Credent Global Finance Ltd.
Credent Global Finance Ltd. (CGFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGFL.BO | ₹27.63 | -4.00% | 1.5B | 5.43 | ₹5.25 | N/A |
| SGFIN.BO | ₹577.80 | +0.32% | 32.2B | 25.70 | ₹22.40 | N/A |
| MEDIASSIST.NS | ₹386.00 | -0.77% | 29.8B | 50.93 | ₹7.83 | N/A |
| AQFINTECH.BO | ₹1,226.85 | -0.16% | 19.2B | 1095.40 | ₹1.12 | N/A |
| LKPFIN.BO | ₹186.65 | -4.28% | 12.4B | -611.41 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| INDPRUD.BO | ₹6,516.00 | -1.48% | 11B | 17.56 | ₹373.55 | +1.68% |
| MASTERTR.BO | ₹86.11 | +3.78% | 10.8B | 9.59 | ₹9.15 | N/A |
| AKCAPIT.BO | ₹1,560.00 | +0.48% | 10.3B | 9.91 | ₹157.43 | +3.33% |
| SYSTMTXC.BO | ₹67.01 | +0.01% | 9.2B | 31.92 | ₹2.10 | +0.15% |
| GCSL.BO | ₹395.80 | +4.16% | 8.6B | -63.79 | -₹5.97 | +0.12% |
Stock Comparison
CGFL.BO vs SGFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹577.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MEDIASSIST.NS Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here
CGFL.BO vs AQFINTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AQFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while AQFINTECH.BO trades at ₹1,226.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas AQFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 1095.40. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AQFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to AQFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check AQFINTECH.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs LKPFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LKPFIN.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while LKPFIN.BO trades at ₹186.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas LKPFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -611.41. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LKPFIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to LKPFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check LKPFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs INDPRUD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDPRUD.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while INDPRUD.BO trades at ₹6,516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas INDPRUD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDPRUD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDPRUD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check INDPRUD.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MASTERTR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MASTERTR.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MASTERTR.BO trades at ₹86.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MASTERTR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MASTERTR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASTERTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MASTERTR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs AKCAPIT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AKCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while AKCAPIT.BO trades at ₹1,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas AKCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AKCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to AKCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check AKCAPIT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SYSTMTXC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SYSTMTXC.BO trades at ₹67.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SYSTMTXC.BO's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SYSTMTXC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SYSTMTXC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GCSL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GCSL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GCSL.BO trades at ₹395.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GCSL.BO's P/E ratio is -63.79. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GCSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to GCSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GCSL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ARYAMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARYAMAN.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ARYAMAN.BO trades at ₹600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ARYAMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARYAMAN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARYAMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ARYAMAN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ARYACAPM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARYACAPM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ARYACAPM.BO trades at ₹431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ARYACAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARYACAPM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARYACAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ARYACAPM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SRAMSET.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SRAMSET.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SRAMSET.BO trades at ₹312.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SRAMSET.BO's P/E ratio is -27.34. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SRAMSET.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SRAMSET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SRAMSET.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs KIRANVYPAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIRANVYPAR.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while KIRANVYPAR.BO trades at ₹191.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas KIRANVYPAR.BO's P/E ratio is 299.61. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRANVYPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check KIRANVYPAR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs UCIL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UCIL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while UCIL.BO trades at ₹103.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas UCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UCIL.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to UCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check UCIL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs OIVL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OIVL.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while OIVL.BO trades at ₹6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas OIVL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OIVL.BO's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to OIVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check OIVL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ALSL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALSL.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ALSL.BO trades at ₹72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ALSL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ALSL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ALSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ALSL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs IMCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMCAP.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while IMCAP.BO trades at ₹914.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas IMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 229.89. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IMCAP.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to IMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check IMCAP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs HAMPTON.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HAMPTON.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while HAMPTON.BO trades at ₹10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas HAMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is -17.14. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HAMPTON.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to HAMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check HAMPTON.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs QUESTCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QUESTCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while QUESTCAP.BO trades at ₹272.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas QUESTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to QUESTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to QUESTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check QUESTCAP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SHARDUL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHARDUL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SHARDUL.BO trades at ₹30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SHARDUL.BO's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHARDUL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SHARDUL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs NIDHGRN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NIDHGRN.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while NIDHGRN.BO trades at ₹324.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas NIDHGRN.BO's P/E ratio is 51.32. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIDHGRN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to NIDHGRN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check NIDHGRN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs REGENCY.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REGENCY.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while REGENCY.BO trades at ₹34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas REGENCY.BO's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to REGENCY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to REGENCY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check REGENCY.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PROFINC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PROFINC.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PROFINC.BO trades at ₹3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PROFINC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PROFINC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to PROFINC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PROFINC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PHCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PHCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PHCAP.BO trades at ₹754.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PHCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 69.20. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHCAP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to PHCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PHCAP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs VISCO.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VISCO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while VISCO.BO trades at ₹92.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas VISCO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VISCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to VISCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check VISCO.