BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 50C.MU's competitors and their performance on the MUN and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 50C.MU and its MUN peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50C.MU | €0.18 | -90.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSF.DE | €414.70 | +0.80% | 3.1T | 30.65 | €13.53 | +0.75% |
| ORC.DE | €125.80 | +3.57% | 362.4B | 24.01 | €5.24 | +1.36% |
| SYP.DE | €340.50 | -0.15% | 65.2B | 36.18 | €9.41 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| 1N8.DE | €1,071.00 | +0.83% | 33.8B | 30.10 | €35.58 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €240.90 | +1.47% | 21.7B | 31.05 | €7.74 | +1.14% |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
| AK3.DE | €110.42 | +13.64% | 14.4B | 31.55 | €3.02 | N/A |
| SOW.DE | €37.10 | +0.27% | 2.7B | 161.30 | €0.23 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (XETRA: MSF.DE)
50C.MU vs MSF.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while MSF.DE trades at €414.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check MSF.DE's competition here
Oracle Corporation (XETRA: ORC.DE)
50C.MU vs ORC.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 362.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while ORC.DE trades at €125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check ORC.DE's competition here
Synopsys, Inc. (XETRA: SYP.DE)
50C.MU vs SYP.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SYP.DE has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while SYP.DE trades at €340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYP.DE's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SYP.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SYP.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SYP.DE's competition here
VMware, Inc. (XETRA: BZF1.DE)
50C.MU vs BZF1.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to BZF1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check BZF1.DE's competition here
Adyen N.V. (XETRA: 1N8.DE)
50C.MU vs 1N8.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, 1N8.DE has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while 1N8.DE trades at €1,071.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1N8.DE's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to 1N8.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to 1N8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check 1N8.DE's competition here
VeriSign, Inc. (XETRA: VRS.DE)
50C.MU vs VRS.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while VRS.DE trades at €240.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check VRS.DE's competition here
F5, Inc. (XETRA: FFV.DE)
50C.MU vs FFV.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check FFV.DE's competition here
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (XETRA: AK3.DE)
50C.MU vs AK3.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while AK3.DE trades at €110.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check AK3.DE's competition here
Software AG (XETRA: SOW.DE)
50C.MU vs SOW.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SOW.DE's competition here
SUSE S.a. (XETRA: SUSE.DE)
50C.MU vs SUSE.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check SUSE.DE's competition here
secunet Security Networks AG (XETRA: YSN.DE)
50C.MU vs YSN.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while YSN.DE trades at €181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check YSN.DE's competition here
NFON AG (XETRA: NFN.DE)
50C.MU vs NFN.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while NFN.DE trades at €3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check NFN.DE's competition here
cyan AG (XETRA: CYR.DE)
50C.MU vs CYR.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while CYR.DE trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check CYR.DE's competition here
GBS Software AG (XETRA: INW.DE)
50C.MU vs INW.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, INW.DE has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while INW.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INW.DE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to INW.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to INW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check INW.DE's competition here
Advanced Bitcoin Technologies AG (DUS: ABT.DU)
50C.MU vs ABT.DU Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, ABT.DU has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while ABT.DU trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABT.DU's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to ABT.DU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to ABT.DU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check ABT.DU's competition here
UMT United Mobility Technology AG (XETRA: UMDK.DE)
50C.MU vs UMDK.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check UMDK.DE's competition here
OpenLimit Holding AG (XETRA: O5H.DE)
50C.MU vs O5H.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check O5H.DE's competition here
GBS Software AG (XETRA: INW1.DE)
50C.MU vs INW1.DE Comparison August 2026
BIT Mining Limited (MUN: 50C.MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the MUN reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 50C.MU stands at 0. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 50C.MU is priced at €0.18 on the MUN, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
50C.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, 50C.MU's ROE is N/A, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 50C.MU is more volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 50C.MU.Check INW1.DE's competition here