Regency Fincorp Limited
Regency Fincorp Limited (REGENCY.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REGENCY.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGENCY.BO | ₹26.93 | -3.68% | 1.9B | 20.05 | ₹1.36 | N/A |
| MEDIASSIST.NS | ₹365.05 | +4.23% | 27.2B | 46.53 | ₹7.84 | N/A |
| SGFIN.BO | ₹517.65 | +10.56% | 25.9B | 26.18 | ₹17.73 | N/A |
| AQFINTECH.BO | ₹1,226.85 | -0.16% | 19.2B | 1095.40 | ₹1.12 | N/A |
| LKPFIN.BO | ₹186.45 | +0.32% | 11.9B | -586.87 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| AKCAPIT.BO | ₹1,573.50 | +1.77% | 10.4B | 10.00 | ₹157.44 | +3.30% |
| INDPRUD.BO | ₹6,117.50 | +3.63% | 10.2B | 16.25 | ₹373.04 | +1.81% |
| SYSTMTXC.BO | ₹69.66 | -3.37% | 9.7B | 32.66 | ₹2.17 | +0.14% |
| MASTERTR.BO | ₹77.72 | +6.73% | 9.5B | 7.97 | ₹9.71 | N/A |
| GCSL.BO | ₹340.25 | +2.47% | 7.7B | -60.40 | -₹5.62 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
REGENCY.BO vs MEDIASSIST.NS Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹365.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 46.53. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹517.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs AQFINTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AQFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while AQFINTECH.BO trades at ₹1,226.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AQFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 1095.40. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to AQFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check AQFINTECH.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs LKPFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LKPFIN.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while LKPFIN.BO trades at ₹186.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas LKPFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -586.87. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKPFIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to LKPFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check LKPFIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs AKCAPIT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while AKCAPIT.BO trades at ₹1,573.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AKCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to AKCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check AKCAPIT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs INDPRUD.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INDPRUD.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while INDPRUD.BO trades at ₹6,117.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas INDPRUD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDPRUD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to INDPRUD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check INDPRUD.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SYSTMTXC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SYSTMTXC.BO trades at ₹69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SYSTMTXC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYSTMTXC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SYSTMTXC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MASTERTR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MASTERTR.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MASTERTR.BO trades at ₹77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MASTERTR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MASTERTR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to MASTERTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MASTERTR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GCSL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GCSL.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GCSL.BO trades at ₹340.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GCSL.BO's P/E ratio is -60.40. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GCSL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to GCSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GCSL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ARYAMAN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARYAMAN.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ARYAMAN.BO trades at ₹608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARYAMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARYAMAN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ARYAMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ARYAMAN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ARYACAPM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARYACAPM.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ARYACAPM.BO trades at ₹475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARYACAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARYACAPM.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to ARYACAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ARYACAPM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SRAMSET.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SRAMSET.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SRAMSET.BO trades at ₹319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SRAMSET.BO's P/E ratio is -27.96. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRAMSET.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SRAMSET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SRAMSET.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs KIRANVYPAR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KIRANVYPAR.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while KIRANVYPAR.BO trades at ₹192.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas KIRANVYPAR.BO's P/E ratio is 294.06. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check KIRANVYPAR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs UCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UCIL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while UCIL.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas UCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCIL.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to UCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check UCIL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs OIVL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OIVL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while OIVL.BO trades at ₹6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas OIVL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OIVL.BO's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to OIVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check OIVL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs HAMPTON.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HAMPTON.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while HAMPTON.BO trades at ₹11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas HAMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is -18.81. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAMPTON.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to HAMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check HAMPTON.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs IMCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IMCAP.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while IMCAP.BO trades at ₹914.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas IMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 229.89. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMCAP.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to IMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check IMCAP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PROFINC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PROFINC.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PROFINC.BO trades at ₹4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PROFINC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PROFINC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PROFINC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PROFINC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ALSL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALSL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ALSL.BO trades at ₹57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ALSL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ALSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ALSL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs QUESTCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QUESTCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while QUESTCAP.BO trades at ₹260.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas QUESTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QUESTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to QUESTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check QUESTCAP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SHARDUL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHARDUL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SHARDUL.BO trades at ₹27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SHARDUL.BO's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHARDUL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SHARDUL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs VISCO.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VISCO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while VISCO.BO trades at ₹92.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas VISCO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VISCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to VISCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check VISCO.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SODFC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SODFC.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SODFC.BO trades at ₹124.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SODFC.BO's P/E ratio is -1782.86. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SODFC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SODFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SODFC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs NIDHGRN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NIDHGRN.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while NIDHGRN.BO trades at ₹272.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas NIDHGRN.BO's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIDHGRN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to NIDHGRN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check NIDHGRN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PHCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHCAP.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PHCAP.BO trades at ₹579.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PHCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -94.09. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHCAP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PHCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PHCAP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs JHACC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JHACC.