Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹131.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 41.12. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹131.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹35,381.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹35,330.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 909.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,858.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 80.59. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 908.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,858.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 84.06. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 702.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,177.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 61.72. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 702.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,179.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 666.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,082.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 666.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,084.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 62.51. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 626.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MRF.BO trades at ₹143,846.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 625.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MRF.NS trades at ₹143,950.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 506.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,562.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 85.11. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 486.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,518.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 486.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,516.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 376.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,685.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 376.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,682.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 336.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹529.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 54.99. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 306.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹14,310.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 306.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹14,325.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 294.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹15,799.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 294.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹454.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 293.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹15,793.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 59.13. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 293.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹454.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 288.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 46.35. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 288.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 287B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹335.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 286.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹335.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 237.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹934.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 76.82. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 237.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹933.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 76.72. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 191.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹923.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 191.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹921.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 189.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹494.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 188.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹495.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹7,876.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹7,869.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.64. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹183.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹183.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹534.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹534.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹13,231.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹13,266.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,723.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,726.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹965.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹965.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,183.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹573.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹573.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹556.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 171.79. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹556.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 174.44. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,672.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 55.92. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,672.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 46.93. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹651.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹650.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹544.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹546.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹427.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹427.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, OLECTRA.NS has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while OLECTRA.NS trades at ₹1,024.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas OLECTRA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.14. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLECTRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to OLECTRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check OLECTRA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹619.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹619.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,251.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹9,924.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 186.74. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹9,922.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 186.46. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹423.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹422.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,928.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,929.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,244.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,243.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,847.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,846.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,950.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,959.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹142.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹142.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹953.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹951.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹799.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹796.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,538.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,536.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹136.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹136.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹213.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹213.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹2,003.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,994.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,998.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 68.85. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,999.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 68.85. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹485.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹486.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹518.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹272.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹272.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here

SONACOMS.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONACOMS.NS stands at 337B. In comparison, FMGOETZE.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONACOMS.NS is priced at ₹529.45, while FMGOETZE.BO trades at ₹418.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONACOMS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.03, whereas FMGOETZE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, SONACOMS.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FMGOETZE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONACOMS.NS is more volatile compared to FMGOETZE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONACOMS.NS.Check FMGOETZE.BO's competition here