Stran & Company, Inc.
Stran & Company, Inc. SWAGW Peers
See (SWAGW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWAGW | $0.02 | +10.11% | 385.1K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OMC | $71.41 | +1.69% | 13.9B | 9.76 | $7.32 | +3.93% |
| IPG | $23.05 | +1.72% | 8.5B | 17.73 | $1.30 | +5.74% |
| WPP | $37.77 | -4.17% | 8.2B | 11.31 | $3.34 | +7.89% |
| MGNI | $17.60 | +0.80% | 2.5B | 80.00 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| ZD | $33.30 | +1.49% | 1.4B | 18.92 | $1.76 | N/A |
| CRTO | $26.10 | -0.68% | 1.4B | 10.70 | $2.44 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.22 | -0.24% | 1.4B | 28.34 | $0.29 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.49 | +4.66% | 1.2B | -449.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SWAGW vs OMC Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while OMC trades at $71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs IPG Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while IPG trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs WPP Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while WPP trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MGNI Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MGNI trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MDCA Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ZD Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ZD trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CRTO Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CRTO trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs IAS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while IAS trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs STGW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while STGW trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -449.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CMPR Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CMPR trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs EEX Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 932.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while EEX trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 469.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs QNST Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 914.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while QNST trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1606.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs BOMN Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs DLX Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 665.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while DLX trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CCO Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CCO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs NCMI Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 489.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while NCMI trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -27.32. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CTV Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs BOC Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while BOC trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 470.83. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ADV Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 421.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ADV trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs QUOT Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs TRMR Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs NEXN Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while NEXN trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ADTH Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs SDM Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while SDM trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 119.83. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs TZOO Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TZOO trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs EDHL Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while EDHL trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 445.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs TSQ Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TSQ trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CDLX Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CDLX trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ATY Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MCTR Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MCTR trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 288.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MCHX Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MCHX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ICLK Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs STCN Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs XNET Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while XNET trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -117.60. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs INUV Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while INUV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ABLV Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ABLV trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ADTHW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs GSMG Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs FLNT Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while FLNT trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ACCS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ACCS trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MOXC Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MOBQ Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MOBQ trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs HHS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while HHS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs WIMI Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while WIMI trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs HAO Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while HAO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs SWAG Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while SWAG trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MOBQW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW and MOBQW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWAGW vs STRN Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs QMMM Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while QMMM trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CHR Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CHR trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs TNMG Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TNMG trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs STFS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while STFS trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ISIG Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs DRCT Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while DRCT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs VSME Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while VSME trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs LDWY Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while LDWY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs DMS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs DRCTW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs BAOS Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while BAOS trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs MGOL Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ADVWW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs CNET Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while CNET trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs STRNW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ABLVW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 865K. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW and ABLVW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWAGW vs TRKAW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs SRAX Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 294.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs GSMGW Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs TRKA Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs ZDVSV Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAGW.
SWAGW vs DMS-WT Comparison
SWAGW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAGW stands at 385.1K. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWAGW is priced at $0.02, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAGW's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAGW and DMS-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).