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while JHACC.BO trades at ₹175.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas JHACC.BO's P/E ratio is 131.53. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JHACC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to JHACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check JHACC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs CGFL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGFL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while CGFL.BO trades at ₹28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CGFL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGFL.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to CGFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check CGFL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs TAMBOLIIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TAMBOLIIN.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while TAMBOLIIN.BO trades at ₹152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas TAMBOLIIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check TAMBOLIIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs LKPSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while LKPSEC.BO trades at ₹17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas LKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to LKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check LKPSEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PMCFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PMCFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PMCFIN.BO trades at ₹1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PMCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMCFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PMCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PMCFIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ARIHCAPM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARIHCAPM.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ARIHCAPM.BO trades at ₹68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARIHCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHCAPM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ARIHCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ARIHCAPM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs UPSURGE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UPSURGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while UPSURGE.BO trades at ₹66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas UPSURGE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPSURGE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to UPSURGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check UPSURGE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PIONRINV.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PIONRINV.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PIONRINV.BO trades at ₹107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PIONRINV.BO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PIONRINV.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PIONRINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PIONRINV.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs DHARNI.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DHARNI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while DHARNI.BO trades at ₹63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas DHARNI.BO's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHARNI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to DHARNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check DHARNI.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ESCORP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESCORP.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ESCORP.BO trades at ₹114.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ESCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESCORP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ESCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ESCORP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SWASTIKA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SWASTIKA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SWASTIKA.BO trades at ₹63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SWASTIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 90.84. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWASTIKA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SWASTIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SWASTIKA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs TITANSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TITANSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while TITANSEC.BO trades at ₹51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas TITANSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TITANSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to TITANSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check TITANSEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs VISTARAMAR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VISTARAMAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while VISTARAMAR.BO trades at ₹210.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas VISTARAMAR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VISTARAMAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to VISTARAMAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check VISTARAMAR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SCL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SCL.BO trades at ₹0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SCL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ADVIKCA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADVIKCA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ADVIKCA.BO trades at ₹1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ADVIKCA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADVIKCA.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ADVIKCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ADVIKCA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs NAYSAA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NAYSAA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while NAYSAA.BO trades at ₹307.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas NAYSAA.BO's P/E ratio is 379.26. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAYSAA.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to NAYSAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check NAYSAA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ASITCFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASITCFIN.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ASITCFIN.BO trades at ₹126.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ASITCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -140.68. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASITCFIN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to ASITCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ASITCFIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs AARNAV.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AARNAV.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while AARNAV.BO trades at ₹24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AARNAV.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AARNAV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to AARNAV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check AARNAV.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MUNCAPM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MUNCAPM.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MUNCAPM.BO trades at ₹111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MUNCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 506.82. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUNCAPM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to MUNCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MUNCAPM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ASSAMENT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASSAMENT.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ASSAMENT.BO trades at ₹737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ASSAMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASSAMENT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to ASSAMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ASSAMENT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs VGCL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VGCL.BO has a market cap of 956.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while VGCL.BO trades at ₹50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas VGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to VGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check VGCL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs CHRTEDCA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHRTEDCA.BO has a market cap of 870.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while CHRTEDCA.BO trades at ₹275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CHRTEDCA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHRTEDCA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to CHRTEDCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check CHRTEDCA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SAUMYA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAUMYA.BO has a market cap of 849.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SAUMYA.BO trades at ₹128.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SAUMYA.BO's P/E ratio is -24.81. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAUMYA.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SAUMYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SAUMYA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MYMONEY.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MYMONEY.BO has a market cap of 808.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MYMONEY.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MYMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is -89.11. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYMONEY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to MYMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MYMONEY.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MUKESHB.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MUKESHB.BO has a market cap of 801.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MUKESHB.BO trades at ₹114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MUKESHB.BO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUKESHB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to MUKESHB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MUKESHB.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ROYALIND.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ROYALIND.BO has a market cap of 757.