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SODFC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SODFC.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SODFC.BO trades at ₹124.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SODFC.BO's P/E ratio is -1782.86. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SODFC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SODFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SODFC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs TAMBOLIIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TAMBOLIIN.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while TAMBOLIIN.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas TAMBOLIIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check TAMBOLIIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs JHACC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JHACC.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while JHACC.BO trades at ₹198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas JHACC.BO's P/E ratio is 146.84. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JHACC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to JHACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check JHACC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs LKPSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while LKPSEC.BO trades at ₹19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas LKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to LKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check LKPSEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs UPSURGE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UPSURGE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while UPSURGE.BO trades at ₹64.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas UPSURGE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UPSURGE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to UPSURGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check UPSURGE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ARIHCAPM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARIHCAPM.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ARIHCAPM.BO trades at ₹68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ARIHCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARIHCAPM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ARIHCAPM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PMCFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PMCFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PMCFIN.BO trades at ₹1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PMCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PMCFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to PMCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PMCFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PIONRINV.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PIONRINV.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PIONRINV.BO trades at ₹108.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PIONRINV.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PIONRINV.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to PIONRINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PIONRINV.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SWASTIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWASTIKA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SWASTIKA.BO trades at ₹68.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SWASTIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWASTIKA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SWASTIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SWASTIKA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs DHARNI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DHARNI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while DHARNI.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas DHARNI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.43. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DHARNI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check DHARNI.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs VGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VGCL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while VGCL.BO trades at ₹55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas VGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VGCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to VGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check VGCL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs VISTARAMAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VISTARAMAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while VISTARAMAR.BO trades at ₹206.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas VISTARAMAR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VISTARAMAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to VISTARAMAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check VISTARAMAR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SCL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SCL.BO trades at ₹0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SCL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SCL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ESCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESCORP.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ESCORP.BO trades at ₹109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ESCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ESCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ESCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ESCORP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ASSAMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASSAMENT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ASSAMENT.BO trades at ₹793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ASSAMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASSAMENT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASSAMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ASSAMENT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs NAYSAA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAYSAA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while NAYSAA.BO trades at ₹307.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas NAYSAA.BO's P/E ratio is 379.26. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NAYSAA.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to NAYSAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check NAYSAA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs TITANSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TITANSEC.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while TITANSEC.BO trades at ₹43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas TITANSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TITANSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to TITANSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check TITANSEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MUNCAPM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MUNCAPM.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MUNCAPM.BO trades at ₹111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MUNCAPM.BO's P/E ratio is 506.82. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MUNCAPM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUNCAPM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MUNCAPM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ASITCFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASITCFIN.BO has a market cap of 990.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ASITCFIN.BO trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ASITCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -133.44. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASITCFIN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASITCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ASITCFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs AARNAV.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AARNAV.BO has a market cap of 920.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while AARNAV.BO trades at ₹22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas AARNAV.BO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AARNAV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to AARNAV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check AARNAV.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs INDUSFINL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDUSFINL.BO has a market cap of 911.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while INDUSFINL.BO trades at ₹103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas INDUSFINL.BO's P/E ratio is 142.75. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDUSFINL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDUSFINL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check INDUSFINL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ADVIKCA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADVIKCA.BO has a market cap of 900.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ADVIKCA.BO trades at ₹1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ADVIKCA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADVIKCA.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ADVIKCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ADVIKCA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MUKESHB.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MUKESHB.BO has a market cap of 876.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MUKESHB.BO trades at ₹125.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MUKESHB.BO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MUKESHB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUKESHB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MUKESHB.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SAUMYA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAUMYA.BO has a market cap of 814.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SAUMYA.BO trades at ₹120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SAUMYA.BO's P/E ratio is -23.77. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAUMYA.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SAUMYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SAUMYA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs CHRTEDCA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHRTEDCA.BO has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while CHRTEDCA.BO trades at ₹256.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas CHRTEDCA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHRTEDCA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHRTEDCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check CHRTEDCA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MYMONEY.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MYMONEY.BO has a market cap of 806.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MYMONEY.BO trades at ₹43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MYMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is -88.89. