South32 Limited
South32 Limited SOUHY Peers
See (SOUHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOUHY | $9.19 | +2.74% | 1.65B | -35.33 | -$0.26 | +3.39% |
| BHPLF | $25.36 | +0.69% | 128.69B | 11.32 | $2.24 | +4.89% |
| RTNTF | $74.00 | -3.10% | 102.59B | 10.47 | $7.07 | +3.18% |
| RTPPF | $57.54 | -3.13% | 98.96B | 8.14 | $7.07 | +6.99% |
| GLCNF | $3.53 | +4.75% | 42.42B | -27.15 | -$0.13 | +3.26% |
| GLNCY | $7.00 | +4.98% | 42.07B | -26.93 | -$0.26 | +3.07% |
| GMBXF | $5.35 | +2.29% | 41.65B | 11.63 | $0.46 | +2.41% |
| NGLOY | $14.26 | +4.39% | 34.61B | -11.32 | -$1.26 | +2.26% |
| AAUKF | $28.02 | +1.52% | 34.00B | -11.08 | -$2.53 | +2.27% |
| FSUMF | $10.80 | +3.35% | 33.20B | 8.57 | $1.26 | +8.19% |
Stock Comparison
SOUHY vs BHPLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BHPLF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs RTNTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 102.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while RTNTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs RTPPF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs GLCNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while GLCNF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs GLNCY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while GLNCY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs GMBXF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs NGLOY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while NGLOY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AAUKF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FSUMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FSUMF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FSUGY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FSUGY trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CMCLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CMCLF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs TCKRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs IVPAF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while IVPAF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs SHTLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs BOLIF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs BDNNY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BDNNY trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs JXMNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs IPOAF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ABML Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs SMMYY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while SMMYY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs STMNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PUTKF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PUTKY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PUTKY trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs NILSY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LYSDY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LYSDY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LYSCF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LYSCF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PAEKY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PILBF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PILBF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FLMMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MALRY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MALRY trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CHZQ Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MIMTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs IPGDF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AZZVF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MALRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs DWMNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs IIDDY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs NGXXF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while NGXXF trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.58. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ERMAY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ERMAF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AFBOF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PTNDY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs NICMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PTNDF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs DETRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while DETRF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ILKAY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ILKAY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AZRMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LINRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FMCXF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FMCXF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ILKAF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ILKAF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs BQSSF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BQSSF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.75. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs STTSY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ADTLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AUSDF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ATUSF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 875.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ATUSF trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs JMXXF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AFMJF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 818.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ADMLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 818.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ADMLF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AMVMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 703.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AMVMF trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs VULNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 639.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while VULNF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MFRVF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CTJHF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PXMFF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 560.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs TAOFF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs TTNNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs OSTTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MJDLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 480.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MJDLF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ALMTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 469.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ALMTF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MCRZF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs BIRNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs NQMIY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs REEMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 374.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FGOVF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 369.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MCHHF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CTJHY Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ERLFF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 346.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ERLFF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs KMRPF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MNXMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 334.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MNXMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.20. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MLYF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ARAFF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 317.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs MLXEF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while MLXEF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs AUMTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs SLGGF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs SVMLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 284.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while SVMLF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CGMLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LTSRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 281.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs FWEDF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 262.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while FWEDF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LRSRF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PMETF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 259.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PMETF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs STQNF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs RXRLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs LTHHF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs BSRUF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs EMOTF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 234.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while EMOTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs PTTMF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs ERDCF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 232.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -64.15. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs CILLF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs SYAAF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 229.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while SYAAF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.
SOUHY vs GSCCF Comparison
SOUHY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOUHY stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GSCCF has a market cap of 220.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SOUHY is priced at $9.19, while GSCCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOUHY currently has a P/E ratio of -35.33, whereas GSCCF's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, SOUHY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOUHY is less volatile compared to GSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOUHY.