Tokyo Gas Co.,Ltd.
Tokyo Gas Co.,Ltd. TKGSF Peers
See (TKGSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKGSF | $31.55 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 23.72 | $1.33 | +1.72% |
| GASNF | $30.94 | +0.00% | 29.7B | 13.39 | $2.31 | +5.62% |
| GASNY | $6.24 | +0.85% | 28.9B | 13.09 | $0.46 | +5.79% |
| SNMRY | $11.83 | -0.59% | 19.8B | 12.85 | $0.92 | +3.89% |
| SNMRF | $5.40 | +0.00% | 18.1B | 11.74 | $0.46 | +5.74% |
| HOKCF | $0.84 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 21.00 | $0.04 | +2.28% |
| HOKCY | $0.80 | +6.00% | 14.9B | 19.93 | $0.04 | +5.28% |
| GAILF | $10.80 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 8.06 | $1.34 | +4.17% |
| TKGSY | $16.64 | +3.16% | 12.1B | 24.49 | $0.66 | +0.99% |
| OSGSF | $24.57 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 10.78 | $2.28 | +1.36% |
Stock Comparison
TKGSF vs GASNF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while GASNF trades at $30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to GASNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs GASNY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while GASNY trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs SNMRY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while SNMRY trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs SNMRF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while SNMRF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to SNMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs HOKCF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while HOKCF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to HOKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs HOKCY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while HOKCY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs GAILF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while GAILF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to GAILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs TKGSY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TKGSY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while TKGSY trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TKGSY's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKGSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to TKGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs OSGSF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while OSGSF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to OSGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs XNGSF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while XNGSF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to XNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs XNGSY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while XNGSY trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ENGGY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ENGGY trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ATGFF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ATGFF trades at $28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to ATGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs PNAGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while PNAGF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to PNAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ITGGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ITGGF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CGASY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CGASY trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to CGASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs APAJF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, APAJF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while APAJF trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas APAJF's P/E ratio is -133.50. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APAJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to APAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs OSGSY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while OSGSY trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CRGGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CRGGF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to CRGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ENGH Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CGHOF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CGHOF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to CGHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CGHLY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CGHLY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to CGHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ENGGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ENGGF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to ENGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs AGEEF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to AGEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs PPAAF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PPAAF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while PPAAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PPAAF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to PPAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs THOGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs SRCU Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to SRCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs TGASF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TGASF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while TGASF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TGASF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to TGASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs SUUIF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while SUUIF trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is 64.77. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ASCOF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ASCOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs NPPGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to NPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs BJGBF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while BJGBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to BJGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs PPAAY Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PPAAY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while PPAAY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PPAAY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to PPAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs EVGIF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while EVGIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to EVGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CGFEF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 79.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CGFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs PTTN Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to PTTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CHNGQ Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs ALTGF Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ALTGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while ALTGF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ALTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to ALTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.
TKGSF vs CTGSP Comparison
TKGSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKGSF stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CTGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKGSF is priced at $31.55, while CTGSP trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CTGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKGSF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKGSF is more volatile compared to CTGSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKGSF.