Transwarranty Finance Limited (TFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TFL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFL.NS | ₹12.00 | -3.38% | 665.3M | -18.37 | -₹0.66 | N/A |
| JMFINANCIL.BO | ₹123.85 | -1.71% | 120.5B | 10.03 | ₹12.56 | +2.59% |
| JMFINANCIL.NS | ₹123.60 | -1.90% | 120B | 10.51 | ₹11.94 | +2.59% |
| IIFLCAPS.BO | ₹337.80 | -0.47% | 106.2B | 14.47 | ₹23.56 | +0.88% |
| MEDIASSIST.NS | ₹362.60 | -3.19% | 27.2B | 25.67 | ₹14.17 | N/A |
| AQFINTECH.BO | ₹1,226.85 | -0.16% | 19.2B | 1095.40 | ₹1.12 | N/A |
| MIIL.BO | ₹723.75 | -3.81% | 15.8B | 1919.47 | ₹0.38 | +0.01% |
| AKCAPIT.BO | ₹1,779.90 | -0.06% | 11.8B | 17.25 | ₹103.65 | +2.91% |
| LKPFIN.BO | ₹168.00 | -0.47% | 10.7B | -527.19 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| MASTERTR.BO | ₹76.23 | -2.41% | 9.4B | 4.81 | ₹15.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TFL.NS vs JMFINANCIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.BO has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while JMFINANCIL.BO trades at ₹123.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas JMFINANCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JMFINANCIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs JMFINANCIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.NS has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while JMFINANCIL.NS trades at ₹123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas JMFINANCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JMFINANCIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.NS's competition here
TFL.NS vs IIFLCAPS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.BO has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while IIFLCAPS.BO trades at ₹337.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas IIFLCAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IIFLCAPS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check IIFLCAPS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MEDIASSIST.NS Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹362.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here
TFL.NS vs AQFINTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, AQFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while AQFINTECH.BO trades at ₹1,226.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas AQFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 1095.40. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AQFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to AQFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check AQFINTECH.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹723.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1919.47. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs AKCAPIT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, AKCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while AKCAPIT.BO trades at ₹1,779.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas AKCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AKCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to AKCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check AKCAPIT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs LKPFIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, LKPFIN.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while LKPFIN.BO trades at ₹168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas LKPFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -527.19. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LKPFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to LKPFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check LKPFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MASTERTR.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MASTERTR.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MASTERTR.BO trades at ₹76.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MASTERTR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MASTERTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MASTERTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MASTERTR.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs GCSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, GCSL.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while GCSL.BO trades at ₹419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GCSL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GCSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to GCSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check GCSL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SYSTMTXC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SYSTMTXC.BO trades at ₹66.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SYSTMTXC.BO's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SYSTMTXC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SYSTMTXC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ARYAMAN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ARYAMAN.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ARYAMAN.BO trades at ₹593.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ARYAMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARYAMAN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARYAMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ARYAMAN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs KIRANVYPAR.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, KIRANVYPAR.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while KIRANVYPAR.BO trades at ₹192.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KIRANVYPAR.BO's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check KIRANVYPAR.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ARYACAPM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ARYACAPM.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ARYACAPM.BO trades at ₹400.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ARYACAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARYACAPM.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARYACAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ARYACAPM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SRAMSET.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SRAMSET.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SRAMSET.BO trades at ₹272.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SRAMSET.BO's P/E ratio is -31.24. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRAMSET.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SRAMSET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SRAMSET.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs UCIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, UCIL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while UCIL.BO trades at ₹101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas UCIL.BO's P/E ratio is -30.04. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UCIL.BO's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to UCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check UCIL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs IMCAP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, IMCAP.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while IMCAP.BO trades at ₹914.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas IMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 229.89. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IMCAP.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to IMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check IMCAP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ALSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ALSL.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ALSL.BO trades at ₹67.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ALSL.BO's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALSL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ALSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ALSL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs OIVL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, OIVL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while OIVL.BO trades at ₹5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas OIVL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OIVL.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to OIVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check OIVL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PHCAP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PHCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PHCAP.BO trades at ₹977.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PHCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PHCAP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to PHCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PHCAP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs NIDHGRN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, NIDHGRN.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while NIDHGRN.BO trades at ₹365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NIDHGRN.BO's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NIDHGRN.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to NIDHGRN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check NIDHGRN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs QUESTCAP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, QUESTCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while QUESTCAP.BO trades at ₹285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas QUESTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QUESTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to QUESTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check QUESTCAP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs HAMPTON.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, HAMPTON.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while HAMPTON.BO trades at ₹9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas HAMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is -304.51. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HAMPTON.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to HAMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check HAMPTON.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs REGENCY.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, REGENCY.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while REGENCY.BO trades at ₹39.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas REGENCY.BO's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to REGENCY.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to REGENCY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check REGENCY.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs IVC.NS Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, IVC.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while IVC.NS trades at ₹8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas IVC.NS's P/E ratio is 68.22. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IVC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to IVC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check IVC.NS's competition here
