
PPAAY vs ASCOF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ASCOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check ASCOF's competition here
PPAAY vs NPPGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and NPPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPPGF's competition here
PPAAY vs BJGBF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while BJGBF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and BJGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJGBF's competition here
PPAAY vs CGFEF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CGFEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check CGFEF's competition here
PPAAY vs EVGIF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while EVGIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and EVGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVGIF's competition here
PPAAY vs PTTN Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and PTTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTN's competition here
PPAAY vs CHNGQ Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check CHNGQ's competition here
PPAAY vs CTGSP Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CTGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while CTGSP trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas CTGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY is less volatile compared to CTGSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAY.Check CTGSP's competition here
PPAAY vs ALTGF Comparison April 2026
PPAAY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALTGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAY is priced at $5.40, while ALTGF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.27, whereas ALTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAY and ALTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTGF's competition here