Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited
Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited (TGASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TGASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGASF | $0.45 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 8.96 | $0.05 | +42.41% |
| GASNF | $31.03 | +0.00% | 29.8B | 12.82 | $2.42 | +5.67% |
| GASNY | $6.15 | +0.16% | 29.5B | 12.81 | $0.48 | +5.66% |
| SNMRF | $6.05 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 12.87 | $0.47 | +5.12% |
| SNMRY | $11.71 | +1.30% | 19.6B | 12.45 | $0.94 | +4.00% |
| HOKCY | $0.88 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 21.40 | $0.04 | +5.21% |
| HOKCF | $0.86 | +0.00% | 16B | 21.50 | $0.04 | +5.20% |
| GAILF | $10.80 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 8.06 | $1.34 | +4.17% |
| TKGSY | $17.73 | +6.14% | 12.8B | 27.28 | $0.65 | +0.90% |
| TKGSF | $31.10 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 24.11 | $1.29 | +1.74% |
Stock Comparison
TGASF vs GASNF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while GASNF trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to GASNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check GASNF's competition here
TGASF vs GASNY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while GASNY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check GASNY's competition here
TGASF vs SNMRF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while SNMRF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to SNMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check SNMRF's competition here
TGASF vs SNMRY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while SNMRY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check SNMRY's competition here
TGASF vs HOKCY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while HOKCY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check HOKCY's competition here
TGASF vs HOKCF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while HOKCF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to HOKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check HOKCF's competition here
TGASF vs GAILF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while GAILF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to GAILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check GAILF's competition here
TGASF vs TKGSY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TKGSY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while TKGSY trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas TKGSY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKGSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to TKGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check TKGSY's competition here
TGASF vs TKGSF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TKGSF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while TKGSF trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas TKGSF's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to TKGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check TKGSF's competition here
TGASF vs OSGSY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while OSGSY trades at $50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check OSGSY's competition here
TGASF vs XNGSF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while XNGSF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to XNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check XNGSF's competition here
TGASF vs XNGSY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while XNGSY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check XNGSY's competition here
TGASF vs OSGSF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while OSGSF trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to OSGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check OSGSF's competition here
TGASF vs ATGFF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ATGFF trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ATGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ATGFF's competition here
TGASF vs ITGGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ITGGF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ITGGF's competition here
TGASF vs PNAGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while PNAGF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to PNAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check PNAGF's competition here
TGASF vs ENGGY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ENGGY trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ENGGY's competition here
TGASF vs APAJF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APAJF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while APAJF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas APAJF's P/E ratio is -123.25. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APAJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to APAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check APAJF's competition here
TGASF vs CRGGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CRGGF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to CRGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CRGGF's competition here
TGASF vs CGHLY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CGHLY trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to CGHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CGHLY's competition here
TGASF vs CGASY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CGASY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to CGASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CGASY's competition here
TGASF vs CGHOF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CGHOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to CGHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CGHOF's competition here
TGASF vs ENGH Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ENGH's competition here
TGASF vs ENGGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ENGGF trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to ENGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ENGGF's competition here
TGASF vs AGEEF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to AGEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check AGEEF's competition here
TGASF vs PPAAF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPAAF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while PPAAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas PPAAF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to PPAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check PPAAF's competition here
TGASF vs THOGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check THOGF's competition here
TGASF vs SRCU Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to SRCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check SRCU's competition here
TGASF vs SUUIF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while SUUIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check SUUIF's competition here
TGASF vs ASCOF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ASCOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ASCOF's competition here
TGASF vs NPPGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to NPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check NPPGF's competition here
TGASF vs BJGBF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while BJGBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to BJGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check BJGBF's competition here
TGASF vs PPAAY Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPAAY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while PPAAY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas PPAAY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to PPAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check PPAAY's competition here
TGASF vs EVGIF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while EVGIF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to EVGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check EVGIF's competition here
TGASF vs CGFEF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 79.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CGFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CGFEF's competition here
TGASF vs PTTN Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to PTTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check PTTN's competition here
TGASF vs CHNGQ Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CHNGQ's competition here
TGASF vs CTGSP Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while CTGSP trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas CTGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to CTGSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check CTGSP's competition here
TGASF vs ALTGF Comparison August 2025
TGASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGASF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALTGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGASF is priced at $0.45, while ALTGF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGASF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.96, whereas ALTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGASF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGASF is more volatile compared to ALTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGASF.Check ALTGF's competition here