TransAct Technologies Incorporated
TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TACT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TACT | $3.64 | +0.55% | 36.2M | -4.42 | -$0.81 | N/A |
| ANET | $127.49 | -7.10% | 167.3B | 48.31 | $2.75 | N/A |
| WDC | $282.57 | -0.74% | 96.8B | 27.01 | $10.57 | +0.11% |
| STX | $415.77 | +1.66% | 89.7B | 46.40 | $8.86 | +0.70% |
| DELL | $120.41 | +1.13% | 81.9B | 16.02 | $7.63 | +1.72% |
| PSTG | $69.85 | -5.08% | 24.4B | 194.53 | $0.38 | N/A |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| NTAP | $100.93 | -0.66% | 20.5B | 17.85 | $5.74 | +2.03% |
| SMCI | $31.54 | -1.93% | 19.4B | 23.66 | $1.37 | N/A |
| HPQ | $18.41 | +0.38% | 17.4B | 7.02 | $2.65 | +6.35% |
Stock Comparison
TACT vs ANET Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while ANET trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check ANET's competition here
TACT vs WDC Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while WDC trades at $282.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check WDC's competition here
TACT vs STX Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while STX trades at $415.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check STX's competition here
TACT vs DELL Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while DELL trades at $120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check DELL's competition here
TACT vs PSTG Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while PSTG trades at $69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 194.53. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check PSTG's competition here
TACT vs CAJ Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check CAJ's competition here
TACT vs NTAP Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while NTAP trades at $100.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check NTAP's competition here
TACT vs SMCI Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while SMCI trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check SMCI's competition here
TACT vs HPQ Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while HPQ trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check HPQ's competition here
TACT vs LOGI Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while LOGI trades at $89.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check LOGI's competition here
TACT vs IONQ Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while IONQ trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check IONQ's competition here
TACT vs IONQ-WT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while IONQ-WT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
TACT vs QBTS-WT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
TACT vs SNDKV Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check SNDKV's competition here
TACT vs QBTS Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while QBTS trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check QBTS's competition here
TACT vs RGTI Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while RGTI trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check RGTI's competition here
TACT vs RGTIW Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while RGTIW trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check RGTIW's competition here
TACT vs RCAT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while RCAT trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -24.45. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check RCAT's competition here
TACT vs QUBT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while QUBT trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check QUBT's competition here
TACT vs MKFG-WT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
TACT vs CRCT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 978.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while CRCT trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check CRCT's competition here
TACT vs SSYS Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 892.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while SSYS trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check SSYS's competition here
TACT vs CRSR Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 599M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while CRSR trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -46.83. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check CRSR's competition here
TACT vs NNDM Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while NNDM trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check NNDM's competition here
TACT vs BGIN Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while BGIN trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check BGIN's competition here
TACT vs DDD Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while DDD trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check DDD's competition here
TACT vs OSS Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while OSS trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check OSS's competition here
TACT vs CAN Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while CAN trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check CAN's competition here
TACT vs VELO Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while VELO trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VELO's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check VELO's competition here
TACT vs TIO Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check TIO's competition here
TACT vs DM Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check DM's competition here
TACT vs VTIX Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while VTIX trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check VTIX's competition here
TACT vs AMCI Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while AMCI trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -592.00. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check AMCI's competition here
TACT vs MICT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check MICT's competition here
TACT vs MKFG Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check MKFG's competition here
TACT vs INVE Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while INVE trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check INVE's competition here
TACT vs ALOT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while ALOT trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check ALOT's competition here
TACT vs YIBO Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while YIBO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check YIBO's competition here
TACT vs UAVS Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while UAVS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check UAVS's competition here
TACT vs KTCC Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while KTCC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check KTCC's competition here
TACT vs FATH Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check FATH's competition here
TACT vs QMCO Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while QMCO trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check QMCO's competition here
TACT vs EBON Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while EBON trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check EBON's competition here
TACT vs SGE Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check SGE's competition here
TACT vs VLD Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VLD's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check VLD's competition here
TACT vs SCKT Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while SCKT trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check SCKT's competition here
TACT vs ZSPC Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while ZSPC trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check ZSPC's competition here
TACT vs VJET Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check VJET's competition here
TACT vs STRCW Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check STRCW's competition here
TACT vs HILL Comparison February 2026
TACT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TACT stands at 36.2M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TACT is priced at $3.64, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TACT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TACT's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TACT is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TACT.Check HILL's competition here