Qualys, Inc.
Qualys, Inc. (3L7A.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3L7A.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3L7A.F | €84.49 | +9.09% | 2.9B | 17.57 | €4.75 | N/A |
| MSF.F | €364.35 | +0.29% | 2.7T | 25.28 | €14.34 | +0.82% |
| MSF.DE | €364.35 | +0.29% | 2.7T | 25.11 | €14.31 | +0.83% |
| ORC.DE | €160.06 | -4.08% | 460B | 33.60 | €4.76 | +1.07% |
| PTX.F | €115.98 | -0.36% | 263B | 150.74 | €0.76 | N/A |
| SYP.DE | €421.50 | -0.94% | 80.7B | 75.67 | €5.57 | N/A |
| BZF1.DE | €139.80 | -1.55% | 60.4B | 45.99 | €3.04 | N/A |
| SQ3.F | €60.35 | -0.74% | 36.1B | 55.69 | €1.09 | N/A |
| 1N8.DE | €930.20 | +4.65% | 28.9B | 27.24 | €33.60 | N/A |
| VRS.DE | €259.50 | +1.39% | 24B | 35.18 | €7.48 | +1.02% |
Stock Comparison
3L7A.F vs MSF.F Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSF.F has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while MSF.F trades at €364.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas MSF.F's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MSF.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to MSF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check MSF.F's competition here
3L7A.F vs MSF.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSF.DE has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while MSF.DE trades at €364.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas MSF.DE's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MSF.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to MSF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check MSF.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs ORC.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORC.DE has a market cap of 460B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while ORC.DE trades at €160.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ORC.DE's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ORC.DE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to ORC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check ORC.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs PTX.F Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PTX.F has a market cap of 263B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while PTX.F trades at €115.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas PTX.F's P/E ratio is 150.74. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PTX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to PTX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check PTX.F's competition here
3L7A.F vs SYP.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYP.DE has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while SYP.DE trades at €421.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SYP.DE's P/E ratio is 75.67. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SYP.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to SYP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check SYP.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs BZF1.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BZF1.DE has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while BZF1.DE trades at €139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas BZF1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BZF1.DE's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to BZF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check BZF1.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs SQ3.F Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQ3.F has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while SQ3.F trades at €60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SQ3.F's P/E ratio is 55.69. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SQ3.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to SQ3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check SQ3.F's competition here
3L7A.F vs 1N8.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 1N8.DE has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while 1N8.DE trades at €930.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas 1N8.DE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to 1N8.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to 1N8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check 1N8.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs VRS.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VRS.DE has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while VRS.DE trades at €259.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas VRS.DE's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRS.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to VRS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check VRS.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs FFV.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check FFV.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs KKS.F Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KKS.F has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while KKS.F trades at €75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas KKS.F's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KKS.F's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to KKS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check KKS.F's competition here
3L7A.F vs AK3.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AK3.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while AK3.DE trades at €95.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas AK3.DE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AK3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to AK3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check AK3.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs IOS.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IOS.DE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while IOS.DE trades at €29.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas IOS.DE's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IOS.DE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to IOS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check IOS.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs SOW.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOW.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while SOW.DE trades at €37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SOW.DE's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SOW.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to SOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check SOW.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs SUSE.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUSE.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while SUSE.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas SUSE.DE's P/E ratio is -57.32. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUSE.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to SUSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check SUSE.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs YSN.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YSN.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while YSN.DE trades at €200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas YSN.DE's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to YSN.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to YSN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check YSN.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs NFN.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NFN.DE has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while NFN.DE trades at €3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas NFN.DE's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NFN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to NFN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check NFN.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs CYR.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CYR.DE has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while CYR.DE trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas CYR.DE's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYR.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to CYR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check CYR.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs R1B.F Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, R1B.F has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while R1B.F trades at €4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas R1B.F's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to R1B.F's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to R1B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check R1B.F's competition here
3L7A.F vs INW.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INW.DE has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while INW.DE trades at €3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas INW.DE's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INW.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to INW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check INW.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs ABT.DU Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABT.DU has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while ABT.DU trades at €0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas ABT.DU's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ABT.DU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is more volatile compared to ABT.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check ABT.DU's competition here
3L7A.F vs UMDK.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UMDK.DE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while UMDK.DE trades at €0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas UMDK.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UMDK.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to UMDK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check UMDK.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs O5H.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, O5H.DE has a market cap of 400.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while O5H.DE trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas O5H.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to O5H.DE's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to O5H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check O5H.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs INW1.DE Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while INW1.DE trades at €2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas INW1.DE's P/E ratio is -61.94. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INW1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to INW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check INW1.DE's competition here
3L7A.F vs 50C.MU Comparison May 2026
3L7A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3L7A.F stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 50C.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3L7A.F is priced at €84.49, while 50C.MU trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3L7A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 17.57, whereas 50C.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3L7A.F's ROE is +0.37%, compared to 50C.MU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3L7A.F is less volatile compared to 50C.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3L7A.F.Check 50C.MU's competition here