TARC Limited
TARC Limited (TARC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TARC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TARC.NS | ₹157.48 | +0.00% | 46.3B | -53.02 | -₹2.96 | N/A |
| DLF.NS | ₹620.50 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 35.18 | ₹17.89 | +0.95% |
| DLF.BO | ₹620.60 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 35.21 | ₹17.87 | +0.95% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹1,067.05 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 32.01 | ₹33.46 | +0.40% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹1,064.70 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 32.02 | ₹33.45 | +0.40% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,503.40 | +0.00% | 553.9B | 24.75 | ₹61.54 | +0.53% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,502.70 | +0.00% | 553.8B | 24.74 | ₹61.57 | +0.53% |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,824.20 | +0.00% | 549.9B | 34.72 | ₹52.59 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,819.00 | +0.00% | 549.8B | 35.40 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| ANANTRAJ.BO | ₹545.55 | +0.00% | 197.5B | 36.08 | ₹15.21 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
TARC.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while DLF.NS trades at ₹620.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while DLF.BO trades at ₹620.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹1,067.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹1,064.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 553.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,503.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 553.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,502.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 549.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,824.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 549.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹545.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹545.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 181.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹740.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹739.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 162.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 113.30. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,497.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 113.07. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹1,037.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 4800.00. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹1,038.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 4793.10. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹365.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹365.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹346.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -67.99. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹417.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 141.10. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹417.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 140.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹118.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹117.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 60.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹406.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹405.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹712.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹711.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹712.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹711.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹439.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 62.77. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹442.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 62.24. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹232.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹531.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while TARC.BO trades at ₹157.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -53.09. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹263.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,186.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 770.75. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹332.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹360.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 61.37. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹360.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 61.01. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹463.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹463.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹210.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,435.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 231.10. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹143.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹549.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹549.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹92.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹80.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹592.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1699.86. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹260.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹1,088.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹639.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹263.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹317.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹307.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹296.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹301.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹161.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹67.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹68.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹201.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs YAARI.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YAARI.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs YAARI.BO Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, YAARI.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while YAARI.BO trades at ₹20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas YAARI.BO's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YAARI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to YAARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YAARI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUPREME.NS Comparison February 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 46.3B. In comparison, SUPREME.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹157.48, while SUPREME.NS trades at ₹58.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -53.02, whereas SUPREME.NS's P/E ratio is 77.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUPREME.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SUPREME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUPREME.NS's competition here