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ROYALIND.BO trades at ₹6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ROYALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROYALIND.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ROYALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ROYALIND.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs WALLFORT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WALLFORT.BO has a market cap of 755.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while WALLFORT.BO trades at ₹78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas WALLFORT.BO's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WALLFORT.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to WALLFORT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check WALLFORT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SKPSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 736.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SKPSEC.BO trades at ₹108.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SKPSEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GOGIACAP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOGIACAP.BO has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GOGIACAP.BO trades at ₹113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GOGIACAP.BO's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOGIACAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to GOGIACAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GOGIACAP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs BNRSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BNRSEC.BO has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while BNRSEC.BO trades at ₹16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas BNRSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNRSEC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to BNRSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check BNRSEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs BAMPSL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BAMPSL.BO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while BAMPSL.BO trades at ₹19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas BAMPSL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAMPSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to BAMPSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check BAMPSL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GOWRALE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOWRALE.BO has a market cap of 654.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GOWRALE.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GOWRALE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOWRALE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to GOWRALE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GOWRALE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs JOINDRE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JOINDRE.BO has a market cap of 644.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while JOINDRE.BO trades at ₹46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas JOINDRE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JOINDRE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to JOINDRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check JOINDRE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs HBPOR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HBPOR.BO has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while HBPOR.BO trades at ₹58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas HBPOR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBPOR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to HBPOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check HBPOR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs INDUSFINL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INDUSFINL.BO has a market cap of 620.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while INDUSFINL.BO trades at ₹70.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas INDUSFINL.BO's P/E ratio is 97.10. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDUSFINL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to INDUSFINL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check INDUSFINL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MEAPL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEAPL.BO has a market cap of 606.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MEAPL.BO trades at ₹40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MEAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEAPL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to MEAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MEAPL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ELIXIR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELIXIR.BO has a market cap of 600.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ELIXIR.BO trades at ₹107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ELIXIR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELIXIR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ELIXIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ELIXIR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs LADDERUP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LADDERUP.BO has a market cap of 570.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while LADDERUP.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas LADDERUP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LADDERUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to LADDERUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check LADDERUP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ISLCONSUL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISLCONSUL.BO has a market cap of 539.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ISLCONSUL.BO trades at ₹22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ISLCONSUL.BO's P/E ratio is -64.26. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISLCONSUL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ISLCONSUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ISLCONSUL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs BRIDGESE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRIDGESE.BO has a market cap of 536.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while BRIDGESE.BO trades at ₹16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas BRIDGESE.BO's P/E ratio is 103.75. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIDGESE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to BRIDGESE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check BRIDGESE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs MEFCOMCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEFCOMCAP.BO has a market cap of 519.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while MEFCOMCAP.BO trades at ₹11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MEFCOMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -40.61. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check MEFCOMCAP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SITAENT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SITAENT.BO has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SITAENT.BO trades at ₹172.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SITAENT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SITAENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SITAENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SITAENT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SMIFS.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMIFS.BO has a market cap of 479.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SMIFS.BO trades at ₹81.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SMIFS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMIFS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SMIFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SMIFS.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs BIOGEN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while BIOGEN.BO trades at ₹0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas BIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to BIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check BIOGEN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs DHANCOT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DHANCOT.BO has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while DHANCOT.BO trades at ₹95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas DHANCOT.BO's P/E ratio is -33.19. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHANCOT.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to DHANCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check DHANCOT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SRESTHA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SRESTHA.BO has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SRESTHA.BO trades at ₹0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SRESTHA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRESTHA.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SRESTHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SRESTHA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs AJCON.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AJCON.BO has a market cap of 434.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while AJCON.BO trades at ₹7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AJCON.BO's P/E ratio is -711.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJCON.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to AJCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check AJCON.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PANINDIAC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PANINDIAC.BO has a market cap of 419.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PANINDIAC.BO trades at ₹2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PANINDIAC.BO's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANINDIAC.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PANINDIAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PANINDIAC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ANUPAM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ANUPAM.BO has a market cap of 419.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ANUPAM.BO trades at ₹2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ANUPAM.BO's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANUPAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ANUPAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ANUPAM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SAICAPI.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAICAPI.BO has a market cap of 415.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SAICAPI.BO trades at ₹151.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SAICAPI.BO's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAICAPI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SAICAPI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SAICAPI.