IperionX Limited
IperionX Limited TAOFF Peers
See (TAOFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOFF | $3.05 | +0.00% | 973.4M | -20.33 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.34 | +10.37% | 128.6B | 11.31 | $2.24 | +4.89% |
| RTNTF | $70.81 | -0.27% | 101.3B | 10.02 | $7.07 | +3.32% |
| RTPPF | $58.33 | -0.36% | 98.7B | 8.25 | $7.07 | +6.89% |
| GLCNF | $4.20 | +4.22% | 49.7B | -32.13 | -$0.13 | +2.75% |
| GLNCY | $8.33 | +4.52% | 49.6B | -32.03 | -$0.26 | +2.58% |
| GMBXF | $5.98 | -0.75% | 46.6B | 12.46 | $0.48 | +3.11% |
| AAUKF | $29.65 | +2.24% | 40.9B | -10.33 | -$2.87 | +2.45% |
| NGLOY | $15.41 | +3.79% | 33.1B | -10.65 | -$1.44 | +2.18% |
| FSUGY | $21.10 | +4.25% | 32.3B | 8.30 | $2.53 | +8.62% |
Stock Comparison
TAOFF vs BHPLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BHPLF trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs RTNTF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while RTNTF trades at $70.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs RTPPF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while RTPPF trades at $58.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs GLCNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while GLCNF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs GLNCY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while GLNCY trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.03. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs GMBXF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while GMBXF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs AAUKF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AAUKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs NGLOY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NGLOY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs FSUGY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FSUGY trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs FSUMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FSUMF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs CMCLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CMCLF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs TCKRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs IPOAF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while IPOAF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs IVPAF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while IVPAF trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs BOLIF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs BDNNY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BDNNY trades at $65.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs JXMNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and JXMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs SHTLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.70. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs SMMYY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while SMMYY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ABML Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs STMNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs LYSDY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while LYSDY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 137.38. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs LYSCF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while LYSCF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 183.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PUTKF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs PUTKY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PUTKY trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs NILSY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs PAEKY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs FLMMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PILBF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PILBF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -91.88. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs MALRY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MALRY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs CHZQ Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MALRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs NGXXF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NGXXF trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -41.89. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PTNDY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MIMTF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs IIDDY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while IIDDY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs IPGDF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while IPGDF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs DWMNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs NICMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs AZZVF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs SOUHY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while SOUHY trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs AFBOF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs ERMAY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ERMAY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PTNDF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs ERMAF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ERMAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 94.74. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs DETRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while DETRF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ADTLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ADTLF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs BQSSF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BQSSF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -75.75. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ADMLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ADMLF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs AZRMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs LINRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while LINRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -45.38. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs ILKAF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ILKAF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ILKAY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ILKAY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MFRVF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs FMCXF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 949M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FMCXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.25. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ATUSF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 937.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ATUSF trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs STTSY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs ALMTF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 915.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ALMTF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs AUSDF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs AMVMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AMVMF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -66.92. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs AFMJF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs CTJHF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CTJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs NCKAF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NCKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MJDLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 551.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MJDLF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs VULNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 533.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while VULNF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs TTNNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and TTNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs OSTTF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs FGOVF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FGOVF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -91.80. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PXMFF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MCRZF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs MNXMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MNXMF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs CGMLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 447.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CGMLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MCHHF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs BIRNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs VTMXF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while VTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and VTMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs FWEDF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 412.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while FWEDF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs KMRPF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while KMRPF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and KMRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs REEMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while REEMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs NQMIY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MLYF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs CREQF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CREQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs CTJHY Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs RTLGF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while RTLGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs MLXEF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MLXEF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ERLFF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ERLFF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs SLGGF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and SLGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs LTSRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.81. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs PMETF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while PMETF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -60.67. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs SVMLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ARAFF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs BSSMF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs JMXXF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while JMXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MGMNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MGMNF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs EMOTF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 269.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while EMOTF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs ERDCF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while ERDCF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -72.14. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs LRSRF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.
TAOFF vs STQNF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs MMILF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TAOFF vs RXRLF Comparison
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 973.4M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.05, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -20.33, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.