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MYMONEY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to MYMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MYMONEY.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs WALLFORT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WALLFORT.BO has a market cap of 760.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while WALLFORT.BO trades at ₹74.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas WALLFORT.BO's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WALLFORT.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to WALLFORT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check WALLFORT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SKPSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKPSEC.BO has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SKPSEC.BO trades at ₹103.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SKPSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SKPSEC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SKPSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SKPSEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ROYALIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ROYALIND.BO has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ROYALIND.BO trades at ₹6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ROYALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROYALIND.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to ROYALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ROYALIND.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs BNRSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BNRSEC.BO has a market cap of 721M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while BNRSEC.BO trades at ₹17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas BNRSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BNRSEC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to BNRSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check BNRSEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GOGIACAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOGIACAP.BO has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GOGIACAP.BO trades at ₹113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GOGIACAP.BO's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOGIACAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to GOGIACAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GOGIACAP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ELIXIR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELIXIR.BO has a market cap of 687.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ELIXIR.BO trades at ₹118.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ELIXIR.BO's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ELIXIR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ELIXIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ELIXIR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs HBPOR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HBPOR.BO has a market cap of 667.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while HBPOR.BO trades at ₹61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas HBPOR.BO's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HBPOR.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to HBPOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check HBPOR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MEAPL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEAPL.BO has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MEAPL.BO trades at ₹41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MEAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MEAPL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to MEAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MEAPL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs BAMPSL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BAMPSL.BO has a market cap of 655.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while BAMPSL.BO trades at ₹19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas BAMPSL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BAMPSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAMPSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check BAMPSL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GOWRALE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOWRALE.BO has a market cap of 643M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GOWRALE.BO trades at ₹82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GOWRALE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOWRALE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to GOWRALE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GOWRALE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs JOINDRE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JOINDRE.BO has a market cap of 635.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while JOINDRE.BO trades at ₹47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas JOINDRE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JOINDRE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to JOINDRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check JOINDRE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs LADDERUP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LADDERUP.BO has a market cap of 632.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while LADDERUP.BO trades at ₹59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas LADDERUP.BO's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LADDERUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to LADDERUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check LADDERUP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs DHANCOT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DHANCOT.BO has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while DHANCOT.BO trades at ₹127.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas DHANCOT.BO's P/E ratio is -42.33. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DHANCOT.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check DHANCOT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs MEFCOMCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEFCOMCAP.BO has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while MEFCOMCAP.BO trades at ₹12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas MEFCOMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -44.11. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to MEFCOMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check MEFCOMCAP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs BRIDGESE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRIDGESE.BO has a market cap of 521.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while BRIDGESE.BO trades at ₹16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas BRIDGESE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BRIDGESE.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to BRIDGESE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check BRIDGESE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ISLCONSUL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ISLCONSUL.BO has a market cap of 492M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ISLCONSUL.BO trades at ₹20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ISLCONSUL.BO's P/E ratio is -58.57. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ISLCONSUL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ISLCONSUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ISLCONSUL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SMIFS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMIFS.BO has a market cap of 479.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SMIFS.BO trades at ₹81.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SMIFS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMIFS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SMIFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SMIFS.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs KIDUJA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIDUJA.BO has a market cap of 460.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while KIDUJA.BO trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas KIDUJA.BO's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KIDUJA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to KIDUJA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check KIDUJA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SRESTHA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SRESTHA.BO has a market cap of 457M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SRESTHA.BO trades at ₹0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SRESTHA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SRESTHA.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SRESTHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SRESTHA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SAICAPI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAICAPI.BO has a market cap of 443.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SAICAPI.BO trades at ₹150.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SAICAPI.BO's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAICAPI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAICAPI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SAICAPI.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SITAENT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SITAENT.BO has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SITAENT.BO trades at ₹152.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SITAENT.BO's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SITAENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SITAENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SITAENT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs NAM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAM.BO has a market cap of 426M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while NAM.BO trades at ₹82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas NAM.BO's P/E ratio is 207.89. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to NAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check NAM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PANINDIAC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PANINDIAC.BO has a market cap of 409.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PANINDIAC.BO trades at ₹1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PANINDIAC.BO's P/E ratio is -191.00. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PANINDIAC.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to PANINDIAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PANINDIAC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs AJCON.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AJCON.BO has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while AJCON.BO trades at ₹6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas AJCON.BO's P/E ratio is -658.00. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AJCON.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to AJCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check AJCON.