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs BERVINL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BERVINL.BO has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while BERVINL.BO trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas BERVINL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BERVINL.BO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to BERVINL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check BERVINL.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs KIDUJA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KIDUJA.BO has a market cap of 390.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while KIDUJA.BO trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas KIDUJA.BO's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KIDUJA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to KIDUJA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check KIDUJA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs NAM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NAM.BO has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while NAM.BO trades at ₹69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas NAM.BO's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to NAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check NAM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SHRINIWAS.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHRINIWAS.BO has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SHRINIWAS.BO trades at ₹10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SHRINIWAS.BO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRINIWAS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SHRINIWAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SHRINIWAS.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SPCAPIT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SPCAPIT.BO trades at ₹54.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SPCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to SPCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SPCAPIT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ARNOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARNOLD.BO has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ARNOLD.BO trades at ₹14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARNOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARNOLD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ARNOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ARNOLD.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GOLDLINE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOLDLINE.BO has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GOLDLINE.BO trades at ₹0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GOLDLINE.BO's P/E ratio is 610.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLDLINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDLINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GOLDLINE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SUMEDHA.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUMEDHA.BO has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SUMEDHA.BO trades at ₹38.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SUMEDHA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUMEDHA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SUMEDHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SUMEDHA.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs ARUNIS.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARUNIS.BO has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while ARUNIS.BO trades at ₹98.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARUNIS.BO's P/E ratio is 56.72. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARUNIS.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to ARUNIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check ARUNIS.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GALACTICO.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GALACTICO.BO has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GALACTICO.BO trades at ₹1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GALACTICO.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GALACTICO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to GALACTICO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GALACTICO.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs PURSHOTTAM.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PURSHOTTAM.BO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while PURSHOTTAM.BO trades at ₹37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas PURSHOTTAM.BO's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check PURSHOTTAM.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs INDIANVSH.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INDIANVSH.BO has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while INDIANVSH.BO trades at ₹7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas INDIANVSH.BO's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDIANVSH.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANVSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check INDIANVSH.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SULABEN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SULABEN.BO has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SULABEN.BO trades at ₹2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SULABEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SULABEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to SULABEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SULABEN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs RAMSONS.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RAMSONS.BO has a market cap of 273.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while RAMSONS.BO trades at ₹90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas RAMSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAMSONS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to RAMSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check RAMSONS.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs STANROS.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STANROS.BO has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while STANROS.BO trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas STANROS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STANROS.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to STANROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check STANROS.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs KJMCFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KJMCFIN.BO has a market cap of 262.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while KJMCFIN.BO trades at ₹55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas KJMCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KJMCFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to KJMCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check KJMCFIN.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs KJMCCORP.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KJMCCORP.BO has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while KJMCCORP.BO trades at ₹59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas KJMCCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KJMCCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to KJMCCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check KJMCCORP.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs HELPAGE.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HELPAGE.BO has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while HELPAGE.BO trades at ₹23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas HELPAGE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HELPAGE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to HELPAGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check HELPAGE.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs NDASEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NDASEC.BO has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while NDASEC.BO trades at ₹36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas NDASEC.BO's P/E ratio is 159.21. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NDASEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to NDASEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check NDASEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs GAJANANSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GAJANANSEC.BO has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while GAJANANSEC.BO trades at ₹70.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GAJANANSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAJANANSEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to GAJANANSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check GAJANANSEC.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs STEP2COR.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STEP2COR.BO has a market cap of 225.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while STEP2COR.BO trades at ₹31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas STEP2COR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STEP2COR.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to STEP2COR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check STEP2COR.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs VERTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VERTEX.BO has a market cap of 223.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while VERTEX.BO trades at ₹3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas VERTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -19.69. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VERTEX.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to VERTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check VERTEX.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs SICAPIT.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SICAPIT.BO has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while SICAPIT.BO trades at ₹41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SICAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SICAPIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is more volatile compared to SICAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check SICAPIT.BO's competition here
REGENCY.BO vs RFSL.BO Comparison April 2026
REGENCY.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCY.BO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RFSL.BO has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCY.BO is priced at ₹26.93, while RFSL.BO trades at ₹28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCY.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas RFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, REGENCY.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RFSL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCY.BO is less volatile compared to RFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCY.BO.Check RFSL.BO's competition here