IperionX Limited
IperionX Limited (TAOFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TAOFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOFF | $3.65 | +5.80% | 1.2B | -17.38 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $27.00 | -1.03% | 137B | 12.05 | $2.24 | +4.59% |
| RTNTF | $80.31 | +0.00% | 111.9B | 11.36 | $7.07 | +2.93% |
| RTPPF | $61.88 | +0.36% | 105.7B | 8.75 | $7.07 | +6.50% |
| GLCNF | $4.33 | -0.88% | 51.4B | -33.28 | -$0.13 | +2.64% |
| GLNCY | $8.55 | -1.38% | 50.9B | -32.88 | -$0.26 | +2.51% |
| GMBXF | $6.35 | -0.63% | 49.7B | 13.29 | $0.48 | +2.91% |
| FSUMF | $12.51 | -1.81% | 36.9B | 9.45 | $1.27 | +7.37% |
| FSUGY | $23.93 | -3.12% | 36.8B | 9.47 | $2.53 | +7.58% |
| AAUKF | $31.68 | +3.70% | 34.2B | -11.04 | -$2.87 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
TAOFF vs BHPLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BHPLF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check BHPLF's competition here
TAOFF vs RTNTF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while RTNTF trades at $80.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
TAOFF vs RTPPF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while RTPPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
TAOFF vs GLCNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while GLCNF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -33.28. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check GLCNF's competition here
TAOFF vs GLNCY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while GLNCY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.88. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check GLNCY's competition here
TAOFF vs GMBXF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while GMBXF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check GMBXF's competition here
TAOFF vs FSUMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FSUMF trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FSUMF's competition here
TAOFF vs FSUGY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FSUGY trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FSUGY's competition here
TAOFF vs AAUKF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AAUKF trades at $31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check AAUKF's competition here
TAOFF vs NGLOY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NGLOY trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check NGLOY's competition here
TAOFF vs CMCLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CMCLF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check CMCLF's competition here
TAOFF vs TCKRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while TCKRF trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 695.60. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check TCKRF's competition here
TAOFF vs IVPAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while IVPAF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check IVPAF's competition here
TAOFF vs IPOAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while IPOAF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check IPOAF's competition here
TAOFF vs BOLIF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
TAOFF vs BDNNY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BDNNY trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check BDNNY's competition here
TAOFF vs JXMNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check JXMNF's competition here
TAOFF vs SHTLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
TAOFF vs STMNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while STMNF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 59.83. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check STMNF's competition here
TAOFF vs ABML Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ABML's competition here
TAOFF vs LYSDY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while LYSDY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 178.50. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check LYSDY's competition here
TAOFF vs LYSCF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while LYSCF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 177.13. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check LYSCF's competition here
TAOFF vs SMMYY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SMMYY trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SMMYY's competition here
TAOFF vs PUTKY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PUTKY trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check PUTKY's competition here
TAOFF vs PUTKF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
TAOFF vs NILSY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
TAOFF vs PAEKY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
TAOFF vs MALRY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MALRY trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MALRY's competition here
TAOFF vs PILBF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PILBF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -127.50. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check PILBF's competition here
TAOFF vs MALRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MALRF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MALRF's competition here
TAOFF vs NGXXF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NGXXF trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -49.79. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check NGXXF's competition here
TAOFF vs FLMMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FLMMF's competition here
TAOFF vs IPGDF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while IPGDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
TAOFF vs CHZQ Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
TAOFF vs IIDDY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while IIDDY trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
TAOFF vs NICMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NICMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
TAOFF vs PTNDY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
TAOFF vs MIMTF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MIMTF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
TAOFF vs DWMNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
TAOFF vs AZZVF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
TAOFF vs ERMAY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ERMAY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 110.17. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ERMAY's competition here
TAOFF vs AFBOF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
TAOFF vs ERMAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAF's competition here
TAOFF vs SOUHY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SOUHY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SOUHY's competition here
TAOFF vs PTNDF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check PTNDF's competition here
TAOFF vs LINRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while LINRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -63.28. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LINRF's competition here
TAOFF vs ILKAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ILKAF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ILKAF's competition here
TAOFF vs DETRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check DETRF's competition here
TAOFF vs ILKAY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ILKAY trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ILKAY's competition here
TAOFF vs ADTLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTLF's competition here
