SSR Mining Inc.
SSR Mining Inc. SSRM.TO Peers
See (SSRM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSRM.TO | $15.02 | -1.70% | 3.05B | 26.35 | $0.57 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $70.00 | +0.60% | 77.91B | 11.40 | $6.14 | +1.99% |
| AEM.TO | $148.81 | +0.07% | 75.23B | 22.75 | $6.54 | +1.50% |
| WPM.TO | $109.77 | -0.19% | 49.80B | 57.77 | $1.90 | +0.80% |
| FNV.TO | $222.68 | +0.29% | 42.88B | 48.41 | $4.60 | +0.92% |
| ABX.TO | $24.94 | -0.44% | 42.88B | 13.55 | $1.84 | +2.22% |
| K.TO | $19.19 | -0.05% | 23.61B | 14.01 | $1.37 | +0.87% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $34.28 | +0.03% | 14.42B | 38.52 | $0.89 | +0.41% |
| LUG.TO | $56.61 | +0.30% | 13.61B | 17.86 | $3.17 | +1.98% |
Stock Comparison
SSRM.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 77.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NGT.TO trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 75.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AEM.TO trades at $148.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 49.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while WPM.TO trades at $109.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 57.77. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 42.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while FNV.TO trades at $222.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 42.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ABX.TO trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs K.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while K.TO trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AGI.TO trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 13.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while LUG.TO trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while EDV.TO trades at $38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -65.12. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while OR.TO trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 135.96. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while BTO.TO trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ELD.TO trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while IMG.TO trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NGD.TO trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while OLA.TO trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while PRU.TO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while OGC.TO trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while EQX.TO trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while TXG.TO trades at $41.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SSL.TO trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 81.93. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while DPM.TO trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while KNT.TO trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while WDO.TO trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CXB.TO trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while WGX.TO trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NG.TO trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.15. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CG.TO trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ORA.TO trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SEA.TO trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -106.07. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CNL.TO trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -29.38. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while RUP.TO trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -158.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 735.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 698.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while MSA.TO trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 541.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ORE.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 531.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ASE.CN trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 462.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GAU.TO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 447.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while MND.TO trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 407.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while PRB.TO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 376.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while FDR.V trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 314.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while IAU.TO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 246.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while JAG.TO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 231.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SBI.TO trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 214.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while STGO.TO trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 207.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 195.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while DNG.TO trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 191.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ITH.TO trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 168.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 156.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while FF.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 139.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while LN.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 129.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while LGD.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 116.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SANU.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 113.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GHRT.V trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 104.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NEXG.V trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 104.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while STLR.TO trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 98.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs G.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 97.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while G.TO trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while XTG.TO trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 93.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CBR.V trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 87.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ELO.TO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 66.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CCM.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 65.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 63.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CGC.V trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 61.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while HMR.V trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 47.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while VEIN.V trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 43.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while USGD.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 37.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NVO.TO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 34.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while ESM.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AMM.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 27.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 21.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while VAU.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 17.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while PME.TO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 16.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while NOM.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 15.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while HWG.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.
SSRM.TO vs WG.CN Comparison
SSRM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM.TO stands at 3.05B. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM.TO is priced at $15.02, while WG.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM.TO is less volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.TO.