TFL.NS vs IVC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, IVC.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while IVC.BO trades at ₹8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas IVC.BO's P/E ratio is 67.73. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IVC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to IVC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check IVC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SHARDUL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SHARDUL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SHARDUL.BO trades at ₹28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SHARDUL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SHARDUL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SHARDUL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs TAMBOLIIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, TAMBOLIIN.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while TAMBOLIIN.BO trades at ₹226.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TAMBOLIIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check TAMBOLIIN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs VISCO.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, VISCO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while VISCO.BO trades at ₹92.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VISCO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VISCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to VISCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check VISCO.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SODFC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SODFC.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SODFC.BO trades at ₹124.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SODFC.BO's P/E ratio is -1782.86. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SODFC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SODFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SODFC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs JHACC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, JHACC.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while JHACC.BO trades at ₹189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas JHACC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JHACC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to JHACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check JHACC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PROFINC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PROFINC.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PROFINC.BO trades at ₹2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PROFINC.BO's P/E ratio is 84.29. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PROFINC.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to PROFINC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PROFINC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs CGFL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, CGFL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while CGFL.BO trades at ₹29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CGFL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CGFL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to CGFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check CGFL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ARIHCAPM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ARIHCAPM.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ARIHCAPM.BO trades at ₹68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ARIHCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARIHCAPM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ARIHCAPM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs LKPSEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, LKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while LKPSEC.BO trades at ₹16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas LKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to LKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check LKPSEC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs KEYFINSERV.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while KEYFINSERV.BO trades at ₹242.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KEYFINSERV.BO's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KEYFINSERV.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check KEYFINSERV.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs DHARNI.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, DHARNI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while DHARNI.BO trades at ₹65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DHARNI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DHARNI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to DHARNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check DHARNI.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs UPSURGE.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, UPSURGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while UPSURGE.BO trades at ₹59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas UPSURGE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UPSURGE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to UPSURGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check UPSURGE.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs INDUSFINL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, INDUSFINL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while INDUSFINL.BO trades at ₹131.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas INDUSFINL.BO's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INDUSFINL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSFINL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check INDUSFINL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SWASTIKA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SWASTIKA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SWASTIKA.BO trades at ₹63.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SWASTIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWASTIKA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to SWASTIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SWASTIKA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs VISTARAMAR.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, VISTARAMAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while VISTARAMAR.BO trades at ₹202.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VISTARAMAR.BO's P/E ratio is 45.16. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VISTARAMAR.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to VISTARAMAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check VISTARAMAR.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SCL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SCL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SCL.BO trades at ₹0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SCL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SCL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs VGCL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, VGCL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while VGCL.BO trades at ₹54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGCL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to VGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check VGCL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ESCORP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ESCORP.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ESCORP.BO trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ESCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ESCORP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PIONRINV.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PIONRINV.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PIONRINV.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PIONRINV.BO's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PIONRINV.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to PIONRINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PIONRINV.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs NAYSAA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, NAYSAA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while NAYSAA.BO trades at ₹307.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NAYSAA.BO's P/E ratio is 379.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NAYSAA.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to NAYSAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check NAYSAA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs AARNAV.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, AARNAV.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while AARNAV.BO trades at ₹25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas AARNAV.BO's P/E ratio is 75.96. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AARNAV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to AARNAV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check AARNAV.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs TITANSEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, TITANSEC.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while TITANSEC.BO trades at ₹42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TITANSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TITANSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to TITANSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check TITANSEC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ASITCFIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ASITCFIN.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ASITCFIN.BO trades at ₹123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ASITCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASITCFIN.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ASITCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ASITCFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SAUMYA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SAUMYA.BO has a market cap of 988M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SAUMYA.BO trades at ₹143.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SAUMYA.BO's P/E ratio is -22.56. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAUMYA.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SAUMYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SAUMYA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs GOWRALE.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, GOWRALE.BO has a market cap of 970.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while GOWRALE.BO trades at ₹119.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GOWRALE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOWRALE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to GOWRALE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check GOWRALE.