Sonder Holdings Inc.
Sonder Holdings Inc. SONDW Peers
See (SONDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SONDW | $0.01 | +1.20% | 23.7M | N/A | -$38.48 | N/A |
MAR | $265.63 | +2.24% | 72.8B | 30.25 | $8.78 | +0.96% |
HLT | $252.73 | +1.71% | 60.1B | 39.86 | $6.34 | +0.24% |
IHG | $116.56 | +0.90% | 18B | 30.20 | $3.86 | +1.44% |
H | $132.74 | +2.14% | 12.7B | 16.80 | $7.90 | +0.45% |
WH | $83.48 | +2.23% | 6.4B | 19.88 | $4.20 | +1.86% |
CHH | $128.71 | +2.31% | 6B | 19.74 | $6.52 | +0.89% |
ATAT | $31.03 | -0.74% | 4.3B | 24.63 | $1.26 | +0.58% |
MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
SHCO | $6.26 | -2.19% | 1.2B | -10.61 | -$0.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONDW vs MAR Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while MAR trades at $265.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs HLT Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while HLT trades at $252.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs IHG Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while IHG trades at $116.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs H Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while H trades at $132.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to H's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs WH Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while WH trades at $83.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs CHH Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while CHH trades at $128.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to CHH's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs ATAT Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while ATAT trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs MCG Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs SHCO Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while SHCO trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs HTHT Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while HTHT trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs GHG Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while GHG trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs INTG Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while INTG trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs SOND Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while SOND trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs LUXHP Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while LUXHP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs LUXH Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 213.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while LUXH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.
SONDW vs STAY Comparison
SONDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONDW stands at 23.7M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SONDW is priced at $0.01, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONDW's ROE is +0.69%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONDW is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONDW.