Subros Limited

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹129.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹129.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹35,021.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹35,015.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 876B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,756.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 81.03. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 875.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,758.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 77.40. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 690.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,190.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 689.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,190.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 618.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MRF.BO trades at ₹145,727.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 618.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MRF.NS trades at ₹145,605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 617.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹3,838.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 58.04. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 617.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹3,844.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 58.01. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 491.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,488.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 82.21. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 485B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,534.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 485B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,525.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 359.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,437.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 359.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,448.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 333.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹528.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 54.48. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹528.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 295.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹42.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 295.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹15,257.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 59.47. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 295.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹15,267.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 59.49. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 294.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹42.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 47.31. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 293.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹14,467.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 293.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹14,483.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 288.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹462.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 288B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹462.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 287.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹333.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 287.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹333.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 243B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹932.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 78.60. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹933.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 78.41. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 194.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹912.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹914.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 191.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,050.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 190.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,046.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 56.97. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹458.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹459.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹183.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹183.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 153.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹13,681.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 43.03. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 153.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹13,694.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹557.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹557.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 152.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,804.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,806.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹950.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹950.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹572.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹572.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹2,955.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹570.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 177.36. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹571.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 175.06. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,665.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.57. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,663.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹649.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹649.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹435.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, OLECTRA.NS has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while OLECTRA.NS trades at ₹1,011.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas OLECTRA.NS's P/E ratio is 59.84. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OLECTRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to OLECTRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check OLECTRA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹434.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹556.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹555.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹601.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹602.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,227.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹9,894.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 190.82. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹9,901.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 191.02. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,859.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,864.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,249.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,249.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,841.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,843.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹415.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹414.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹6,005.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹6,001.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.32. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹943.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹943.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹142.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹142.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹798.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,593.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,592.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹137.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹136.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹218.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹218.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹4,125.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 69.68. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹4,112.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹2,013.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹2,004.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹538.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹488.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹489.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹279.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹279.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here

SUBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUBROS.NS stands at 52.6B. In comparison, DIVGIITTS.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUBROS.NS is priced at ₹801.00, while DIVGIITTS.NS trades at ₹745.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.35, whereas DIVGIITTS.NS's P/E ratio is 77.18. In terms of profitability, SUBROS.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIVGIITTS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DIVGIITTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUBROS.NS.Check DIVGIITTS.NS's competition here