Block, Inc.
Block, Inc. SQ3.F Peers
See (SQ3.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQ3.F | €54.92 | +2.06% | 34.4B | 15.34 | €3.58 | N/A |
| MSF.DE | €416.70 | +0.79% | 3.1T | 37.04 | €11.25 | +0.63% |
| MSF.F | €415.90 | +0.75% | 3.1T | 36.94 | €11.26 | +0.63% |
| ORC.DE | €181.32 | +0.19% | 508.5B | 48.48 | €3.74 | +0.74% |
| PTX.F | €120.00 | N/A | 271.5B | 600.00 | €0.20 | N/A |
| ADB.DE | €327.45 | +0.61% | 139.6B | 24.31 | €13.47 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €220.40 | +0.82% | 20.7B | 36.31 | €6.07 | +0.30% |
| AK3.DE | €95.28 | -1.95% | 14.4B | 31.55 | €3.02 | N/A |
| PMTA.DE | €119.34 | N/A | 14B | 28.21 | €4.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SQ3.F vs MSF.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while MSF.DE trades at €416.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs MSF.F Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MSF.F has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while MSF.F trades at €415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas MSF.F's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSF.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to MSF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs ORC.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 508.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while ORC.DE trades at €181.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 48.48. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs PTX.F Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, PTX.F has a market cap of 271.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while PTX.F trades at €120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas PTX.F's P/E ratio is 600.00. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTX.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to PTX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs ADB.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ADB.DE has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while ADB.DE trades at €327.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas ADB.DE's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADB.DE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to ADB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs BZF1.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to BZF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs VRS.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while VRS.DE trades at €220.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs AK3.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while AK3.DE trades at €95.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs PMTA.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, PMTA.DE has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while PMTA.DE trades at €119.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas PMTA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMTA.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to PMTA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs KKS.F Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KKS.F has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while KKS.F trades at €68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas KKS.F's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KKS.F's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to KKS.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs IOS.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, IOS.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while IOS.DE trades at €40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas IOS.DE's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IOS.DE's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to IOS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs 3L7A.F Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 3L7A.F has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while 3L7A.F trades at €116.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas 3L7A.F's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3L7A.F's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to 3L7A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs SOW.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs SUSE.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs YSN.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while YSN.DE trades at €205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs NFN.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while NFN.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 315.00. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs EXL.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, EXL.DE has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while EXL.DE trades at €2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas EXL.DE's P/E ratio is 291.00. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to EXL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs CYR.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while CYR.DE trades at €2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs R1B.F Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, R1B.F has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while R1B.F trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas R1B.F's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to R1B.F's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to R1B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs ABT.DU Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ABT.DU has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while ABT.DU trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas ABT.DU's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABT.DU's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is more volatile compared to ABT.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs UMDK.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs O5H.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs INW1.DE Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.
SQ3.F vs 50C.MU Comparison
SQ3.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQ3.F stands at 34.4B. In comparison, 50C.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQ3.F is priced at €54.92, while 50C.MU trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQ3.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.34, whereas 50C.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQ3.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 50C.MU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQ3.F is less volatile compared to 50C.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQ3.F.