Advanced Bitcoin Technologies AG
Advanced Bitcoin Technologies AG (ABT.DU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABT.DU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABT.DU | €0.20 | +2.00% | 4.2M | -20.40 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| MSF.F | €362.95 | +3.14% | 2.7T | 25.58 | €14.32 | +0.81% |
| MSF.DE | €363.30 | +3.24% | 2.7T | 25.42 | €14.29 | +0.82% |
| ORC.DE | €166.86 | -2.10% | 479.9B | 35.20 | €4.74 | +1.03% |
| PTX.F | €116.40 | +1.39% | 267.3B | 153.16 | €0.76 | N/A |
| SYP.DE | €425.50 | -2.74% | 81.5B | 76.67 | €5.55 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| SQ3.F | €60.40 | -1.23% | 36.2B | 55.78 | €1.09 | N/A |
| 1N8.DE | €888.90 | -1.21% | 28B | 26.42 | €33.65 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €255.95 | +1.99% | 23.3B | 34.22 | €7.48 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
ABT.DU vs MSF.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MSF.F has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while MSF.F trades at €362.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas MSF.F's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSF.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to MSF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check MSF.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs MSF.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while MSF.DE trades at €363.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check MSF.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs ORC.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 479.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while ORC.DE trades at €166.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check ORC.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs PTX.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PTX.F has a market cap of 267.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while PTX.F trades at €116.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas PTX.F's P/E ratio is 153.16. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to PTX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check PTX.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs SYP.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SYP.DE has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while SYP.DE trades at €425.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas SYP.DE's P/E ratio is 76.67. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYP.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to SYP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SYP.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs BZF1.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to BZF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check BZF1.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs SQ3.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SQ3.F has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while SQ3.F trades at €60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas SQ3.F's P/E ratio is 55.78. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SQ3.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to SQ3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SQ3.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs 1N8.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, 1N8.DE has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while 1N8.DE trades at €888.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas 1N8.DE's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1N8.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to 1N8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check 1N8.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs VRS.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while VRS.DE trades at €255.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check VRS.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs FFV.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check FFV.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs AK3.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while AK3.DE trades at €95.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check AK3.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs KKS.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, KKS.F has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while KKS.F trades at €74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas KKS.F's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KKS.F's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to KKS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check KKS.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs IOS.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, IOS.DE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while IOS.DE trades at €28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas IOS.DE's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IOS.DE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to IOS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check IOS.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs SOW.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SOW.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs 3L7A.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, 3L7A.F has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while 3L7A.F trades at €77.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas 3L7A.F's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3L7A.F's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to 3L7A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check 3L7A.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs SUSE.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check SUSE.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs YSN.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while YSN.DE trades at €191.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check YSN.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs NFN.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while NFN.DE trades at €3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 81.25. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check NFN.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs CYR.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while CYR.DE trades at €2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check CYR.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs R1B.F Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, R1B.F has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while R1B.F trades at €4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas R1B.F's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to R1B.F's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to R1B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check R1B.F's competition here
ABT.DU vs INW.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, INW.DE has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while INW.DE trades at €3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas INW.DE's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INW.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is more volatile compared to INW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check INW.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs UMDK.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check UMDK.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs O5H.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check O5H.DE's competition here
ABT.DU vs 50C.MU Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, 50C.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while 50C.MU trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas 50C.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 50C.MU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to 50C.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check 50C.MU's competition here
ABT.DU vs INW1.DE Comparison May 2026
ABT.DU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABT.DU stands at 4.2M. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABT.DU is priced at €0.20, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABT.DU currently has a P/E ratio of -20.40, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, ABT.DU's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABT.DU is less volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABT.DU.Check INW1.DE's competition here