TAOFF vs ADMLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ADMLF trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ADMLF's competition here
TAOFF vs AZRMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
TAOFF vs FMCXF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FMCXF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -48.25. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FMCXF's competition here
TAOFF vs MFRVF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MFRVF's competition here
TAOFF vs BQSSF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 991.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BQSSF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -59.75. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check BQSSF's competition here
TAOFF vs AMVMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 989.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AMVMF trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -80.66. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check AMVMF's competition here
TAOFF vs ATUSF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 975M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ATUSF trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ATUSF's competition here
TAOFF vs STTSY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check STTSY's competition here
TAOFF vs AFMJF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 905.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check AFMJF's competition here
TAOFF vs ALMTF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ALMTF's competition here
TAOFF vs AUSDF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
TAOFF vs CREQF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 781.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CREQF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check CREQF's competition here
TAOFF vs VULNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 656.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while VULNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
TAOFF vs CTJHF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and CTJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHF's competition here
TAOFF vs FGOVF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 573.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FGOVF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -108.40. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FGOVF's competition here
TAOFF vs REEMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 557.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while REEMF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check REEMF's competition here
TAOFF vs MJDLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 556M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MJDLF trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MJDLF's competition here
TAOFF vs NCKAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check NCKAF's competition here
TAOFF vs PMETF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PMETF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -105.73. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check PMETF's competition here
TAOFF vs MNXMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MNXMF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -75.96. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MNXMF's competition here
TAOFF vs TTNNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check TTNNF's competition here
TAOFF vs PTTMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and PTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTMF's competition here
TAOFF vs OSTTF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check OSTTF's competition here
TAOFF vs CGMLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CGMLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check CGMLF's competition here
TAOFF vs MCRZF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MCRZF's competition here
TAOFF vs PXMFF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 462.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check PXMFF's competition here
TAOFF vs BIRNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check BIRNF's competition here
TAOFF vs MCHHF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
TAOFF vs KMRPF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check KMRPF's competition here
TAOFF vs NQMIY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
TAOFF vs MLYF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MLYF's competition here
TAOFF vs FWEDF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 373.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while FWEDF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check FWEDF's competition here
TAOFF vs ERLFF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ERLFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -34.95. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ERLFF's competition here
TAOFF vs MLXEF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 355.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MLXEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MLXEF's competition here
TAOFF vs CTJHY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check CTJHY's competition here
TAOFF vs SLGGF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SLGGF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SLGGF's competition here
TAOFF vs RTLGF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while RTLGF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check RTLGF's competition here
TAOFF vs ARAFF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ARAFF's competition here
TAOFF vs LTSRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check LTSRF's competition here
TAOFF vs SVMLF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SVMLF's competition here
TAOFF vs BSSMF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
TAOFF vs SRHYY Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 288.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SRHYY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SRHYY's competition here
TAOFF vs MGMNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while MGMNF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check MGMNF's competition here
TAOFF vs SYAAF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while SYAAF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check SYAAF's competition here
TAOFF vs LRSRF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check LRSRF's competition here
TAOFF vs ERDCF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while ERDCF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -70.03. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check ERDCF's competition here
TAOFF vs NTCPF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 255.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while NTCPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -32.96. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check NTCPF's competition here
TAOFF vs EMOTF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while EMOTF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -24.13. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAOFF.Check EMOTF's competition here
TAOFF vs STQNF Comparison July 2025
TAOFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAOFF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAOFF is priced at $3.65, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAOFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.38, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, TAOFF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAOFF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here