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MUNCAPM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MUNCAPM.BO has a market cap of 951.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MUNCAPM.BO trades at ₹103.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MUNCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is -546.32. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MUNCAPM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUNCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MUNCAPM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ASSAMENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ASSAMENT.BO has a market cap of 865.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ASSAMENT.BO trades at ₹601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ASSAMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASSAMENT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ASSAMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ASSAMENT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MUKESHB.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MUKESHB.BO has a market cap of 852.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MUKESHB.BO trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MUKESHB.BO's P/E ratio is -50.52. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MUKESHB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUKESHB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MUKESHB.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs CHRTEDCA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, CHRTEDCA.BO has a market cap of 794.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while CHRTEDCA.BO trades at ₹263.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CHRTEDCA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHRTEDCA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to CHRTEDCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check CHRTEDCA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ADVIKCA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ADVIKCA.BO has a market cap of 785M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ADVIKCA.BO trades at ₹1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ADVIKCA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADVIKCA.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ADVIKCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ADVIKCA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs WALLFORT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, WALLFORT.BO has a market cap of 775M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while WALLFORT.BO trades at ₹80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas WALLFORT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WALLFORT.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to WALLFORT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check WALLFORT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SKPSEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 761.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SKPSEC.BO trades at ₹110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SKPSEC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs GOGIACAP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, GOGIACAP.BO has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while GOGIACAP.BO trades at ₹113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GOGIACAP.BO's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOGIACAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to GOGIACAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check GOGIACAP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ROYALIND.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ROYALIND.BO has a market cap of 707.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ROYALIND.BO trades at ₹6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ROYALIND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ROYALIND.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ROYALIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ROYALIND.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ELIXIR.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ELIXIR.BO has a market cap of 699.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ELIXIR.BO trades at ₹115.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ELIXIR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELIXIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ELIXIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ELIXIR.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs JOINDRE.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, JOINDRE.BO has a market cap of 675.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while JOINDRE.BO trades at ₹48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas JOINDRE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JOINDRE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to JOINDRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check JOINDRE.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs HBPOR.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, HBPOR.BO has a market cap of 645.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while HBPOR.BO trades at ₹58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas HBPOR.BO's P/E ratio is -28.16. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HBPOR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to HBPOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check HBPOR.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs BAMPSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, BAMPSL.BO has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while BAMPSL.BO trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BAMPSL.BO's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BAMPSL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to BAMPSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check BAMPSL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MYMONEY.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MYMONEY.BO has a market cap of 609.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MYMONEY.BO trades at ₹40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MYMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MYMONEY.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MYMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MYMONEY.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs DHANCOT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, DHANCOT.BO has a market cap of 556.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while DHANCOT.BO trades at ₹113.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DHANCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 671.76. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DHANCOT.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to DHANCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check DHANCOT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ISLCONSUL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ISLCONSUL.BO has a market cap of 551.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ISLCONSUL.BO trades at ₹21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ISLCONSUL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.05. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ISLCONSUL.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ISLCONSUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ISLCONSUL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs LADDERUP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, LADDERUP.BO has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while LADDERUP.BO trades at ₹47.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas LADDERUP.BO's P/E ratio is 60.84. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LADDERUP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to LADDERUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check LADDERUP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SMIFS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SMIFS.BO has a market cap of 479.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SMIFS.BO trades at ₹81.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SMIFS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMIFS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SMIFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SMIFS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MEAPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MEAPL.BO has a market cap of 471.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MEAPL.BO trades at ₹30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MEAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MEAPL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MEAPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MEAPL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs MEFCOMCAP.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, MEFCOMCAP.BO has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while MEFCOMCAP.BO trades at ₹9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MEFCOMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check MEFCOMCAP.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs BRIDGESE.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, BRIDGESE.BO has a market cap of 455M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while BRIDGESE.BO trades at ₹14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BRIDGESE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRIDGESE.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIDGESE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check BRIDGESE.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SRESTHA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SRESTHA.BO has a market cap of 421.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SRESTHA.BO trades at ₹0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SRESTHA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRESTHA.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to SRESTHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SRESTHA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SAICAPI.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SAICAPI.BO has a market cap of 419.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SAICAPI.BO trades at ₹155.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SAICAPI.BO's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAICAPI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SAICAPI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SAICAPI.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SITAENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SITAENT.BO has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SITAENT.BO trades at ₹143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SITAENT.BO's P/E ratio is -131.07. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SITAENT.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to SITAENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SITAENT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PANINDIAC.