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs BERVINL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BERVINL.BO has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while BERVINL.BO trades at ₹66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas BERVINL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BERVINL.BO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to BERVINL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check BERVINL.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs BIOGEN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while BIOGEN.BO trades at ₹0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas BIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to BIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check BIOGEN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ANUPAM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANUPAM.BO has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ANUPAM.BO trades at ₹2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ANUPAM.BO's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ANUPAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ANUPAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ANUPAM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SPCAPIT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPCAPIT.BO has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SPCAPIT.BO trades at ₹54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SPCAPIT.BO's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPCAPIT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SPCAPIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SPCAPIT.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SUMEDHA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUMEDHA.BO has a market cap of 341.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SUMEDHA.BO trades at ₹41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SUMEDHA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUMEDHA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to SUMEDHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SUMEDHA.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ARNOLD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARNOLD.BO has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ARNOLD.BO trades at ₹14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ARNOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARNOLD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to ARNOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ARNOLD.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SHRINIWAS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHRINIWAS.BO has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SHRINIWAS.BO trades at ₹10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SHRINIWAS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHRINIWAS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRINIWAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SHRINIWAS.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GOLDLINE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOLDLINE.BO has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GOLDLINE.BO trades at ₹0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GOLDLINE.BO's P/E ratio is 610.00. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOLDLINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to GOLDLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GOLDLINE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GALACTICO.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GALACTICO.BO has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GALACTICO.BO trades at ₹2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GALACTICO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GALACTICO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to GALACTICO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GALACTICO.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs SULABEN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SULABEN.BO has a market cap of 314.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while SULABEN.BO trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas SULABEN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SULABEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to SULABEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check SULABEN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs RAMSONS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAMSONS.BO has a market cap of 300.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while RAMSONS.BO trades at ₹95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas RAMSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RAMSONS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check RAMSONS.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs STANROS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STANROS.BO has a market cap of 286.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while STANROS.BO trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas STANROS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STANROS.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to STANROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check STANROS.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs INDIANVSH.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDIANVSH.BO has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while INDIANVSH.BO trades at ₹7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas INDIANVSH.BO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDIANVSH.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANVSH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check INDIANVSH.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ABHIFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABHIFIN.BO has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ABHIFIN.BO trades at ₹62.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ABHIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 987.83. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ABHIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to ABHIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ABHIFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs PURSHOTTAM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PURSHOTTAM.BO has a market cap of 272.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while PURSHOTTAM.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas PURSHOTTAM.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to PURSHOTTAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check PURSHOTTAM.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs ARUNIS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARUNIS.BO has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while ARUNIS.BO trades at ₹87.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas ARUNIS.BO's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARUNIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARUNIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check ARUNIS.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs KJMCFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KJMCFIN.BO has a market cap of 263.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while KJMCFIN.BO trades at ₹56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas KJMCFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KJMCFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to KJMCFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check KJMCFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs STEP2COR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STEP2COR.BO has a market cap of 242.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while STEP2COR.BO trades at ₹32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas STEP2COR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STEP2COR.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to STEP2COR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check STEP2COR.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs HELPAGE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HELPAGE.BO has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while HELPAGE.BO trades at ₹22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas HELPAGE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HELPAGE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to HELPAGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check HELPAGE.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs KJMCCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KJMCCORP.BO has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while KJMCCORP.BO trades at ₹52.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas KJMCCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KJMCCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to KJMCCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check KJMCCORP.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GSBFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSBFIN.BO has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GSBFIN.BO trades at ₹34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GSBFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -194.39. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GSBFIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to GSBFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GSBFIN.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs GAJANANSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GAJANANSEC.BO has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while GAJANANSEC.BO trades at ₹63.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas GAJANANSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GAJANANSEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is less volatile compared to GAJANANSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check GAJANANSEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs NDASEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NDASEC.BO has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while NDASEC.BO trades at ₹34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas NDASEC.BO's P/E ratio is 143.71. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NDASEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to NDASEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check NDASEC.BO's competition here
CGFL.BO vs VERTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
CGFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGFL.BO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VERTEX.BO has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGFL.BO is priced at ₹27.63, while VERTEX.BO trades at ₹2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.43, whereas VERTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, CGFL.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VERTEX.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGFL.BO is more volatile compared to VERTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGFL.BO.Check VERTEX.BO's competition here