TARC Limited
TARC Limited (TARC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TARC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TARC.NS | ₹114.79 | -6.77% | 36.3B | -41.73 | -₹2.95 | N/A |
| DLF.NS | ₹514.75 | -5.07% | 1.3T | 30.19 | ₹17.91 | +1.11% |
| DLF.BO | ₹514.60 | -5.13% | 1.3T | 30.26 | ₹17.87 | +1.11% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹728.40 | -11.10% | 796B | 23.81 | ₹33.47 | +0.53% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹727.90 | -11.01% | 795.9B | 23.80 | ₹33.48 | +0.53% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,412.10 | -2.29% | 526.2B | 23.50 | ₹61.57 | +0.55% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,411.50 | -2.37% | 525.7B | 23.49 | ₹61.56 | +0.55% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,496.85 | -3.52% | 467.5B | 30.10 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,497.20 | -3.54% | 466.7B | 29.47 | ₹52.58 | N/A |
| ANANTRAJ.NS | ₹442.15 | -1.26% | 167.6B | 30.63 | ₹15.21 | +0.16% |
Stock Comparison
TARC.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while DLF.NS trades at ₹514.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while DLF.BO trades at ₹514.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 796B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹728.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 795.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹727.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 526.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,412.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 525.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,411.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 467.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,496.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 466.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,497.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹442.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹443.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 157.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹634.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹635.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 95.49. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,199.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 95.06. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹727.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 3194.38. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹726.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 3181.88. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹324.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹323.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹282.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -58.90. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹340.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 121.35. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹340.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 121.67. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 50.55. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹556.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹556.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹556.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹556.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹370.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹370.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 51.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹287.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹288.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹485.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹166.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -31.54. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹167.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -31.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹292.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while TARC.BO trades at ₹114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -41.45. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,168.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 173.31. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹294.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹294.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹323.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹323.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.31. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹406.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹408.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 234.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹184.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹184.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹513.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹512.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹100.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹101.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹75.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹100.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹68.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹551.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1610.28. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹66.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹985.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹190.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹203.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹617.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹292.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹304.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹244.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹244.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹266.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹158.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹235.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹53.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹53.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹128.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs YAARI.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YAARI.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs YAARI.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, YAARI.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while YAARI.BO trades at ₹20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas YAARI.BO's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YAARI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to YAARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YAARI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs VIPUL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, VIPUL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while VIPUL.BO trades at ₹18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas VIPUL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VIPUL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to VIPUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check VIPUL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison March 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹114.79, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -41.73, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here