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PANINDIAC.BO has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PANINDIAC.BO trades at ₹1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PANINDIAC.BO's P/E ratio is 1156.25. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PANINDIAC.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to PANINDIAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PANINDIAC.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs NAM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, NAM.BO has a market cap of 391.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while NAM.BO trades at ₹74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NAM.BO's P/E ratio is 290.12. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to NAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check NAM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs KIDUJA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, KIDUJA.BO has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while KIDUJA.BO trades at ₹15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KIDUJA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIDUJA.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to KIDUJA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check KIDUJA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs AJCON.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, AJCON.BO has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while AJCON.BO trades at ₹5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas AJCON.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AJCON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to AJCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check AJCON.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ANUPAM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ANUPAM.BO has a market cap of 373.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ANUPAM.BO trades at ₹1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ANUPAM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ANUPAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ANUPAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ANUPAM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs HBSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, HBSL.BO has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while HBSL.BO trades at ₹51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas HBSL.BO's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HBSL.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to HBSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check HBSL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SHRINIWAS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SHRINIWAS.BO has a market cap of 352.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SHRINIWAS.BO trades at ₹11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SHRINIWAS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SHRINIWAS.BO's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRINIWAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SHRINIWAS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs 21STCENMGM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, 21STCENMGM.BO has a market cap of 341.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while 21STCENMGM.BO trades at ₹33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas 21STCENMGM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 21STCENMGM.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to 21STCENMGM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check 21STCENMGM.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ARNOLD.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ARNOLD.BO has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ARNOLD.BO trades at ₹13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ARNOLD.BO's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARNOLD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARNOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ARNOLD.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SPCAPIT.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SPCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 318.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SPCAPIT.BO trades at ₹53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SPCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SPCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SPCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SPCAPIT.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs GOLDLINE.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, GOLDLINE.BO has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while GOLDLINE.BO trades at ₹0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GOLDLINE.BO's P/E ratio is 610.00. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOLDLINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check GOLDLINE.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SUMEDHA.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SUMEDHA.BO has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SUMEDHA.BO trades at ₹38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SUMEDHA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SUMEDHA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SUMEDHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SUMEDHA.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs BIOGEN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, BIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while BIOGEN.BO trades at ₹0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to BIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check BIOGEN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs GALACTICO.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, GALACTICO.BO has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while GALACTICO.BO trades at ₹2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GALACTICO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GALACTICO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to GALACTICO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check GALACTICO.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs SULABEN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, SULABEN.BO has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while SULABEN.BO trades at ₹2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SULABEN.BO's P/E ratio is 173.89. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SULABEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to SULABEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check SULABEN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs STANROS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, STANROS.BO has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while STANROS.BO trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas STANROS.BO's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STANROS.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to STANROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check STANROS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs RAMSONS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, RAMSONS.BO has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while RAMSONS.BO trades at ₹88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas RAMSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RAMSONS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check RAMSONS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ARUNIS.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ARUNIS.BO has a market cap of 268.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ARUNIS.BO trades at ₹84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ARUNIS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARUNIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARUNIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ARUNIS.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs KJMCFIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, KJMCFIN.BO has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while KJMCFIN.BO trades at ₹53.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KJMCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KJMCFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to KJMCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check KJMCFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs INDIANVSH.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, INDIANVSH.BO has a market cap of 266.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while INDIANVSH.BO trades at ₹7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas INDIANVSH.BO's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INDIANVSH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANVSH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check INDIANVSH.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs ABHIFIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, ABHIFIN.BO has a market cap of 262.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while ABHIFIN.BO trades at ₹59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ABHIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 262.37. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABHIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to ABHIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check ABHIFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs BERVINL.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, BERVINL.BO has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while BERVINL.BO trades at ₹45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BERVINL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BERVINL.BO's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to BERVINL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check BERVINL.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PHOTON.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PHOTON.BO has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PHOTON.BO trades at ₹169.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PHOTON.BO's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PHOTON.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is more volatile compared to PHOTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PHOTON.BO's competition here
TFL.NS vs PURSHOTTAM.BO Comparison July 2026
TFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.NS stands at 665.3M. In comparison, PURSHOTTAM.BO has a market cap of 247.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.NS is priced at ₹12.00, while PURSHOTTAM.BO trades at ₹32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PURSHOTTAM.BO's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, TFL.NS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.NS is less volatile compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.NS.Check PURSHOTTAM.BO's competition here